Back in a bit...

Cars, Bikes, Airplanes, "bicycles" spelled correctly, Tools and Toys.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33642
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Back in a bit...

Post by Gob »

A couple were left "flabbergasted" after a student dumped his car on their drive and went home to China for the summer.

Image

Tom and Julia Ebenezer found the black Citroen and a cactus outside their house in Aberystwyth, Ceredigion.
A note asked them to look after the vehicle and plant, adding "I will bring present from China".
Ms Ebenezer told BBC Radio Wales they could not move the car as he had not left the keys.

She told the Eleri Sion programme the car had been on their drive for three weeks and due to concerns about safety, Dyfed-Powys Police and Ceredigion council had been out.
Other neighbours are now concerned more students could try to park on their drives in order to avoid being fined by parking on roads for weeks on end.
"He's parked over our man hole, which could be quite serious," Ms Ebenezer said.
"The other issue is that if someone did something to the car and it went on fire, the vehicle is on private property and the police cannot do anything about it."

Ms Ebenezer said she was "flabbergasted" when she spotted the car and the cactus as they had only spoken to the student briefly a few times.
"It is quite a nice note, obviously thanking us, and he's going to bring us a present back from China," she said.
"He telephoned yesterday full of apologies, and would I please please accept his apologies, he's heartbroken in China of what he's done.
"Ok he's done wrong, I've accepted his apologies, but the main concern is to get the message out to the community what can happen to them."
I'd have sold it.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by dales »

It's a Citroen, Gob. :lol:

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by Lord Jim »

"The other issue is that if someone did something to the car and it went on fire, the vehicle is on private property and the police cannot do anything about it."
If somebody sets a car on fire on private property in the UK, it's not a police matter :?:
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33642
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by Gob »

I think they may be a little confused there Jim...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

MGMcAnick
Posts: 1345
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: 12 NM from ICT @ 010º

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by MGMcAnick »

Gob wrote:I think they may be a little confused there Jim...
I sure hope so.

I do know, from personal experience, that a car reported on fire is not necessarily considered to be on fire. They may assume that it has a burst radiator hose, and that the smoke is really steam. The time my car caught on fire, the small-town fire chief came out, got in his radio, and told the dispatcher that they'd better roll a truck. "It's really on fire". By the time the truck got there, my 18 month old Chrysler was fully engulfed. The next time I need to report a car on fire, I will remember to say "code three, flames are visible."
A friend of Doc's, one of only two B-29 bombers still flying.

Big RR
Posts: 14092
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by Big RR »

I think they may be a little confused there Jim...
I think so too; if someone set the house on fire, could it not be put out because it was on private property? And could the police not pursue the arsonist?

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 20748
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Back in a bit...

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Lord Jim wrote:
"The other issue is that if someone did something to the car and it went on fire, the vehicle is on private property and the police cannot do anything about it."
If somebody sets a car on fire on private property in the UK, it's not a police matter :?:
An inelegant expression of an English conversational mode. They really mean: the other danger we foresee is that someone may set the car of fire. Because the car is on private property, the police cannot take it away to stop that from happening.

Obviously, the fire brigade would respond to a fire and the police would show up for crowd control. But that was not their point all.

Of course, the police couldn't really respond if someone drilled a hole in one window and filled it with water via a hosepipe, either. Fire risks can be minimized
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply