Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by rubato »

Reveals that the Bengazi 'investigations' were 100 % a political snow job:



http://www.vox.com/2015/9/30/9423339/ke ... y-benghazi
A gaffe, in Michael Kinsley's famous formulation, is "when a politician tells the truth — some obvious truth he isn't supposed to say."

On Tuesday night, Rep. Kevin McCarthy — the overwhelming favorite to succeed John Boehner as speaker of the House — made Kinsley proud.

During an appearance on Sean Hannity's Fox News show, McCarthy bragged that the House GOP's investigation into the Benghazi attack had made Hillary Clinton's poll numbers plummet. Furthermore, he presented it as part of a "strategy to fight and win," rather than a nonpartisan effort to find the truth.

Here's what he said, via Roll Call:

What you’re going to see is a conservative speaker, that takes a conservative Congress, that puts a strategy to fight and win. And let me give you one example. Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?

But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen.

"I give you credit for that," Hannity responded. "I'll give you credit where credit is due."
The Select Committee on Benghazi's investigation has long appeared partisan

Several investigations into the Benghazi events have already wrapped up without findings of serious wrongdoing. Yet the House Select Committee on Benghazi has kept at it — and has long appeared unusually focused on Hillary Clinton, and even on a member of her circle who wasn't even in the administration.

In June, the committee interviewed Sidney Blumenthal — a Clinton friend who emailed her advice and information while she was secretary of state, but had no particular useful knowledge about Benghazi — for nine hours. Vox's Jonathan Allen wrote then that they had "jumped the shark," finally stripping away "any pretense that they are more interested in the Benghazi attack than in attacking Hillary Clinton."

Still, the public line from Republicans was that they were merely trying to find the truth about what happened. Without this insistence that the investigation was nonpartisan, it's somewhat tougher for the media and the public to take them seriously.

So McCarthy's flub has overjoyed Democrats long hoping to discredit the investigation. Groups like Media Matters ensured the video was distributed far and wide. Brad Woodhouse of the pro-Clinton group Correct the Record harrumphed to David Weigel, "We have been saying for years that Republicans were exploiting the deaths of four Americans for political gain. Kevin McCarthy just admitted it. Disgraceful."

Comments like McCarthy's — even if they were well understood by most politicos in private — hurt the Select Committee on Benghazi's credibility among people who weren't already biased against it. Its more ambiguous findings, and the more opinionated judgments it issues, will be viewed with more skepticism.

The worst thing about it, although it is not a surprise, is that they are proud of lying and deceiving the public. He actually presented this like it was a job qualification not something shameful.



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by Sue U »

Seriously, did anyone ever think it was anything else?

Politics is no longer (if it was ever) about governing; it is now sheer bloodsport.
GAH!

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

it is now sheer bloodsport
I always prefered "Rollerball".
Image
Jonathan!
Jonathan!
Jonathan!

:mrgreen:

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable
Surprised to see the libs calling that truth but.... :lol:
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by rubato »

So the fact that he is deliberately lying and then bragging about it does not bother you? He and the Republicans have planned to deceive the country about the facts so that future decisions will be even worse than past ones? And you don't think that is shameful?


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Kevin McCarthy accidentally tells the truth.

Post by Lord Jim »

McCarthy may have spoken inartfully, but frankly I'm missing the part where he says there's absolutely no substance or merit to the value of the investigation. (which is how the liberal mainstream media seems to be interpreting it)

What I see McCarthy saying is that there's basically a happy coincidence between political value and factual reality...

Which is perhaps something he shouldn't have pointed out, since it's so easily given to misinterpretation... A misinterpretation that Team Clinton and their minions and supporters in the media have seized upon, and acted as though it were fact. (As has been shown before, Vox.com in particular seems to function as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Clinton campaign.)

I think it's pretty clear that McCarthy's basic point was that if the Benghazi Committee had not been created, all the facts about why Slick Hillie (I like that; I'm thinking I may email it to Maureen Dowd... 8-) ) should be regarded as "untrustworthy" (now being investigated by the FBI) would never have come to light...
ImageImageImage

Post Reply