Enough is enough, should loCAtek be banned permanently?

[Scooter]

She clearly came back with absolutely no intention of modifying her behaviour. She is clearly attempting to cause trouble and continues to cast unfounded aspersions against the admins. I am not prepared to put up with another year of her antics until it once again takes over most of the board.

[loCAtek]

The board rules consisting of? ...

[The Hen]

You have been told. It is not the role of Plan B to feed it to you in Lo-speak. Which rule do you have an issue with?

[Scooter]

Please do not allow this thread to become cluttered with her attempts to disrupt the board. I'm sure the members will want to weigh in and do not need to be bothered with her continued attention seeking behaviour.

[Gob]

There are no hard and fast board rules. Any issues of contention, (like the suspending of members who become board destructive,) will be put to the membership for consideration, debate, and probably a poll.

[loCAtek]

You have been told. It is not the role of Plan B to feed it to you in Lo-speak. Which rule do you have an issue with?

All of them, pls post them in plain English.

[Sean]

Sadly, I voted yes. I might have abstained if not for today's bullshit attempts at causing more grief here.

[loCAtek]

No rules? Well, that's what I said, ThX

[Sean]

And now she's posting the same shit in multiple threads. I was all ready to wipe the slate clean and give her a fresh start but it's now patently obvious that she doesn't want that. She just wants to continue as before.

[Scooter]

Can the creator of a thread edit the topic title? I would like to clarify what this thread is about to keep the process completely transparent.

If it requires an admin's hand, could one of them append "should loCAtek be banned permanently?" to the existing title. Thanks.

[Sean]

You should be able to Scoot...

[Scooter]

Got it, thanks Sean.

[Scooter]

And now in this thread, she claims not to know where and how it was decided that she would be suspended. Seriously? What more evidence is necessary to demonstrate that she is posting with the express intent of causing trouble?

[MajGenl.Meade]

I've voted against this on grounds of principle, although I find Loca tedious most of the time now

I've tried different ways to say this and nothing will satisfy those who think themselves righteous. For every one of her stupid "I can't edit" or "what are the rules?" posts, there are multiple abusive and sometimes foul-mouthed responses. Who exactly is the problem here? I suggest that we all are and I do not exclude myself.

In her own Falcon thread, she made a stupid edit remark. It has provoked a stream of attacks and she's now blamed for responding to those attacks and its her thread dammit! Hen has started a thread designed for Loca with an invitation to beat her head against a wall - she is - and she's attacked now for contributing her silly arguments and statements there!

Loca is out of line; I agree. The continued "What are the rules?" question is absolutely designed just to annoy. But it does not deserve a total ban - almost nothing should.

I will try politeness. Loca, please stop posting comments about "editing" and about "rules". Thank you.

Meade

[Gob]

I agree to a large extent Meade. BUT, having seen the CSB fall apart in no small measure due to the actions of a few, then to have Lo come here and to try to destroy this place in the same way out of sheer spite, makes my ability to respond to her with politeness and measured tones diminished almost totally.

[Sean]

The following is also worth noting:

Since her return, lo has posted 102 times. Of these posts, 48 have been regular posts (I'm being generous and giving her the benefit of the doubt on a few), 51 have been outright shit-stirring and 3 were purely personal attacks against Gob and Daisy.

The first attack (against Daisy of all people) occurred less than 20 posts in and was completely unprovoked.

These are not the actions of somebody who has got any intention of being a regular forum member.

[MajGenl.Meade]

I agree to a large extent Meade. BUT, having seen the CSB fall apart in no small measure due to the actions of a few, then to have Lo come here and to try to destroy this place in the same way out of sheer spite, makes my ability to respond to her with politeness and measured tones diminished almost totally.

Understood and thank you. But does Loca have that power? Who ceded it to her? I left CSB because 2/3/4 I don't recall how many people turned every thread into an abusive, name-calling slag-fest. But it wasn't one person - it took at least two to holler abuse at each other. And then two more to holler abuse about the abuse and so on. It was simply boring to have to wade through all the playground posturing. Granted, some of youse is much more into this as being some kind of reality than I am

Sean makes good points - with measurements - channeling rubato? (but Sean, do you count her participation an on-going "yes you did no I didn't" as ordinary posts or in the 51 negative ones?). What you call 'attacks' I call farts in a thunderstorm. Perhaps thinly veiled insults; I did call her on one or two of those. As always, consider the source.

Meade

[BoSoxGal]

As always, consider the source.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Edit: busted image (it was ok on preview as is this one)

[Sean]

As I said Gen'l, I gave her the benefit of the doubt on quite a few posts where there was a tit for tat thing happening. I considered the attack (yes, attack ) on Daisy to be the most distasteful as it was a personal slur against an admin who had done nothing but try to help lo up to that point.

And if I were channeling Rubato I would've shown it all in graph form!