A gay man's wet dream

Movies, books, music, and all the arts go here.
Give us your recommendations and reviews.
Big RR
Posts: 14744
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Big RR »

Did you watch it Scooter (or anyone else)? I saw part 1 and give it about a C-C+; it wa entertaining at times, but I never bought Sarandon or Lange as Davis and Crawford, and honestly wonder what future episodes will deal with--or will we just see evidence they don't like each other again and again? I'll give the second episode a watch, but I don't know if I'll go any further. It looks like the idea is miles ahead of the execution.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17122
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Scooter »

I haven't seen it yet; I recorded it last night (along with my regular Sunday night fare) and haven't got through it yet.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Lord Jim »

I watched it, and I'm close to Big RR about it...C+...

It had its moments, but it didn't knock my socks off...

I enjoyed learning some of the back history that I wasn't aware of... (for example I didn't know that Crawford was the one who found the story and pushed the production)

So far I think Sarandon's performance is better than Lange's...

There's something about Lange's performance that seems forced and unnatural...She doesn't seem to be bringing any emotional depth or intensity to the role...

But I think it was good enough to watch it for more than just one more episode...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19699
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by BoSoxGal »

I haven't watched yet, waiting to binge. If you guys report back that it sucks, I might just skip it altogether.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6721
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Long Run »

FX has had a string of very good mini-series, so if this one doesn't measure up that will be doubling disappointing.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Lord Jim »

I'm ticked off at FX...

We watched the second episode, which I thought was an improvement over the first, (especially Lange's performance) but ever since then, the only versions FX has been sending through to Comcast On Demand are the HD versions...

I am not a fan of HD (neither is Kelly) so we haven't "upgraded" any of our fleet of televisions to it..

This has happened from time to time before with other programs, (it's also been a a problem recently with the latest season of Ripper Street) but normally the station fixes the problem after a few days, and sends through the Standard Definition version...(BBC America has been doing that with Ripper Street...)

But we're now past episodes 3 and 4 with episode 5 coming today, and FX hasn't done jack about it...

I hope I'm not going to have the same problem with the new Fargo....
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17122
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Scooter »

Perhaps you should wait until it comes out on VHS. :nana
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6721
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Long Run »

Yes, first world problem and all. 8-)

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19699
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by BoSoxGal »

Why are you not fans of HD? Just curious . . .
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

A wet man's gay dream

Post by RayThom »

BoSoxGal wrote:Why are you not fans of HD? Just curious...
I've avoided an upgrade to HD because Xfinity wants an extra $10 a month from me. They're already charging me too much for basic service and that creeps higher every year.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19699
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by BoSoxGal »

Cable television is a huge ripoff, IMHO. Several years ago I had a bronze package on Dish and it seemed a fair deal, but I suppose it depends a lot on what channels and how many you need. I'll admit I do watch my TV several hours each week for MSNBC politics coverage, but otherwise I do all my watching via streaming services - Amazon, Hulu, Netflix and the PBS webplayer/app. With all those I have WAY too much to choose from, and total cost is $37.50/mo. - it's a good investment considering that and my library card constitutes my entire entertainment in life - and it's plenty, I'm happy.

I wouldn't mind if my housemates cancelled the cable, and I think they are considering it. I share all my streaming services with them and we have the 4 screens package because sometimes everyone is watching something different. Modern life . . .
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

LJ doesn't have HDTV??? :o well now I have heard everything. Even I (and in my man cave no less) have HDTV. Of course it is hardly ever used and even less so now that DD has finished it's run.

Now I have to travel to east-bumF#@k Pa to see god-fearing rednecks blow stuff up. :mrgreen:
But it is live rather than memorex recorded.

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

A wet man's gay dream

Post by RayThom »

oldr_n_wsr wrote:... Now I have to travel to east-bumF#@k Pa to see god-fearing rednecks blow stuff up. ... But it is live rather than memorex recorded.
That sounds like a Tannerite party. May God have mercy on your soul.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

May God have mercy on your soul.
That's still up in the air.
;)

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Lord Jim »

BoSoxGal wrote:Why are you not fans of HD? Just curious . . .
I think it tends to make shows and movies look kind of cheap and harshly lit...(sort of like the quality you see in a daytime soap opera)
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17122
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Scooter »

I felt that way at first too, I think it's a function of a couple of things: (1) the higher resolution means you are seeing a lot more detail, a standard resolution picture will naturally look "softer" (2) this means that it is more important that your picture settings are properly adjusted to match the ambient lighting. After a while, a standard definition picture will look almost grainy and blurry by comparison.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: A wet man's gay dream

Post by Lord Jim »

RayThom wrote:
BoSoxGal wrote:Why are you not fans of HD? Just curious...
I've avoided an upgrade to HD because Xfinity wants an extra $10 a month from me. They're already charging me too much for basic service and that creeps higher every year.
Ray, when Xfinity dings you with their annual price increase, have you called them about it?

Six years ago when I dropped AT&T and switched to a package deal (phone, internet and cable) with Comcast, I got a great deal...

But every year when they've hit me with their charge increase, I've called them and said "This was a really good deal when I signed up, but with that increase I think I'm going to have to look at going with another service"...

Every time they rolled back the fee...( a couple of times when I was a month or two late in calling them on this, they've made the lower rate retroactive and credited me back for the months I paid the higher fee...the last time I even wound up with a cheaper rate for the same service, and locked it in for two years)

I'm now paying less for our bundled service, (which includes the Comcast Gold Package on multiple TVs) then I was six years ago...

If I hadn't squawked, by now I'd probably being paying twice as much...

It's worth picking up the phone...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6721
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Long Run »

Scooter wrote:I felt that way at first too, I think it's a function of a couple of things: (1) the higher resolution means you are seeing a lot more detail, a standard resolution picture will naturally look "softer" (2) this means that it is more important that your picture settings are properly adjusted to match the ambient lighting. After a while, a standard definition picture will look almost grainy and blurry by comparison.
I'm with you. HD is so much sharper. Plus, if you watch sports, it's no contest!

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

A Wet Man's Gay Dream

Post by RayThom »

Lord Jim wrote:... If I hadn't squawked, by now I'd probably being paying twice as much...
It's worth picking up the phone...
Thank you for the advice. I'll see how far my feigned righteous indignation gets me upon their next price hike.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: A gay man's wet dream

Post by Crackpot »

I had that sort of deal going until I moved out of my apartment where they screwed me royally. ( I paid installation fees in order to keep my current charges and they reneged on the deal).
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply