Guinevere wrote:So, to be clear (as mud) you ball a ball six times in a bowl? Or an over.
Lets try this again, a bowler balls a ball six times in a over?
Why doesn't a bowler bowl a ball?
Ah so! Yes indeed the bowler bowls the ball. But in the sentence "That's the kind of pitch cricket fans are used to...", it's not OK to replace 'pitch' with 'bowl'.
"That's the kind of
bowl cricket fans are used to...." is non-U.
The commentator, in an approving voice, might say "That's the kind of ball cricket fans are used to...." if indicating that the result of the bowler's action was a good "ball", no longer referring to the red spherical thing itself but to its path, speed, placement and trajectory... and direction... and speed (did I say 'speed'?). The commentator might also say "That's the kind of bowling cricket fans are used to....", indicating general approval of the performance of the bowler(s).
So you see a pitcher may be pitching a pitch (owing to US-Americans lack of sophisticated language skills and maps)
But a bowler is never bowling a bowl
LJ - you explain it
Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
