Is it that a Democrat is the only one who managed never to tell the truth? Is that it? Is it?
Where's my ice cream?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
And Ben Carson and Donald Trump ... even less "mostly true"
Selective reading much?
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Last edited by MajGenl.Meade on Tue Dec 15, 2015 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
dgs49 wrote:A quick look at the party affiliation of the named individuals tells you all you need to know about this "study."
Leftist garbage.
You mean you know the party affiliation of the people who put the article together - Bill Marsh and Angie Drobnic Holan?
Or your take-away is that because the republicans are recorded as telling huge, fat, whopping falsehoods more often than the democrats, truth is "leftist garbage" ?
You are a strange person. Are you wesw?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
If you are able to disprove their claims of what is or is not factual, or the methodology they used to compile it, then have at it. Lobbing sarcastic barbs to cast doubt on the findings isn't a substitute for actually showing how they are wrong.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
This is from the Tampa fact checker, and most conservatives have noted the liberal bias in the facts chosen as well as the analysis. This points out the flaw in the study, namely, the completely subjective selection of facts to check makes this completely unscientific (even if you accept the analysis), though it may well be accurate with respect to any of those on the list.
Any evidence of this alleged liberal bias in the facts and analysis? Or yet again nothing but bald assertion from whining conservatives who scream bias whenever the facts show them for what they are?
Good to see the usual suspects in agreement that denials without evidence constitute "dispassionate, objective, rational analysis". Of course, they would have to, in absence of anything to support their accusations.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell