Yes, Prime Minister panned by UK critics
The revival of classic 1980s comedy Yes, Prime Minister has been met with criticism from reviewers.
Written by original creators Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, the updated version stars David Haig as Prime Minister Jim Hacker and Henry Goodman as Cabinet Secretary, Sir Humphrey Appleby.
However critics panned the first episode if the six-part series on Gold.
The Independent said the show was "a beat or two off", adding "further consultation" was required.
"For one thing, you just can't pretend that The Thick of It never happened, as this seemed to do in featuring a scene of political advisers wincing as their boss flounders through an interview," Tom Sutcliffe wrote.
"For another, Henry Goodman can't quite expunge the memory of [original cast member] Nigel Hawthorne's silky perfection."
In its detailed comparison of the original series against the new, the Radio Times concluded the remake was "not even close" to the "untouchable classic".
"Stagey and unsubtle, with nothing new or relevant to say about modern politics and with weaker one-liners," Jack Seale said.
"The new Hacker seems much more aware of Sir Humphrey's scheming, which takes away a key dynamic of the original: Hacker mistakenly thinking he had outsmarted Sir Humphrey and made his own decision," he said.
"Far less artfully constructed and written than the 1980s series."
Website Digital Spy savaged the show, saying: "Sadly, what could have been a triumphant return for one of the best British sitcoms is undone by bad decisions and ruinous execution."
Although it said the first episode contained lines that would make one laugh, it was its only praise.
"Classic Yes, Minister's strength was its timelessness. This reboot feels like its struggling to keep up," Mayer Nissim said.
"They've recycled not only the characters and their mannerisms but also snippets of dialogues and - on occasion - the odd gag. Its creators have sadly strangled the revival at birth."
Mark Monahan of the Daily Telegraph was in the minority who were in praise of the programme, saying "there was much to enjoy", adding the stars were "terrific".
"In the realms of televisual political satire, The Thick of It undeniably feels meaner, more modern, more "now". But, although Yes, Prime Minister shows its age in its polite language, unchanged format, and laughter track, it still has teeth," he said.
The original Yes, Minister and its sequel Yes, Prime Minister series ran from 1980 to 1988 for 38 episodes, starring Paul Eddington as Hacker and Nigel Hawthorne as Sir Humphrey.
Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
Oh goodnight nurse...
What next? A "revival" of Fawlty Towers?
Just a some folks trying to make a quick buck off the memory of a genuine classic....
SHAME!

What next? A "revival" of Fawlty Towers?
Just a some folks trying to make a quick buck off the memory of a genuine classic....
SHAME!



Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
There can be only one Sir Humphrey!!


“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21238
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
LR?
LotR?
'ellr 'ellr 'ellr?
Wot the LR you meaning?
LotR?
'ellr 'ellr 'ellr?
Wot the LR you meaning?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
I'm sure he meant LC
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
I think he was referring to Jim's ongoing, secret vendetta against Long Run.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
Ssssshhhhhhh!
You'll let the cat out of the bag!
You'll let the cat out of the bag!
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
Oh gee, I was hoping that would be kept a secret...I think he was referring to Jim's ongoing, secret vendetta against Long Run.




Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
I guess I was wrong.
I thought it was a reference to Leonard Rohen.
I thought it was a reference to Leonard Rohen.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)
I just assumed he meant Leona Rdcohen.
(Maybe that's how they pronounce it in South Africa...?)
(Maybe that's how they pronounce it in South Africa...?)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God