And sometimes one needent answer.The Hen wrote:Sometimes the obvious is the correct answer.
Deleted a "user" who had made a post
-
oldr_n_wsr
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Deleted a "user" who had made a post
Re: Deleted a "user" who had made a post
I'm guessing the same set of regs that are reeferred to here...loCAtek wrote:Well, it had to be done and it's been done on CSB too, since that's a violation of regs. That's when and why the *whack*s began.Gob wrote:
If anyone has any thoughts or complaints about my actions, please air them here.
Cheers
Taff
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is
Re: Deleted a "user" who had made a post
And there is a classic example. There was never any explicit "rule" established against spamming, but everyone, including the Queen Bitch, understood that it wasn't allowed and supported admin's actions to exterminate spammers from the board. Funny how what she fully supported then is suddenly giving her indigestion now.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
Re: Deleted a "user" who had made a post
Actually, the explicit "rule" was written at CSB, which I referenced. Nearly 100% of posters on Plan B came from CSB, and could spot/understand the reference.
We're the 99%.
We're the 99%.
Re: Deleted a "user" who had made a post
Still do and by implication, per yer post, it was carried over.loCAtek wrote:Actually, the explicit "rule" was written at CSB, which I referenced. Nearly 100% of posters on Plan B came from CSB, and could spot/understand the reference.
We're the 99%.
No argument when you posted it first no argument now.
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is