History not Nike's strong point.

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11649
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Crackpot »

You don't know your beers then jim
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Lord Jim »

I know what I like.

I'm not going to take seriously being told that I somehow can't really be enjoying a beer at the temperature I enjoy it at by some suds snob who's insisting the only proper temperature to drink it at is the one they like it at...

(This is a sore point with me because I happen to know a couple of hardcore beeries who are fanatics about this...)

It wasn't bad enough that for decades we've had a bunch of wine control freak know-it-alls whining about the only proper ways one should enjoy various wines...

Now, we've got legions of beer busy bodies too....

What next?

Are some snooty apple aficionados going to come along to tell us the only "proper" way we are permitted to enjoy cider?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Sean »

Well I can't comment on your American 'beer' Jim but over-chilling proper ale absolutely destroys the flavour. It is a common misconception that English beer is warm.

Think of over-chilling real ale to be akin to overcooking steak. ;)
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Lord Jim »

absolutely destroys the flavour
Well, what you call "destroying the flavour"....

I would call "making palatable"... :P

Come to think of it, there are very few beverages I enjoy drinking at room temperature....

Scotch, cognac, brandy....

That's about it...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Gob »

Lord Jim wrote: Are some snooty apple aficionados going to come along to tell us the only "proper" way we are permitted to enjoy cider?
Jim, the ONLY way to enjoy cider is sat in a deck chair, in the shade of an old oak, watching the village cricket team.

Image
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by The Hen »

I agree with Sean 100%.

I don't like beer but for taste you HAVE to have an English ale at English room temperature. It is soooooo good you wouldn't believe.
Bah!

Image

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Sean »

But it's not served at room temperature!

That is the myth.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by The Hen »

Fair doos. But Chuckles keeps his in his cupboard in the kitchen in Exeter and it was the tastiest I had tried.
Bah!

Image

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by rubato »

The only reason to drink beer cold is if it tastes nasty and you want to deaden your taste buds or if you're in a hot climate and you want to cool off. Good beer is much better at cellar temp. than refrigerated.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11649
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Crackpot »

another common misconception. Different beers taste differently at different temperatures Some taste better colder some taste better warmer. Only a moron would claim there is only one temperature to properly drink beer.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20012
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by BoSoxGal »

The flavors available in a cool room temp Guinness far surpass drinking it cold.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6722
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Long Run »

Re the point of the original post, to the vast majority of the NIKE wearing world, black and tan at St. Patrick's Day has only the meaning that NIKE meant. It was a faux pas with respect to 1% of their customer universe. Indeed, the vast majority of people in this country who celebrate St. Patrick's Day have no better than a vague idea of what the point of the celebration is -- they just know it has Irish origins and it is a good time to party and have a Guinness, or maybe even a black and tan.

All in all, it is a pretty understandable mistake for even a large company to make because it is not like calling it the Pol Pot or Hitler shoe. It is closer to the "cougar" mascot issue, where a term has a benign understanding for most people, but a negative understanding for a minority. I do think you try to avoid upsetting people, but this one is pretty far down the list of marketing miscues.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17253
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Scooter »

They said they called them Black and Tans specifically because that was reminscent of something Irish. That makes it a completely unforgivable blunder, because the strongest Irish assocication with that name is, in fact, the constabulary, and not any kind of beer. And yes, it would be just as bad to be marketing a product to 40-ish women and using cougar imagery of any kind.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by loCAtek »

Since when was 'cougar' derogatory?

Urban dictionary begs to differ;


An attractive woman in her 30's or 40's who is on the hunt once again. She may be found in the usual hunting grounds: nightclubs, bars, beaches, etc. She will not play the usual B.S. games that women in their early twenties participate in. End state, she will be going for the kill, just like you. Associated with milfs
cougar

1349 up, 1224 down





Hot and sexy older woman, usually in her 40s or 50s, single or married, who is sick of her same-age counterparts which are usually hairless, have big guts, who only talk about their insurance premiums and have the TV remote control attached to their hands. Cougars are attractive, in their sexual prime, who know what they want and aren't afraid to go after it. BIG misconception is that they dress cheap, wear hot pink nail polish, animal skin prints and are not-so-attractive old-looking hags with bleached hair (Yeah those women exist, but they are NOT cougars). True cougars are classy, beautiful creatures who have made their successes on their own, have real brains, usually with expensive cars/homes, and are real head turners. Cougars seek younger men, and don't have to sneak up and attack...they know their younger mates are eager to get an experienced woman who won't ask if they'll call them the next day. Being a cougar is a positive thing.

as do I, I never minded it. ;)

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17253
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Scooter »

Apparently a slim majority of people are turned on by the image of woman as sexual predator. Whatever floats your boat, I guess.

Regardless of the hijack, the failure to grasp the visceral reaction that would be evoked by using Black and Tans as a brand name was just plain stupid.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21436
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

It was not a good name-choice. But was anyone actually Irish actually upset?
Irish Americans protested
These are the people who like to march in St Patrick's day parades on the grounds that they once had a great great grandparent who left Ireland at the age of zygote and was born on a boat but not the Titanic. This makes them "Irish" Americans and experts on all things Emerald.

Of course, sales in Ireland don't matter a durn to Nike. There they'll probably just try to eat them (or drink them) and besides the majority population is now Polish anyway. :nana

Meade

(Traditional)
It was down in the town of old Bantry
When most of the fighting was through,
It was there that a young Irish soldier
Said "They've buggered me Black and Tan shoes".

"Won't you bury them out on the mountain,
to mark where the fighting was done.
Won't you bury them out on the mountain
with the laces all torn and undone."

And now that we're back in old Dublin
With Guiness and ale in our hands,
Won't you think of the young Irish soldier
Who grieves for his lost Black and Tans
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Gob »

Inviting followers on Twitter to "show us what makes you proud to be British" as part of a diamond jubilee promotion must have seemed like a good idea at the time at Starbucks.

But after tweeting the invitation to nearly 2,000 Irish followers of its Twitter account on Tuesday, the coffee giant has been on the receiving end of a backlash over its seemingly shaky grasp of political geography.

"Right now someone in Starbucks Ireland is wishing there was a Twitter version of the memory wipe thing from Men In Black," was just one of the responses tweeted soon after.

One follower of the Starbucks Ireland account (@Starbucks.IE), Fergus McNally, commented: "the ie stands for Ireland, awaiting the apology before I visit your stores again!!"

An apology did come, hours after the gaffe, with the Starbucks Ireland account telling followers: "We erroneously posted to our Irish Twitter page meaning to post to the UK only. Customers in Ireland: We're sorry."

The company later followed up by issuing a statement saying: "First and foremost we apologise to our Irish customers for the mistake made on Twitter this afternoon.

"The tweet, which was only meant to be sent to our British Twitter followers as part of the diamond jubilee celebrations, was erroneously posted to our Irish Twitter page.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Gob »

Adidas has sparked outrage and been accused of 'promoting slavery' by creating a new pair of trainers which have bright orange 'shackles' that fit around the wearer's ankles.

The clothing giant is under fire for its August scheduled release of the JS Roundhouse Mids, which many have compared to the devices worn by black slaves in 19th Century America.

The seemingly innocent promotional material, uploaded to Facebook earlier this month, asks: 'Got a sneaker game so hot you lock your kicks to your ankles?'

Image

But the shoes have sparked angry debate online, with many saying there is a more cynical tone to the advertisement.

More than 2,000 people have labelled the design 'offensive' and 'ignorant' and say the firm has 'sunk to new lows' in its 'slavewear' product.

Dr Boyce Watkins, writing for Your Black World, said: 'Shackles. The stuff that our ancestors wore for 400 years while experiencing the most horrific atrocities imaginable.

'Most of which were never documented in the history books and kept away from you in the educational system, all so you'd be willing to put shackles on your ankles today and not be so sensitive about it.'

The Professor at Syracuse University said he accepted some people would accuse him of overreacting.

But he added: 'There is always a group of negroes who are more than happy to resubmit themselves to slavery.

'I'm offended by these shoes as there is nothing funny about the prison industrial complex, which is the most genocidal thing to happen to the black family since slavery itself.'

Others have likened the shoes' orange 'bracelets' to the shackles worn by prisoners across the America, or said the firm is 'promoting slavery'.

Facebook user Kay Tee agreed, and said: 'It's offensive and inappropriate in many ways. Not to mention ugly.

'Regardless if the company was saying the shoes are so hot you have to chain them to you, or they were capitalising on the whole prison style popularity.

'But corporate business has a social responsibility above all to consider these perceptions before releasing a product like this.

'How would a Jewish person feel if they decided to have a shoe with a swastika on it and tried to claim it was OK in the name of fashion?'

Image

Adidas has been contacted by Mail Online, but has so far not commented on the claims.

It seems Adidas did not want to be outdone by fierce competitor Nike in the controversial shoe design stakes.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by dales »

'I'm offended by these shoes as there is nothing funny about the prison industrial complex, which is the most genocidal thing to happen to the black family since slavery itself.'
What a load of unmitagated feces. :lol:

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: History not Nike's strong point.

Post by Sean »

They could always market them in Oz...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

Post Reply