Page 1 of 1
What science should be about
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 8:53 pm
by Gob
Re: What science should be about
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:25 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
This experiment started well. The characters and background were introduced well but the element of surprise was lacking. The director telegraphed the assassination long beforehand and then dwelt overlong in excruciating slow motion repeats, using only one point of view. The examination of theories involving multiple shot distances failed to convince the viewer of any involvement from the grassy knoll or indeed any other location. I did enjoy the postscript which explained that the ink droplet was not permanently damaged and went on to achieve success in the field of psychology as part of a Rorschach test. Overall: Thumbs down
Re: What science should be about
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:51 pm
by Gob
Thank you Roger Ebert!