There are lots of potential applications. To start things off, Google lists cooking, cycling, skiing, golf, and firefighting — physical activities where holding a device is impractical if not impossible. But really, it was only a matter of time before people began using it for sex.
The first attempt, an app called Tits and Glass, allowed Glass users to stream pornographic images to their headset. The app was promptly banned from Google's app store, but was recently reinstated.
Now a new app for Glass developed by Lebanese product design student Sherif Maktabi and called Sex with Google Glass lets couples use the wearable technology to record their intimate activities, and — if both partners are wearing a headset — even see sex through their partner's eyes by streaming the view from their respective devices.
The app is controlled through groan-worthy voice commands. For example, saying "Ok Glass, it's time" begins the recording process. Once sex is over, recording is ended by the voice command "Ok Glass, pull out." Video can be replayed for up to five hours before being automatically deleted from the app.
Frankly, I think the idea of having sex while watching a stream from the perspective of your partner sounds narcissistic at best, and mildly disturbing at worst, so I highly doubt that this feature will become immensely popular. And putting a barrier of technology between partners may prove a turnoff and intimacy killer for many.
But Glass as a tool to easily record or stream homemade porn? There is probably a big market for this kind of thing.
Google glass, not all bad then
Google glass, not all bad then
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
I highly doubt his prediction.Frankly, I think the idea of having sex while watching a stream from the perspective of your partner sounds narcissistic at best, and mildly disturbing at worst, so I highly doubt that this feature will become immensely popular.

It reminds of that movie with Sandra Bullock and Sylvester Stallone when they start t have sex via headsets. (forgot the name).
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
How 'bout U?
Have Big Underwear?
Huge Brown Uterus?
Hanging Bun Ulcer?
Have Big Underwear?
Huge Brown Uterus?
Hanging Bun Ulcer?
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
My names not Glass and I'm not done yet.ended by the voice command "Ok Glass, pull out."

- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21138
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
Only half empty, eh?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Google glass, not all bad then
Half full, I am the optimist.