pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by rubato »

Whitewater = nothing
Ken Starr = nothing
Monica Lewinski = a private sexual act with a consenting adult.
Bengazhi = nothing
Email = nothing


I think there is a pattern here.


Hysterical investigations of nothing by a party who has no idea of how to govern at all.

I really was hoping to hear about more "McCarthy" hearings from you assholes. Sorry he pussied out and gave in. But it speaks well for his intelligence, not yours.



Meanwhile, Dennis Hastert pleads guilty:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/15/politics/ ... plea-deal/

Tsk tsk tsk. Rather worse than anything Clinton was accused of.


So he was fucking students?




yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Lord Jim »

And all of that (without going into any of the facts involved re White Water, Starr, Lewinsky etc.) would have anything to do with anything we've been discussing....



Because........................?



Would you like to call me "bitch" again? :lol:


Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Lord Jim »

BTW rube, in case you were unclear on this:
Whitewater = nothing
Ken Starr = nothing
Monica Lewinski = a private sexual act with a consenting adult.
Bengazhi = nothing
Email = nothing
An equal sign "=" is not the same thing as providing actual, factual information to support one's argument...

Not even close...

A real scientist would undoubtedly know that, (in fact any reasonably intelligent six year old would probably know that...)

But from many years of reading your posts, I can certainly understand why you wouldn't know that...

So in the interest of being helpful towards the clue-challenged, I thought I'd give you a heads up on that...

Let's review:

An equal sign "=" does NOT "equal" making an effective, fact-based argument...

Now, just repeat that to yourself over and over, (feel free to move your lips...)

until it finally sinks in...

Use as much time as you need...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Lord Jim »

Those lock-step Republican Tea Party types at The New York Times are at it again:
Obama’s Comments About Clinton’s Emails Rankle Some in the F.B.I.

WASHINGTON — Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Mrs. Clinton’s email setup did in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time.

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. But Ron Hosko, a former senior F.B.I. official who retired in 2014 and is now the president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, said it was inappropriate for the president to “suggest what side of the investigation he is on” when the F.B.I. is still investigating.

“Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the F.B.I.’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case,” said Mr. Hosko, who maintains close contact with current agents.

Several current and former law enforcement officials, including those close to the investigation, expressed similar sentiments in separate interviews over several days. Most, however, did so only on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the case.

The White House said Thursday that Mr. Obama had not been commenting on the merits of the investigation, but rather had been explaining why he believes the controversy over Mrs. Clinton’s emails has been overblown. The president, officials said, was merely noting that the emails that have been publicly released so far have not imperiled national security.

“There’s a debate among national security experts, as part of their ongoing, independent review, about how or even whether to classify sections of those emails,” said Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary. “But, as the president said, there is no evidence to indicate that the information in those emails endangered our national security.”

Whether Mr. Obama’s remarks have a lasting effect beyond upsetting some F.B.I. officials depends on the investigation’s outcome.

Since the email inquiry began this past summer, investigators have been scrutinizing everyone who came in contact with Mrs. Clinton’s server and trying to determine whether anyone sent or received classified information, whether that information was compromised and whether any of this amounted to a crime.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/us/po ... quiry.html

So who is it again that's politicizing this investigation?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Guinevere »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... -5-charts/

This new poll is very good news for Hillary Clinton

By Scott Clement October 20 at 3:21 PM
Hillary Clinton has rebounded in the Democratic presidential primary, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released Tuesday. The big takeaway: She has expanded her lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders from 18 points in September to 31 points this month.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

LOL.

Hillary was the most polished person in the debate

she was the best prepared

she had the best lines

she was the most (the only) cut throat person on the stage and she did her job on stage.

with that being said, she was obviously dishonest and pandering in every word she said.

it will not help her....

...glug glug glug.

(insert creepy inappropriate laugh here)

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »


User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Guinevere »

Democrats are solidifying their support for Hillary Clinton as the party’s presidential nominee and show little appetite for Vice President Joe Biden to enter the race, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.

The findings were released just as Mr. Biden, speaking at an event Tuesday, trumpeted his political credentials and took veiled swipes at Mrs. Clinton. But while Biden allies continued to prepare for a White House run, the latest survey found just 30% of those who plan to vote in a Democratic primary said he should seek the nomination—an underwhelming finding for a lifelong public figure who has been agonizing for weeks over a possible White House bid.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-cli ... 1445335201
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Guinevere »

wesw wrote: Hillary was the most polished person in the debate

she was the best prepared

she had the best lines

she was the most (the only) cut throat person on the stage and she did her job on stage.
I.e., the most Presidential.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

all the polls I ve read said that ONLY 47% percent of dems want joe in the race, down from 53%....

...sounds like you are putting lipstick on a pig.

and you left out the obviously dishonest and pandering part.....

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Guinevere »

Learn to read:
the latest survey found just 30% of those who plan to vote in a Democratic primary said he should seek the nomination—an underwhelming finding for a lifelong public figure who has been agonizing for weeks over a possible White House bid.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

uh, you don t think that the wall street journal poll might be different than other polls?

the wall street journal may have slanted their poll to keep joe from entering because Hillary is weaker politically.

anyway you Clinton s are obsessed with polls.

things are looking great for America! bush is in the toilet and Hillary s campaign is going down the drink....

vote Kasich...., or say hello to president trump

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by rubato »

Guinevere wrote:
wesw wrote: Hillary was the most polished person in the debate

she was the best prepared

she had the best lines

she was the most (the only) cut throat person on the stage and she did her job on stage.
I.e., the most Presidential.

She cleans the floor with anyone on the Republiklan side. The GOP should be figuring out that if you rub up against stupid hard enough you will get a lot of it on you. Should be. Be aren't.


yrs,
rubato

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

man. I was all set.

I don t have to watch the kids today. my garden and yard are in proper form.

it was gonna be all Hillary, all day. I was gonna watch the whole she-bang.

gowdy was brief and professional , cummings was full of crap, but they were both brief in their openings..., and then Hillary began her opening. she is still going....

it s beautiful day. I m going out in the yard and finding something to piddle with.

I should have gone fishing....

vote Kasich.

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

whew, she stopped. I m watching again....

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Guinevere »

The committee scheduled 8 hours of testimony. You better take a valium, there is going to be a LOT of well-informed, confident, smart, articulate HRC today. Your head could explode.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

yeah. the problem is that I don t believe a word that she says, no matter how articulately that she says it.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by Lord Jim »

I ain't no fan of Slick Hillie's...

But I'll take her in a heartbeat over a blowhard who believes Vladimir Putin when he says, "we didn't shoot down that plane"....

Of all the ignorant things that Trumpty has said, his braggadocio about how he would "get along" with that KGB thug and murderer Vladimir Putin is the most terrifying...

It would be like having a President who was bragging about his ability to "get along" with Mussolini, or Hitler or Stalin...or Pol Pot....

We don't need a President who can "get along" with murderous thugs; we need a President who will stand up to them...
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

boy. it s now or never time as far as getting trump, isn t it?

the battle is about to be joined in earnest. all hands at battle stations...

I d vote for Bernie before bush.....

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: pool for hillary s withdrawal date....

Post by wesw »

did I miss anything? I opted for yard work.

Post Reply