Judges have way too much power

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16813
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Scooter »

Image
DEI: Definitely Earned It
“Because you have to be twice as good to get half as far.”
—The Ancestors

“I'm not courageous, I'm surrounded by cowards”
—Adam Kinzinger

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 18914
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by BoSoxGal »

Scooter wrote:
Wed Nov 17, 2021 11:17 pm
Image
I’m sick with dread every time I open my browser to the news pages, waiting for the verdict from this jury. God help this country in the coming months and years if Rittenhouse walks without any accountability.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Econoline »

Rittenhouse's victims.jpg
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Yes, yes and yes.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16813
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Scooter »

Except I'm not suggesting he broke the law. He acted in legitimate defense of others. Why not make that the narrative?
DEI: Definitely Earned It
“Because you have to be twice as good to get half as far.”
—The Ancestors

“I'm not courageous, I'm surrounded by cowards”
—Adam Kinzinger

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 14422
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Joe Guy »

Scooter wrote:
Thu Nov 18, 2021 2:10 am
Except I'm not suggesting he broke the law. He acted in legitimate defense of others. Why not make that the narrative?
How do you conclude that Rittenhouse was acting in defense of others? I thought he claimed he was there to protect private property.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16813
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Scooter »

I'm talking about the guy who hit Rittenhouse with the skateboard after he shot someone, who attempted (unsuccessfully) to stop him from shooting anyone else.
DEI: Definitely Earned It
“Because you have to be twice as good to get half as far.”
—The Ancestors

“I'm not courageous, I'm surrounded by cowards”
—Adam Kinzinger

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 18914
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by BoSoxGal »

Acquitted across the board.

I hate juries because they are more often than not the embodiment of Yeats’s claim that ‘the best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.’

How long then before things fall apart?
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16813
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Scooter »

Foregone conclusion, even if the "judge" had not been so obviously in the tank for the defense.
DEI: Definitely Earned It
“Because you have to be twice as good to get half as far.”
—The Ancestors

“I'm not courageous, I'm surrounded by cowards”
—Adam Kinzinger

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Normally I hate hearing jurors talking after the fact about their deliberations. I think that should stay in the jury room.

However, I make an exception in this case. I'd like to ask: Mr/Ms Juror, if I walk into your house bearing a big gun which you have just seen me use to kill someone, and you make a not unreasonable attempt to stop me by hitting me with a skate board, am I then entitled to shoot you because I feared for my safety? Yes or no, please.

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

And of course the narrative from the right will now be that Rittenhouse's victims - because whatever that idiot judge said, that's what they are - are rioting assholes who deserved whatever they got from the righteous armed saint. Trump would probably give him a medal of freedom.

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Jarlaxle »

WOOHOO!
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9344
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Hot damn!!   The courts have spoken!!

So, I'm gonna go get me a pistol or two to carry in my handlebar bag, and stop cowering whenever I see one of those coal-rolling, pick'em-up truck driving rednecks — or those Confederate flag-flying, Trump-supporting, white supremacist Klan wanna-bes (and there's still an overly-ample supply of them in my part of 'blue-state Wisconsin') — when I'm out for a bike ride.

Just so long as I make it clear whenever I pull the trigger that I was defending myself because I felt threatened by their behavior and was in fear for my life.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Econoline »

The problem:
Rittenhouse’s self-defense claims boast legal plausibility. But they also illustrate the difficulty of reconciling mass gun ownership and expansive rights to self-defense with the rule of law.

Rittenhouse’s killing of Rosenbaum may have been lawful. But that was scarcely self-evident to the bystanders who heard gunshots and then saw a killer holding an AR-15. The group of protesters who proceeded to chase and attack Rittenhouse could have reasonably believed that killing the armed teenager was necessary to save others from imminent bodily harm. If Rittenhouse had a right to shoot Huber and Grosskreutz in self-defense, the latter had a similarly legitimate basis for shooting Rittenhouse dead.

Put differently: Once Rittenhouse fired his first shots, he and his attackers plausibly entered a context in which neither could be held legally liable for killing the other. Whether one emerged from this confrontation legally innocent or lawfully executed hinged on little more than one’s relative capacity for rapidly deploying lethal violence. Rittenhouse had a more powerful weapon and a quicker trigger finger than Huber or Grosskreutz. Thus, he walks free, in full health, while Huber lies in a grave and Grosskreutz gets by without the bulk of his right bicep.
Read the whole article here:
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Jarlaxle »

Bicycle Bill wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 11:26 pm
Hot damn!!   The courts have spoken!!

