LMAO - NSF PETA
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Well it does mean that the guys in the video were bravely defending their home from hordes of rabid squirrels.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Rabies?
In squirrels in the US?
I don't think so. Not to the degree you are trying to make out with. Hordes of rabid squirrels? Nah. No reputable animal disease site agrees with you Lo.
But nothing to reach the heights of rapidity that you are trying to imply with trying to back up why this sick puppy clip is funny.
It isn't funny.
The was no evidence presented that the clip you laughed your big fat arse off watching didnt injure or kill the squirrels. From the way they were projected and the height they reached, I would expect a number of the could easily have broken their backs when thy impacted on the tree.
Face it Lo, deep inside you are just a cruel women. What happened in any of the other clips is not important.
I am sorry I have had to talk to you over this matter.
I much preferred it when you where just rabbiting on to yourself. But like I said, I just can't stand people who promote or defend cruelty.
That's you girl. You are cruel.
Now enlighten that to you Lord God you confused and confuddled person.
In squirrels in the US?
I don't think so. Not to the degree you are trying to make out with. Hordes of rabid squirrels? Nah. No reputable animal disease site agrees with you Lo.
This is not to say that the disease did not jump species lines. The has been one reported case of a rabid squirrel in the last 15 years.How is rabies transmitted?
All species of mammals are susceptible to rabies virus infection, but only a few species are important as reservoirs for the disease. In the United States, distinct strains of rabies virus have been identified in raccoons, skunks, foxes, and coyotes. Several species of insectivorous bats are also reservoirs for strains of the rabies virus.
http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/transmission/index.html
But nothing to reach the heights of rapidity that you are trying to imply with trying to back up why this sick puppy clip is funny.
It isn't funny.
The was no evidence presented that the clip you laughed your big fat arse off watching didnt injure or kill the squirrels. From the way they were projected and the height they reached, I would expect a number of the could easily have broken their backs when thy impacted on the tree.
Face it Lo, deep inside you are just a cruel women. What happened in any of the other clips is not important.
I am sorry I have had to talk to you over this matter.
I much preferred it when you where just rabbiting on to yourself. But like I said, I just can't stand people who promote or defend cruelty.
That's you girl. You are cruel.
Now enlighten that to you Lord God you confused and confuddled person.
Bah!


Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Any one who supports child molestation and animal cruelty just to get attention on a BB has got to be seriously fucked up in the head.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Imagine all you want, I don't look to you for verification at all.
Okay, let's forget the Black Death, the Bubonic Plague; one of the most devastating pandemics in human history, for the sake of this argument: that cute is worth the consequences.
Squirrels are still pests, classified as vermin; for their overcrowding and destruction of property.
Has anyone documented a launching as animal cruelty?
No?
Has the video been taken down?
No?
Is Loca really being ignored?
No?
Is there a point to this Control Freakishness?
NO!
'nUFF Said
I'm cool wit'it.
Okay, let's forget the Black Death, the Bubonic Plague; one of the most devastating pandemics in human history, for the sake of this argument: that cute is worth the consequences.
Squirrels are still pests, classified as vermin; for their overcrowding and destruction of property.
Has anyone documented a launching as animal cruelty?
No?
Has the video been taken down?
No?
Is Loca really being ignored?
No?
Is there a point to this Control Freakishness?
NO!
'nUFF Said
I'm cool wit'it.
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
I am sure what is on the video is not the only examples of projectile squirrel flinging these insensitive arseholes got up to.
What they are doing is 'reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the life of the animal involved.
In none of the shots was there any evidence of a squirrel running off uninjured.
in fact, in no cases can I be certain that the squirrel was NOT injured in some way.
That fact that you are defending your sociopathic behaviour of finding this amusing is not surprising.
Open you eyes Lo.
What they are doing is 'reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the life of the animal involved.
In none of the shots was there any evidence of a squirrel running off uninjured.
in fact, in no cases can I be certain that the squirrel was NOT injured in some way.
That fact that you are defending your sociopathic behaviour of finding this amusing is not surprising.
Open you eyes Lo.
Bah!


Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
What a POS

she has become!!
I'm sorry I opened this sick thread giving the benefit of the doubt.
I hope one of those geekkidz launches one of loCAtroll's bunnies into the fucking freeway. Now THAT would be a laugh!!
Right, loCAtroll?!?
What a POS.

she has become!!
I'm sorry I opened this sick thread giving the benefit of the doubt.
I hope one of those geekkidz launches one of loCAtroll's bunnies into the fucking freeway. Now THAT would be a laugh!!
Right, loCAtroll?!?

