Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Movies, books, music, and all the arts go here.
Give us your recommendations and reviews.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Gob »

Yes, Prime Minister panned by UK critics

The revival of classic 1980s comedy Yes, Prime Minister has been met with criticism from reviewers.

Written by original creators Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, the updated version stars David Haig as Prime Minister Jim Hacker and Henry Goodman as Cabinet Secretary, Sir Humphrey Appleby.

However critics panned the first episode if the six-part series on Gold.

The Independent said the show was "a beat or two off", adding "further consultation" was required.

"For one thing, you just can't pretend that The Thick of It never happened, as this seemed to do in featuring a scene of political advisers wincing as their boss flounders through an interview," Tom Sutcliffe wrote.

"For another, Henry Goodman can't quite expunge the memory of [original cast member] Nigel Hawthorne's silky perfection."

In its detailed comparison of the original series against the new, the Radio Times concluded the remake was "not even close" to the "untouchable classic".

"Stagey and unsubtle, with nothing new or relevant to say about modern politics and with weaker one-liners," Jack Seale said.

"The new Hacker seems much more aware of Sir Humphrey's scheming, which takes away a key dynamic of the original: Hacker mistakenly thinking he had outsmarted Sir Humphrey and made his own decision," he said.

"Far less artfully constructed and written than the 1980s series."

Website Digital Spy savaged the show, saying: "Sadly, what could have been a triumphant return for one of the best British sitcoms is undone by bad decisions and ruinous execution."

Although it said the first episode contained lines that would make one laugh, it was its only praise.

"Classic Yes, Minister's strength was its timelessness. This reboot feels like its struggling to keep up," Mayer Nissim said.

"They've recycled not only the characters and their mannerisms but also snippets of dialogues and - on occasion - the odd gag. Its creators have sadly strangled the revival at birth."

Mark Monahan of the Daily Telegraph was in the minority who were in praise of the programme, saying "there was much to enjoy", adding the stars were "terrific".

"In the realms of televisual political satire, The Thick of It undeniably feels meaner, more modern, more "now". But, although Yes, Prime Minister shows its age in its polite language, unchanged format, and laughter track, it still has teeth," he said.

The original Yes, Minister and its sequel Yes, Prime Minister series ran from 1980 to 1988 for 38 episodes, starring Paul Eddington as Hacker and Nigel Hawthorne as Sir Humphrey.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Lord Jim »

Oh goodnight nurse... :roll:

What next? A "revival" of Fawlty Towers?

Just a some folks trying to make a quick buck off the memory of a genuine classic....

SHAME!
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Gob »

There can be only one Sir Humphrey!!

Image
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

LR?
LotR?
'ellr 'ellr 'ellr?
Wot the LR you meaning?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11554
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Crackpot »

I'm sure he meant LC
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

or LOL
:lol:

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Sean »

I think he was referring to Jim's ongoing, secret vendetta against Long Run.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11554
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Crackpot »

Ssssshhhhhhh!

You'll let the cat out of the bag!
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Lord Jim »

I think he was referring to Jim's ongoing, secret vendetta against Long Run.
Oh gee, I was hoping that would be kept a secret... :?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15118
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Joe Guy »

I guess I was wrong.

I thought it was a reference to Leonard Rohen.

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Jim, you cannot beat the original!! (not LR or cricket)

Post by Econoline »

I just assumed he meant Leona Rdcohen.

(Maybe that's how they pronounce it in South Africa...?)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

Post Reply