So, I'm gonna go get me a pistol or two to carry in my handlebar bag, and stop cowering whenever I see one of those coal-rolling, pick'em-up truck driving rednecks — or those Confederate flag-flying, Trump-supporting, white supremacist Klan wanna-bes (and there's still an overly-ample supply of them in my part of 'blue-state Wisconsin') — when I'm out for a bike ride.

Just so long as I make it clear whenever I pull the trigger that I was defending myself because I felt threatened by their behavior and was in fear for my life.
Image
-"BB"-
Have yourself checked for ergot exposure.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 14422
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Joe Guy »

I’m not surprised at the Rittenhouse verdict because it seemed to me that the judge was on the side of the defense. Regardless of how I feel about the verdict I accept that the jury did their job and saw more evidence than I saw. I just wish that so many people weren’t calling Rittenhouse a hero and saying it’s some kind of victory for the 2nd amendment.

I also wonder how this verdict will affect how civilians are going to react when another out of control protest/riot takes place. Will we now have self-described militias carrying firearms to “help” the police in open-carry states?

Finally, I hope those three people in the Arbery case aren’t acquitted. I'm sure Rittenhouse would feel obliged to go and protect people from burning dislocated dumpsters in Georgia. I'm concerned for his welfare and I hope he wears some body armor this time.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21005
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

ex-khobar Andy wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 10:30 pm
Mr/Ms Juror, if I walk into your house bearing a big gun which you have just seen me use to kill someone, and you make a not unreasonable attempt to stop me by hitting me with a skate board, am I then entitled to shoot you because I feared for my safety? Yes or no, please.
Have you stopped setting up false scenarios? Yes or no, please. He wasn't in anybody's "house"

I would have had a hard time being on this jury. My heart wants to have the little monster jailed forever. My head tells me that the little shit had a legal "right" to walk about on a street openly toting a gun. That he probably was scared once he was by himself and walking away, a shot was fired (not by him) and the reaction was an "attack" against him. He probably did feel he had to defend himself.

He shouldn't have been there dressed to kill. He's what insurers like to call "an attractive nuisance". Like a trampoline or an unfenced pool. But aside from the nastiness of him coming there, having a weapon he shouldn't have had (now apparently not so clear), he didn't break a law up to the time he was attacked. And he was attacked, even granted that one or two of the attackers "thought" they were doing the "right" thing

No one should have the right to hold a firearm with the express intent of shooting anyone who might break a window. But that's not what happened.

The problem is indeed, "the difficulty of reconciling mass gun ownership and expansive rights to self-defense with the rule of law".

All of those militia people carrying weapons should have been disarmed and sent home, maybe to collect their guns later. But that (apparently) would violate their right to strut about with weapons making the implicit promise to defend bricks and mortar with gunfire.

The police however - they should be allowed to shoot a rioter or two after suitable warning. Reading the riot act it used to be called.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Econoline »

As that article I linked to above points out, if Rittenhouse had a right to shoot Huber and Grosskreutz in self-defense because he "feared for his life" then Huber and Grosskreutz certainly would have had the same legitimate reason for shooting Rittenhouse dead. (Their justification might have been even more legitimate. Huber had just seen Rittenhouse shoot a man dead, and Grosskreutz had seen him kill TWO people! They didn't have to guess; they *KNEW* he was a killer.)

Of course the only real difference is...Rittenhouse shot them first. :evil:
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Jarlaxle »

So...did you not actually pay any attention to the trial?
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33642
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Judges have way too much power

Post by Gob »

Later in the day, bystander video captures Mr Rittenhouse being chased into the car park of a used car dealership by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36.

Moments later, unseen on video, Mr Rittenhouse fires four times and kills Rosenbaum.

As he runs down the street away from the scene, Mr Rittenhouse falls and multiple people converge upon him.

Anthony Huber, 26, hits him in the head and neck with a skateboard. Mr Rittenhouse kills him with a bullet to the stomach.

Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, approaches him with a pistol in hand. Mr Rittenhouse wounds him with a shot in the arm.

All three victims were white.
Meh, in a riot, chasing a man armed with a rifle isn't the smartest thing to do. Having seen him shoot a man four times, attacking him armed only with a skateboard, is even less smart. At least the third guy had a gun.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply