Ugandan situations defined

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Ugandan situations defined

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Perhaps "odious" is too gentle a word.

Image

http://m.timeslive.co.za/africa/?articleId=7191218
Uganda to pass anti-gay bill: official

Speaker Rebecca Kadaga told The Associated Press on Monday that the bill, which originally mandated death for some gay acts, will become law this year since most Ugandans "are demanding it."

Kadaga said she promised as much before a meeting on Friday of activists who spoke of "the serious threat" posed by homosexuals and demanded the law as "a Christmas gift."

Pepe Julian Onziema, a Ugandan gay activist, said the new push to pass the law was frustrating. President Barack Obama has described the bill as "odious" and some European countries have threatened to cut aid to Uganda if it passes.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Gob »

About time Ugandan aid was cut.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by rubato »

US fundamentalist missionaries have a lot to answer for.

They planted the seeds of this evil, watered and fed it, and made it grow into a nasty social plague.

Every death belongs to them. They are the murderers.




yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I don't know much (hmmm, perhaps anything) about Ugandan situations rubato. Could you stiffen my knowledge with some actual detail about these "fundamentalist" missionaries, their seeds and and their position - the who, the where and the when?

I find a generality such as yours without evidence to be little better than intellectual masturbation. And that I do know something of

Regards
Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Sean »

They were probably Republican missionaries...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Andrew D »

As most of you know, I am not a member of any church. As an agnostic, I would be dishonest if I were to profess adherence to the doctrines of any church.

But I grew up an Anglican (in the US, an Episcopalian). I still have a "filial" attachment to that church, and among my dearest friends are clerics of that church. My late father -- a man of learning and wisdom and compassion and call-to-service rarely matched in my experience -- was a perpetual deacon (an official status, not a failed attempt at priesthood) in that church.

This turns my stomach.

The Anglican church is up to its eyeballs in this.

I can just imagine my Dad -- and he was a very conservative cleric: opposed even to the ordination of women (he called them "she-priests") -- reacting to this.

The thundering of his excoriation.

This was a guy who could make himself heard in a cathedral while barely raising his voice. (He was, for decades, the preferred Great Litanist, because no one ever had the slightest doubt what he was saying. And no believer ever had the slightest doubt whose voice was behind it.)

The thundering of his excoriation.

How dare you?

How dare you?

Deny them Holy Orders? Of course: They are unrepentantly living in sin.

Deny them the sacraments? Yes, if they are unrepentant.

But kill them?

How dare you?

Christ died for the sins of all of us. His sacrifice makes salvation available to all of us.

Who are you to deprive these people of the possibility of repentance and redemption?

Who are you to arrogate unto yourselves the authority of judgment which is God's and God's alone?

How dare you?

The thundering of his excoriation.

It rings in my agnostic heart like my heart's own beating.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

Grim Reaper
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:21 pm

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Grim Reaper »

Apparently a group of American lunatics called The Fellowship has been providing funding to certain Ugandan lawmakers to help get bills like this turned into law.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Interesting take on your own link Grim. Interesting that Pres. Obama's "odious" comment was made at a prayer breakfast sponsored by these lunatics who had apparently not endorsed this particular bill and appear to have "uninvited" the Ugandan sponsor of the bill from their chummy feasts with top US officials.

A bit scarey to me though. The very fact of their secretiveness urges that their "affinity" to Christ Jesus is a great deal less than their "affinity" to totalitarianism. Still they ain't "fundamentalist missionaries" so rubato remains on the hook

Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Andrew D »

You know that things are bad when the fact that the head (or soon-to-be-head) of the Anglican Church in Uganda believes that gay people should be imprisoned is good news:
New Archbishop of Uganda called gays ‘unacceptable’ but opposed death penalty bill

by Stephen Gray
25 June 2012, 6:22pm

The new Archbishop of Uganda has been announced as the Rt Rev Stanley Ntagali, who has spoken out against the death penalty for people convicted of homosexuality in the African state while also calling the sexual orientation “categorically unacceptable”.

The Rt Rev Stanley Ntagali was elected the eighth Archbishop of the Anglican Church of Uganda in a secret ballot last week and will be consecrated in December.

He joined international concern over the death penalty provisions in Uganda’s infamous ‘Kill the gays’ bill in 2009 but has spoken out against homosexuality in the past and backed the prison sentences given for some kinds of gay acts.

Ugandan daily New Vision said at the weekend the new Archbishop’s anti-gay views were “well-known”.

He said in 2009: “Homosexuality is a big issue in Africa. The Bible says that only men of good standing, following the word of Christ can be leaders of the Church. We disagree with our counterparts in England and America, who ordain homosexuals as priests.”

Speaking in reaction to a draft law which would have seen the death penalty introduced for some offences related to gay acts instead of the severe prison sentences currently used, the then-Bishop of Masindi-Kitara said he opposed the death penalty.

The bill condemned for life imprisonment anyone who performed a gay sexual act. It would have given the death penalty to anyone who committed a gay act with a minor, their own child or someone with a disability. They would also be liable for death if they were living with HIV or if they had been convicted of a gay act before.

Bishop Ntagali said in reaction to the 2009 draft law that homosexuality was “categorically unacceptable.”

But, he added: “I think the death penalty is not acceptable. I think taking someone to jail for a period of time would be sufficient.”
That appears to be an improvement over the previous (or on-his-way-out) Archbishop of Uganda, Henry Orombi, as described by Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury -- the head of the entire Worldwide Anglican Communion:
Rowan Williams, Leader of the Anglican Church, Publicly Denounces Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill

by Steve Williams
December 13, 2009
7:00 am

In an interview with the British Telegraph newspaper, the leader of the Anglican Church, the Archbishop of Canterbury, has publicly condemned Uganda’s Anti-Homosexuality Bill that would literally enable the Ugandan government to hound gay men and women to death if the penalty of “aggravated homosexuality” is not removed.

In the interview, Dr. Rowan Williams talks about the schism facing the Anglican Church, his relationship with the Vatican, and also comments on legislation tabled by Ugandan MP David Bahati that has been dubbed the “Kill the Gays Bill”:

“Overall, the proposed legislation is of shocking severity and I can’t see how it could be supported by any Anglican who is committed to what the Communion has said in recent decades,” says Dr Williams. “Apart from invoking the death penalty, it makes pastoral care impossible – it seeks to turn pastors into informers.” He adds that the Anglican Church in Uganda opposes the death penalty but, tellingly, he notes that its archbishop, Henry Orombi, who boycotted the Lambeth Conference last year, “has not taken a position on this bill”.

While this is late in coming, it is an appropriately firm statement that leaves little room for doubt over the Anglican leader’s position as to the Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill.
So the Anglican Church in Uganda wants merely to imprison gay people. And that is an improvement.

Disgusting.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by Lord Jim »

rubato wrote:US fundamentalist missionaries have a lot to answer for.

They planted the seeds of this evil, watered and fed it, and made it grow into a nasty social plague.

Every death belongs to them. They are the murderers.




yrs,
rubato

Yeah, if it weren't for those white preacher men, them darkies wouldn't have been led astray....

Those kaffirs can't be expected to think for themselves... :roll:
ImageImageImage

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Ugandan situations defined

Post by dales »

rubato wrote:US fundamentalist missionaries have a lot to answer for.

They planted the seeds of this evil, watered and fed it, and made it grow into a nasty social plague.

Every death belongs to them. They are the murderers.




yrs,
rubato

Intellectually weak - Bravo, Sir! :ok

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Post Reply