I'm offended I don't have the right....

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33642
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Gob »

A person's right to be offended does not exist, a senior judge has said, as he hit out at police forces for recording 'hate incidents' despite a lack of evidence.

Mr Justice Julian Knowles claimed officers had become too quick to deem an event as a 'hate incident' even when no crime had been committed.

He made the comment as the College of Policing, which issues guidance to all police forces across the country on how to record 'hate incidents', is facing a High Court challenge over whether the rules are lawful.

The body's Hate Crime Operational Guidance (HCOG), issued in 2014, states a comment reported as hateful by a victim must be recorded, 'irrespective of whether there is any evidence to identify the hate element'.

Mr Justice Knowles told the High Court in London: 'That doesn't make sense to me. How can it be a hate incident if there is no evidence of the hate element?'

'We live in a pluralistic society where none of us have a right to be offended by something that they hear.

'Freedom-of-expression laws are not there to protect statements such as "kittens are cute"; but they are there to protect unpleasant things.

'Its utility lies in exposing people to things that they do not want to hear.'

It comes as former police officer Harry Miller, 53, from Lincoln, launched a case yesterday against the professional body for the police service in England and Wales.

He claims that recording hate incidents against transgender people has 'a real and substantial chilling effect' on freedom of expression.

The landmark case comes after Mr Miller was investigated by Humberside Police earlier this year when a Twitter user complained he shared a 'transphobic limerick'.

Even though no crime was committed, sharing the verse online was recorded as a 'hate incident' under the College of Policing's guidance on hate crime.

The guidance defines a hate incident as 'any non-crime incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender'.

Mr Miller is now taking legal action against the College of Policing and Humberside Police.

His barrister, Ian Wise QC, said his client had used Twitter to 'engage in debate about transgender issues' and argued that Humberside Police had sought to 'dissuade him [Mr Miller] from expressing himself on such issues in the future', which he said was 'contrary to his fundamental right to freedom of expression'.

The High Court heard that Mr Miller had been tweeting about proposed reforms to the Gender Recognition Act for a number of years.

Mr Wise said: 'The claimant has never expressed hatred towards the transgender community, or sought to incite such hatred in others, and has simply questioned (at times provocatively and using humour) the belief that trans women are women and should be treated as such for all purposes.'

He said Mr Miller's views 'form part of a legitimate public debate and cannot sensibly be regarded as hate speech'.

But Jonathan Auburn, for the College of Policing, claimed Mr Miller had 'engaged in regular tweeting relating to transgender people'.

He referred to one tweet in which Mr Miller said: 'I was assigned mammal at birth, but my orientation is fish. Don't mis-species me. F**kers.'

In written submissions, Mr Auburn argued: 'While the claimant now expressly disavows having any personal hostility or prejudice towards transgender people, his social media messages speak for themselves.'

He added that it was 'not beyond reason that a transgender person reading those messages would consider them to be 'motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender'.'

Humberside Police is also fighting the case, arguing that there was no interference with his freedom of expression. The hearing which is expected to last for two days continues.

Yesterday a DBS spokesman told The Daily Telegraph: 'An enhanced DBS check shows spent and unspent convictions, cautions plus any information held by local police that's considered relevant to the role the individual is being considered for.

'In terms of non-crime hate incidents, these may be disclosed on an enhanced check if they are considered by the police to be relevant.'

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 20702
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Oh heavens! Prejudice is illegal? Arrest everyone immediately!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14213
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by rubato »

Your type, anyway.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 13923
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Joe Guy »

Being offended should be illegal.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33642
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Gob »

I'm offended by that idea.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 20702
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

rubato wrote:Your type, anyway.

yrs,
rubato
:lol: Now that's what I call satire!
Image
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6717
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Long Run »

Defending the law against offending, bound to add to a lot of hurt feelings.

Burning Petard
Posts: 4050
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Burning Petard »

To me, this is all the snuffling of a bunch of Water Buffaloes. 'Course I am not a college student in Philadelphia.

snailgate

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16540
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Scooter »

What is the "right to be offended"? Who is seeking the right to have someone offend them? How could such a "right" be enforced, i.e. how could someone be compelled to offend you?
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."

-- Author unknown

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9014
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Scooter wrote:How could such a "right" be enforced, i.e. how could someone be compelled to offend you?
I suppose you could hire people whose sole task was to offend someone.  Where do I sign up?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Big RR
Posts: 14050
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Big RR »

Isn'tthat kind of what the king's fool did, at least according to Shakespeare or in Rigoletto?

Darren
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:57 am

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Darren »

Does anyone believe Blazing Saddles II would get made?
Thank you RBG wherever you are!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 18297
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by BoSoxGal »

Does anyone believe that standards of behavior should remain static over time?


:loon
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 20702
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

What have you mind?

Should not civility toward others be the standard? Is honesty discardable? I would not be in favor of "hurting others for self gratification" becoming a norm.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 13923
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: I'm offended I don't have the right....

Post by Joe Guy »

What kinds of standards of behavior should change with time?

Courtesy?
Respect?

Post Reply