Well who'd've thunk it?

There aint half been some clever bastards.
Post science, nature, technology and all geek stuff here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Well who'd've thunk it?

Post by Gob »

People carrying a specific gene may be more at risk of developing mental health problems from smoking cannabis, according to researchers

A study from King’s College London found that cannabis smokers carrying the gene AKT1 had double the chance of developing a psychotic disorder and this increased up to seven-fold if they used the Class B drug daily.

The scientists, led by Dr Marta Di Forti, said their research could be used to advise people who are particularly at risk of the psychological side-effects.

Previous research has shown a link between smoking cannabis and psychosis. There is also emerging data that cannabis exposure during adolescence may increase the risk of developing schizophrenia.

The team studied 489 patients who had had their first episode of psychosis and 278 healthy controls. They looked at the AKT1 gene which is involved in dopamine signaling and known to be abnormal in psychosis.

They performed genetic tests on all volunteers, and assessed their use of cannabis.

Dr Di Forti said: 'We found that cannabis users who carry a particular variant in the AKT1 gene had a two-fold increased probability of a psychotic disorder and this increased up to seven-fold if they used cannabis daily.

'Although using cannabis increases the risk of schizophrenia, most cannabis users come to no harm. It has therefore been suggested that those who develop psychosis may carry some genetic vulnerability.

'Our findings help to explain why one cannabis user develops psychosis while his friends continue smoking without problems. Such findings could also help to design health educational campaigns tailored to reach those young people at particular risk.'


Dr John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry says: 'While the AKT1 genotype does not rise to the level of a clinically useful test of the risk for cannabis psychosis, it does show that this source of psychosis risk has a genetic underpinning.

'This advance also points to cellular signaling mechanisms mediated by Akt1 as being relevant to the biology of cannabis psychosis. This may suggest research directions for novel therapeutics for cannabis psychosis.'

The authors added that further research is needed before the findings can be clinically significant.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Well who'd've thunk it?

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

'Our findings help to explain why one cannabis user develops psychosis while his friends continue smoking without problems.
Wonder if it relates to alcoholism. As one drinker developes into an alcholic while his friends continue to drink without becoming alcholic.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Well who'd've thunk it?

Post by Gob »

Good point mate, I wonder if the gene marker will tell this addiction predisposition.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Well who'd've thunk it?

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Gob wrote:Good point mate, I wonder if the gene marker will tell this addiction predisposition.
When I was in rehab, I went to a very poorly attended "seminar" about the "hereditary" nature of addictions/addicts. Dopamine and some other brain chemical were discussed and how they fluctuate in a normal persons brain and in an addicts brain before, during and after drinking.
Seems us addicts, get a feast and famine effect of these chemicals when we drink then do not drink. Normal people get a slow up tick and down tick during and after drinking. We all return to a somewhat equilibrium, but as soon as the alcoholic drinks again, the spike occurs (just not as high) and the valley does also only lower, so drinking more to get a higher spike (which doesn't come) is our only answer.

Not that any of this helps with not drinking, but it is interesting in understanding the "allergy". (I am reluctant to call it a disease, more of a reaction to some stimulus, aka allergy).

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Well who'd've thunk it?

Post by Gob »

Again, rational and well argued. Nice on O-n-W!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply