Joe Guy wrote: Why would anyone want to be president?
Is it for the retirement benefits?
Nope, it's for the life-time Secret Service protection, and the lavish funeral.

Joe Guy wrote: Why would anyone want to be president?
Is it for the retirement benefits?
Isn't that part of the retirement benefit?loCAtek wrote:Joe Guy wrote: Why would anyone want to be president?
Is it for the retirement benefits?
Nope, it's for the life-time Secret Service protection, and the lavish funeral.
If Obama is reelected he will continue to do what he is doing now which is basically nothing. How much of the one trillion dollar stimulus made it to shovel ready projects? I suspect that the majority if it was skimmed off and used for political purpose because I see no effect on the economy.Mr. Duality wrote:I fail to understand how an intelligent person could even consider Newt for President. He has an amazing amount of baggage, especially the fact that of him having been the only Speaker of the house ever to have been disciplined for ethics violations.
Huntsman is the only one of them I might vote for but he apparently has no hope of getting the nomination. It's a sad situation.
What do you base that on Dale? I don't see that at all...Huntsman was filtered out by the GOP hierarchy.
I wish they were more concerned about economic salvation. I know you all don’t see our situation as seriously as I do; our present situation has the potential to make the great depression look like the good old days. During World war II, Winton Churchill once said to save my country I would deal with the devil. I know how he felt.Lord Jim wrote:What do you base that on Dale? I don't see that at all...Huntsman was filtered out by the GOP hierarchy.
BTW, the research I've done on Huntsman indicates to me that he is far more Conservative on a wide range of issues than many of his Liberal cheerleaders in the media must think he is.
The main thing those folks want is a winner; .
You really don't read much. His OWN PARTY voted against him overwhelmingly in approving the fine. Newt was dirty.dgs49 wrote:On Newt's "baggage," I think the ethics situation is miniscule compared to how people will react when his history of serial adultery comes to light. The ethics charges were political bullshit - he was accused to doing the kinds of things that most influential congressmen do. He taught a college course on Government and paid the expenses with charitable contributions. He accepted an unprecedented fine ($300,000), resigned, and never had a problem with the IRS. Who cares?
... "