Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Food, recipes, fashion, sport, education, exercise, sexuality, travel.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by Gob »

The first same sex weddings on Australian soil have taken place, with Canberra men Joel Player and Alan Wright saying ‘I do’ minutes after midnight in an emotional ceremony at the National Carillon.

Image

In front of 20 guests on the nearby footbridge, the pair promised to be each other's "lawfully wedded husband" and at 12.12am on December 7, 2013, shared their first kiss as a married couple to a chorus of cheers.

Mr Player, 30, and Mr Wright, 34, shared the first marriage honour with at least one other pair, as West Australian state politician Stephen Dawson and Dennis Liddelow were married outside Parliament House at 12.01am.

Mr Player told his partner of seven years that he loved him with all his heart, and could not live without him.

Mr Wright responded by expressing through choked tears his joy at being able to formally call his soulmate, best friend and lover, his husband.

"”Whenever it feels though the world is against me, you are there with a shoulder to cry upon and a smile to make it all not so bad," he said.

Mr Player wore a black checked bow tie and Mr Wright a silk mint tie at the historic ceremony, held in cool eight-degree air beside Lake Burley Griffin.

The Bruce couple had approached the event as a renewal of their vows, having taken part in commitment ceremony four years ago, the moment they considered themselves married.

Their language at Saturday’s ceremony was largely the same as then, and they exchanged the same rings, with references to partner simply replaced with husband.

Mr Wright shed tears as he took a phone call from his mother immediately after making his vows.

In a step away from tradition, the "reception" was celebrated first, with guests joining at the couples’ home from 7.30pm for a dinner party.

Mr Player said he had made a rainbow-coloured cake, covered with white icing.

Guests – who had travelled from as far as WA as well as Albury, Sydney and Callala Beach – were then given a card at 9.30pm revealing the ceremony's secret location.

Mr Wright is a public servant with the Department of Immigration and Border Protection and Mr Player an events manager at the Mawson Club.

The threat of the High Court striking down the ACT’s same-sex marriage laws next week was set aside as they exchanged vows and rejoiced with friends beneath the 55 bronze bells of the National Carillon overlooking Lake Burley Griffin.

"To have it finally legalized, it’s a big step for us in our relationship, so we’re just wanting to get it done," Mr Player said before the ceremony.

Mr Wright said the decision to get married in the middle of the night was made not for a grab at history, but to fulfill the words of their celebrant Sharyn Gunn - who performed the couple's commitment ceremony.

"She said the minute it becomes legal, you two are going to be the first I marry," he said.

Mr Player, 30, said he viewed each of the couples making their vows under the ACT's landmark marriage equality law this weekend as the first, but the couple had embraced the prominence of being "12.01" to promote the message of acceptance.

"We’re doing it at midnight because that’s what we want to do … but at the same time we sort of took it in our stride to use it as a bit of marriage equality shining at the same time, and helping get the voice out there that we are no different," he said.

"It’s a bloody giant leap forward for Australia."

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/we-do-at ... z2mjBJgMSh

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by Gob »

The rush is on!
No sooner had marriage celebrant Judy Aulich finished her 11th same-sex ceremony in three days, she was driving to the marriage registry office to lodge the paperwork.

Even if this Thursday's High Court ruling on the ACT's Marriage Equality Act was to invalidate Monday's marriage of Margaret Penrose Clarke and Anne-Marie Delahunt, Ms Aulich wanted to make sure they had a lasting memento.

While it is not known exactly how many couples will have been married by Thursday, 47 lodged their intention to marry in time for their ceremonies to go ahead. The Office of Regulatory Services has guaranteed all couples will receive their official marriage certificates.

During Monday's ceremony at her home in north Canberra, Ms Aulich joked these certificates could become valuable and sold on eBay ''if your superannuation dries up''.

She said that despite the good humour at many of the services, there was some sense of foreboding in case the High Court ruled in favour of the Commonwealth's challenge to ACT law. ''That truly will be deeply disappointing,'' she said.

''All couples understand the risk they are taking but it's important for them to get married at the first possible opportunity.''

Ms Aulich, who has worked as a celebrant since 2007, feels ''very privileged'' to have been involved in the weekend's weddings.

Since Saturday morning, she has celebrated 13 weddings, including 11 same-sex services. ''It's a lovely thing to be exhausted over,'' she said.

The weddings at the weekend had been ''highly charged with emotion'', Ms Aulich said.

''All weddings are joyous, but the weddings at the weekend were exceptionally joyous because of the build-up.

''Same-sex couples want the same rite of passage that everyone else takes for granted.''

Ms Penrose Clarke described herself as a ''very proud Canberran'' and said regardless of Thursday's ruling, she and her wife would have a bigger celebration in two weeks when more family and friends would be able to attend.

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-new ... z2n0hEbMFR
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

dgs49
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by dgs49 »

Horse puckey.

There was nothing preventing them before from pledging their everlasting love and whatever to each other before. They even could have done it in front of witnesses and a religious official. All that has changed (possibly) is the recognition of this arrangement by the government.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17327
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by Scooter »

All that has changed (possibly) is the recognition of this arrangement by the government.
Well duh. The purpose that the legalization of SSM serves is recognition of the arrangement by the government.

Will you next be telling us that the earth revolves around the sun and pretending that you are expressing some profound insight?
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

'Same-sex couples want the same rite of passage
Well, 50% do, anyway.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Canberra first gay weddings, but will they last?

Post by Gob »

Today the High Court decided unanimously that the Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act 2013, enacted by the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory, cannot operate concurrently with the federal Marriage Act 1961. The Court held that the federal Parliament has power under the Australian Constitution to legislate with respect to same sex marriage, and that under the Constitution and federal law as it now stands, whether same sex marriage should be provided for by law is a matter for the federal Parliament.
Shot it down, the wankers.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply