Please ignore the spammers.

[Sue U]

According to its profile, "gosoraxils" is a 42-year-old in Belize who is interested in dining out. I have a suggestion for what s/he could eat.

[Daisy]

Eat my spam whacker ....

[The Hen]

Is there someway of causing them immense pain as well?

I want them to hurt.

[Crackpot]

We could create a special forum that is comprised of only Quaddriver and dgs posts.

[@meric@nwom@n]

We could create a special forum that is comprised of only Quaddriver and dgs posts.

Or all Loca all the time. Particularly cruel.

[oldr_n_wsr]

We have a lady in our group therapy who never shuts up. She has to yap after (and during) anyone else talks and when her turn comes it goes on and on and on. I brought up the subject of "group dynamics" during the "free talk" hour one time and went over how a couple of people were monopolizing the time and how others suffer when one or two people take over the group. Of course she did not see herself in my commentary and got offended the other day when I came right out and told her about what she was doing.

[loCAtek]

No, cruel is repeatedly stabbing a good General in the heart, because he tried to be a peace-keeper. What's most sad is the obvious and advertized enjoyment of being so cruel.

[The Hen]

What? Seriously, what?

[loCAtek]

Ask yourself where's the General after what she said to him?

[The Hen]

Oh, is that what you are on about.

Silly me. I thought this was a Spammer's thread, not a trouble-making thread. Have you thought that he might have a bit on at the moment Lo? People aren't obliged to post here every day.

In any case ... as you were.

[loCAtek]

A shame you find his treatment silly; but since you asked, I didn't bring up cruelty, just pointed it out to those who claim to know it and enjoy using it.

[The Hen]

I said I was silly Lo. See? Just up there. I said "Silly me."

You see I thought this was a thread about Spammers and not trouble-makers.

Oh? It is a thread about Spammers? Then perhaps you should start your own thread if you want to start trouble about how people have treated other posters who are not spammers. I would prefer this one to be kept for Spamming issues.

Many thanks for your compliance with this polite request.

: )

[loCAtek]

I did not start the hijack, and the trouble started with the treatment, not I. I'm merely correcting the accusations of the one who did; in the thread the accusations were raised. You may wish to remind that poster of etiquette as well?

[Lord Jim]

Gee, this has taken an unexpected turn....

For what it's worth, I am quite certain that Meade is not so delicate that he has been driven off because of a few harsh words....

For example, there's a brain dead moron on this site, who has for years called Meade a "racist"....

Meade, a man who left his children and grand children and a comfortable retirement in the Mid-west to spend his golden years helping impoverished black kids in Africa. (At some risk to his own life; The Republic of South Africa, is not exactly the safest and securest of countries)

If this disgusting, ongoing idiotic smear from this know-nothing dough-ass (who would never in a million years have the strength of character to make any sort of similar altruisitic sacrifice himself; despite all his empty bleating about his "social conscience") has left the Gen'l unfazed, he isn't likely to fold because of a one off insult.

As Hen pointed out, Meade doesn't post here every day. I'm sure we'll see him again.

[Timster]

Indeed. And - Agreed Jim. Wait What? No Really? WTF?! Grrrr. This 'wolf's fur is being rubbed the wrong way. However, I will reserve judgment:?

Without a full explanation and I know that none is required; (the individual would do well to describe WTF be the haps here? Que pasa? Chingo ESE? Ora-ales pews!

I thought that WE had collectively put the shit behind US. . . . Evidently not.?

Seriously. WTF?

[Daisy]

We have a lady in our group therapy who never shuts up. She has to yap after (and during) anyone else talks and when her turn comes it goes on and on and on. I brought up the subject of "group dynamics" during the "free talk" hour one time and went over how a couple of people were monopolizing the time and how others suffer when one or two people take over the group. Of course she did not see herself in my commentary and got offended the other day when I came right out and told her about what she was doing.

Aaaaaand

No, cruel is repeatedly stabbing a good General in the heart, because he tried to be a peace-keeper. What's most sad is the obvious and advertized enjoyment of being so cruel.

Still not getting it?

loCA, I've stayed out of all this for a long time in the hope that this would have ended after the last spat. You're painting yourself as a peacemaker but all you appear to be doing is stirring up trouble.

@w's side swipe at you may be construed as being a little mean, however YOU and only YOU are responsible for the caricature YOU have made of YOURSELF in recent months, if you have become a target then YOU need to take the bullseye off your back. Please cut with all the passive/aggressive and get back to the good hearted, good humoured poster we all know you can be.

[loCAtek]

Now, Meade has been said how he feels about those kind of remarks regarding his dog. Then he re-posted his sentiments here thinking he was among friends. He has said what guin has said; what Kiko has said; which was what Gar had said, then he was back stabbed for it

That has been direct, not P/A- yet when I see the spite done to good people for no reason other than gleeful malice, no I do not feel good hearted about that, I feel angry.

Those kind of actions are deliberately cruelty, not jokes.

Remember when CSB, was bout making each laff? That has always the appeal to me; but watching the entertainment turn to 'laff at other's pain'. This is not a caricature but a response to my environment. I laff at what's funny, not deliberately hurtful.

[Lord Jim]

Tim, I just sent you a PM.

(Also, if there's anyone else who doesn't know who the poster is who has repeatedly leveled this vile and preposterous charge at Meade who would like to know, please PM me and I'll be happy to tell you. I would prefer not to further contribute to derailing a thread that's supposed to be about spam reports. I only mentioned it to provide an illustration of Meade's resilience to attacks. )

[quaddriver]

I said I was silly Lo. See? Just up there. I said "Silly me."

You see I thought this was a thread about Spammers and not trouble-makers.

Oh? It is a thread about Spammers? Then perhaps you should start your own thread if you want to start trouble about how people have treated other posters who are not spammers. I would prefer this one to be kept for Spamming issues.

Many thanks for your compliance with this polite request.

: )

I didnt see the post where you directed those words at crackpot and @w as well. oversight? selective ethics?

[Scooter]

There are those who are here to cause trouble because their favoured playground is circling the drain. Seeing this place thrive is getting under their skin, and as I predicted when this place started (because, as already demonstrated, I am psychic where they are concerned) they are doing their level best (flaccid as the effort is) to cause trouble. Don't give them the satisfaction.