What a POS.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Such as Buzzing Roos?The Hen wrote: What they are doing is 'reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the life of the animal involved.
Gob wrote:Here is some video of the multiwiicopter.com SCARAB 12 Tricopter getting up close and personal with some Australian Kangaroos.
Just down the road from us.rubato wrote:Are you stupid?
At 40sec into the video, when the camera first approaches the kangaroos it clearly frightens them into running away. At every point where the flying camera approaches them they act afraid and run away. Causing a wild animal fear and making it expend energy to no purpose is prima facie harmful to them. Most people would call that harassing wildlife.
These are large pest species, to the best of my knowledge, but its the kind of thing people like to outlaw. And really, if you're going to shoot them to make some lovely shoes out of them its not nice to scare them first. Scaring animals is cruel and stupid.
yrs,
rubato
Guess I'm just as sociopathic as the next Taff/Ozzie. LMAO!
Open you[sic] eyes [Hen]

I'll make you a deal; admit that posting a video of the spooking of a mob of roos is 'reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the life of the animal(s) involved; and I'll admit I posted a video of ONE squirrel being put in a possibly similar situation.
...waiting.
...waiting.
...waiting.
<yawn>
Hmmm, I'll have time to holiday shop and hit the post-Christmas sales!
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
First, Hen did not say that posting the video was reckless and dangerous. She said that the actions depicted in the video were reckless and dangerous. She did say that finding the video humorous was the operation of a a diseased mind, and that was echoed by almost all of the posters in the thread. So there is nothing for her to "admit".
Second, the only person in that kangaroo thread who expressed any approval or support of what was done to the kangaroos, was you; you were the one who kept going on and on about how "cool" the operation of this aircraft was, and specifically how "cool" it was to buzz the kangaroos with it. Gob, on the other hand, posted the video without comment of any kind, stating only the fact that it happened near his house. Contrary to the words you attempted to put into his mouth with your cut and paste job, he never once made any attempt to dispute that the kangaroos were in danger or to defend the actions of those who endangered them. Nor did he post the video in Laffs because he thought it was funny. Nor did he trot out a litany of statistics about all of the danger and damage caused by kangaroos, as if that would have been a justification for not treating them humanely.
You chose to rehash the kangaroo thread in an attempt to deflect criticism for your own actions and it has backfired on you, because on every point of comparison, there is a stark contrast between his actions and yours, to the point of being almost polar opposites
Yet one more attempt at misdirection that ends in an epic fail.
Second, the only person in that kangaroo thread who expressed any approval or support of what was done to the kangaroos, was you; you were the one who kept going on and on about how "cool" the operation of this aircraft was, and specifically how "cool" it was to buzz the kangaroos with it. Gob, on the other hand, posted the video without comment of any kind, stating only the fact that it happened near his house. Contrary to the words you attempted to put into his mouth with your cut and paste job, he never once made any attempt to dispute that the kangaroos were in danger or to defend the actions of those who endangered them. Nor did he post the video in Laffs because he thought it was funny. Nor did he trot out a litany of statistics about all of the danger and damage caused by kangaroos, as if that would have been a justification for not treating them humanely.
You chose to rehash the kangaroo thread in an attempt to deflect criticism for your own actions and it has backfired on you, because on every point of comparison, there is a stark contrast between his actions and yours, to the point of being almost polar opposites
Yet one more attempt at misdirection that ends in an epic fail.
Last edited by Scooter on Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
No. That is not a similar comparison at all.loCAtek wrote:Such as Buzzing Roos?The Hen wrote: What they are doing is 'reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the life of the animal involved.
Scooter has covered all points I could possibly want to raise in response to your post Lo.
What a complete load of trolling diversionary shite you came out with.
If Rubato's "harassment" charge went to court it would be just that, an harassment charge.
Depending on the amount of time the remote camera spent flying over the Roos, this matter probably not even progress as there is insufficient evidence from the video. It is doubtful that the "buzzing" would have been going long enough for it to qualify.
However, from the footage you have shown, that was SO AMUSING to you, squirrels were being flung with immense velocity towards a stand of trees. The squirrels were twisting and turning in some case, in others it was a quicker and lower trajectory. There was no footage uploaded showing any squirrel leaving uninjured. It is doubtful that all squirrels that they did this to survived.
It was a VERY cruel act to do to a defenseless animal. (Though I do note that you now realize that you cannot make your spurious claim of no animals being injured in the making of that video.)
As I have stated, what they were doing was reckless, dangerous and put at risk the lives of the animals involved. If this matter went to court the penalties would be far harsher.
YET you find the clip funny AND you are even defending these arseholes and trying to twist the issue to some insignificant clip.
So when did you become such a sociopath, or are you just enjoying being the Board Troll?
Bah!


Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Wot Scooter? I thought the camera was cool. not it's use in the harassment of Roos; get off the pipe why don'cha?. I'm not fooled by yer(or Hen's) misdirection/projection okay?
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Right here:
There are some posters, like you, who constantly misrepresent what other posters say, and of course, when ask to show where it was said, can never do so because, of course, the version they say happened does not exist.
Then there are other posters who, before they will say "Poster A said this...", have already gone to the post in question, read it throughly, and ensured that it was not so ambiguous that it would lend itself to another meaning.
I fall in that second group of posters, as you should well know by now since you have had your ass handed to you time and time again by accusing me of saying something that I have not, or by accusing me of lying when I post a verbatim account of what another poster has said.
And you accusing other posters of misdirection is rich. Thanks for the laugh, you owe me a keyboard.
You obviously haven't learned this lesson yet, so I'm here to educate you.loCAtek wrote:I watched your vid, and thought 'cool' ...I wonder what a SCARAB 12 is? In researching that I find it's an UAV camera; (like a predator drone, which dales posted but you didn't jump his shit; of course I know why not.) ) and that's how it buzzed the roos, Which is also cool.
There are some posters, like you, who constantly misrepresent what other posters say, and of course, when ask to show where it was said, can never do so because, of course, the version they say happened does not exist.
Then there are other posters who, before they will say "Poster A said this...", have already gone to the post in question, read it throughly, and ensured that it was not so ambiguous that it would lend itself to another meaning.
I fall in that second group of posters, as you should well know by now since you have had your ass handed to you time and time again by accusing me of saying something that I have not, or by accusing me of lying when I post a verbatim account of what another poster has said.
And you accusing other posters of misdirection is rich. Thanks for the laugh, you owe me a keyboard.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
No projection from me Lo. I am nowhere near coming close to being identified as a Troll, and I think this thread is evidence of you cowardly nature and sociopathic tendencies.loCAtek wrote:Wot Scooter? I thought the camera was cool. not it's use in the harassment of Roos; get off the pipe why don'cha?. I'm not fooled by yer(or Hen's) misdirection/projection okay?
You've provided that evidence, though it is the only evidence you HAVE provided.
Unless of course we are still waiting for you to come back from your shopping trip and admit that the actions in the clip were reckless, 'dangerous', and it 'puts at risk' the lives of the animals involved.
Waiting ....
Waiting ....
Waiting ....
....
Bah!


Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
She must enjoy getting her face rubbed in her own shit because she manages to pull it off so frequently.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
I've already stated, there are many other videos, I just posted this one because I liked the multiple camera angles.The Hen wrote:There was no footage uploaded showing any squirrel leaving uninjured. It is doubtful that all squirrels that they did this to survived.
You can see, how at the end of the video, YouTube provides embedded links to similar content, if you so desire. I've watch a number of them and as previously stated, they don't show any squirrels being harmed. A few of them, go so far as to show critters landing, and running away uninjured. Please, view them.
Oh wait, now you'll say you don't watch YouTube videos, regardless that you just admitted that you've watched the ones posted by Gob and I, etc.
Very well, as for who watches what- they speak for themselves; I'm sure if it isn't posted in their BBS box of Plan B, then they are the victims of hearsay.
Now, if posting a possible rather than actual scenario, where a creature may be injured, or harmed is sociopathic; then of course posting a video of Roos being panicked fits that criteria. For all we know, off camera, the mob of harassed kangaroos ran into congested traffic and caused massive car pile-ups and significant loss of human and giant marsupial life.
Ya wanna say, what's bad off screen? Why stop there?
Why not say the disease ridden carcasses of kangaroos spread a miasma of decay that caused recently deceased corpses to rise from the grave and shamble through the urban city streets in an unending quest for braiiiiiiins, braiiiiiiiiiiiiiins!
I say you're sick, sick I tell ya, for promoting such cataclysmic doom on humanity, in such an undead fashion.

How dare you! Shame! A pox on your house, and your livestock! May Oz be the first to fall to the zombie horde!
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
No one said that posting it made you sociopathic. Finding it funny to watch animals being tortured is what makes you sociopathic.
Anyone else except you express any delight at watching animals being tortured, as you did?
Didn't think so.
Anyone else except you express any delight at watching animals being tortured, as you did?
Didn't think so.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Again, you speaking for anyone else is hearsay.
When/where an animal being tortured is your delusion ...only.
Where's the committee on squirrel flinging abuse ...girlfriend?
When/where an animal being tortured is your delusion ...only.
Where's the committee on squirrel flinging abuse ...girlfriend?
Last edited by loCAtek on Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
I am speaking based on what has been posted for everyone to see.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
I see only you and the Ozzie wench posting; you got better?
BTW you been sleepin'?
BTW you been sleepin'?
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
Perhaps you need glasses if you see only two people who have posted in this entire thread.
Or if you imagine that anyone but you has expressed delight at seeing animals tortured and terrorized.
Or if you imagine that anyone but you has expressed delight at seeing animals tortured and terrorized.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: LMAO - NSF PETA
I've been sleeping fine. I don't have enjoying watching animals being tortured on my conscience, like you would if you had a conscience.loCAtek wrote:BTW you been sleepin'?
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose