Love letters to Richard Dawkins

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Gob »

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by rubato »

I believe 'people of faith' call that "witnessing" and believe they are winning souls for Christ by doing it.


Self delusion is self-perpetuating.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I didn't bother listening, relying upon someone to clue me in on the content (thanks for that rubato). Apparently these are either moronic or abusive (or both) communications to the Dorkster and I expect rubato is correct again - self-delusion on the part of the writers, accompanied no doubt by considerable ignorance of their own faith.

Pity. Still, God will save who He saves and Dawkins will deter from salvation as many as he can (aided by such letters from those who should know better). Good work if you can get it but so very temporary.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by TPFKA@W »

I laughed so hard at this that the dog and the husband came in to see what was going on. Nearly died when he said, "bitch" as a southern USAian.

Dawkins sets my gaydar off but I read up on his bio and apparently not. :shrug

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Lord Jim »

Dawkins is married to Lalla Ward, an actress who (among other things) played the Dr. Who companion Romana in the Tom Baker series:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0911677/

Image

She is the third Mrs. Dawkins, they've been married since '92.
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by rubato »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:I didn't bother listening, relying upon someone to clue me in on the content (thanks for that rubato). Apparently these are either moronic or abusive (or both) communications to the Dorkster and I expect rubato is correct again - self-delusion on the part of the writers, accompanied no doubt by considerable ignorance of their own faith.

Pity. Still, God will save who He saves and Dawkins will deter from salvation as many as he can (aided by such letters from those who should know better). Good work if you can get it but so very temporary.
"by their works you will know them"


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by BoSoxGal »

I rather believe that God, if one exists, is far more likely to save atheists who refused to buy into the ugliness spewed by so-called 'Christians' than s/he is to save the so-called 'Christians' who have so horribly perverted and twisted the message of love that Christ preached.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Lord Jim »

I'd be willing to bet that high profile Christian proselytizers get the same kind of "fan mail" that this Atheist proselytizer gets...

The Atheist faith has plenty of hateful bile spewers too...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11555
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Crackpot »

But.... But.... They don't count because I agree with them and they do have a point even though it's inartfully made... And look at what those people are doing..... They're much much worse... Why? I don't agree with them.... their point is invalidated by the way they have made it....
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by wesw »

oh, I thought it was "love letters to Richard dawson"...

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Survey say's.......

Big RR
Posts: 14752
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Big RR »

Lord Jim wrote:I'd be willing to bet that high profile Christian proselytizers get the same kind of "fan mail" that this Atheist proselytizer gets...

The Atheist faith has plenty of hateful bile spewers too...
yep, this is like Rush reading selected idiotic fan mail; there are plenty of idiots
to populate any side of any issue.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Lord Jim »

there are plenty of idiots to populate any side of any issue.
Truer words were never spoken...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

bigskygal wrote:I rather believe that God, if one exists, is far more likely to save atheists who refused to buy into the ugliness spewed by so-called 'Christians' than s/he is to save the so-called 'Christians' who have so horribly perverted and twisted the message of love that Christ preached.
Me too, bearing in mind that the ones being saved have done nothing whatsoever to merit being saved but have by grace come to have faith. The faith thing is in there somewhere... 8-)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by rubato »

And religious nutcases have done nothing whatsoever to merit the longer lives and reduced suffering from diseases brought by empirical science but they get to enjoy them anyway.

Even though they persecuted and murdered the very people who have, ultimately, saved them.

We are better than you are. In both the practical and moral senses.



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Jesus loves you, rubato!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Gob »

...and we all know the punchline to that....
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by Lord Jim »

We are better than you are
Maybe the mouse in your pocket is rube, but you're not better than anyone...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by BoSoxGal »

I thought we'd agreed we are all children of the universe, of equal value & import?

Meade, just so you know - I'm a hopeful agnostic who wants very much to believe in a truly loving divine entity. To that end, given that I strive to live by the golden rule and that I beat myself up endlessly when I sin or hurt someone inadvertently or out of excess of pride, I feel pretty confident that if God exists s/he will forgive me my trespasses, including my unwillingness to worship in a building with too many hypocrites in the congregation.

I go to the UU church every now & then, but generally when I want to think on the divine, I go to the mountains or put Bach on the music player.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Love letters to Richard Dawkins

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Always room for one more hypocrite, bsg! One of the things that almost all non-believers and too many Christians (unfortunately) share is not understanding that going to church isn't supposed to make anyone "better" than anyone else. The Christian in the pew is no less of a sinner - no less - than someone who never enters a church. Thieves gonna thieve, liars gonna lie and hypocrites gonna hyp.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply