Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by Gob »

Sarah Palin has sparked outrage by posting pictures on Facebook of her son standing on her dog.

The former Alaska governor described the three images of her six-year-old son Trig using the black Labrador for a stepping stool as 'a symbol of perseverance'.

But the message was met with an instant tirade of anger, with people branding Palin irresponsible.

Image

Image

Image
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15480
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by Joe Guy »

Proof that Sarah Palin is a prejudiced bigot brained KKK member!!!!

She would never had let her son stand on a white dog. The fact that the dog seems to not be affected by the boy is evidence that black dogs know their place in Alaska and accept the fact that they are black.

Typical night with Sarah Palin and her disguised racist husband dressed up to go out for the evening....
Image

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by Lord Jim »

Yeah, the dog looks like he's suffering terribly...Somebody call Animal Rescue....

I ain't a Palin fan, but those who got their "outrage sparked" over this must have outrage that consists of extremely dry tinder...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20177
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by BoSoxGal »

That's definitely not healthy for the dog, even if the dog will tolerate it.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I think it's a symbolic representation of overcoming depression
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20177
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by BoSoxGal »

I think it's merely the musings of a proud mother watching her disabled son figure out how to overcome an obstacle.

But it's pretty reprehensible that she's letting him stand on a living creature long enough to take photos, and not teaching him immediately that standing on an unstable surface, in a way that could cause pain to the dog and/or himself, is a no-no.


By the way, since when did you get an exemption from the use of end punctuation? :nana
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20177
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by BoSoxGal »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:I think it's a symbolic representation of overcoming depression
PS - I *do* get this; I just had some other stuff to say about Ms. Palin's stupidity in neglecting her child's welfare, and about her meanness to her dog - AND I was being a smart ass! :nana
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by rubato »

Trig is the one with Down's syndrome, aka trisomy 21.

The dog is well able to object and refuse service if he chooses to do so. It is a tribute to the sweet temper of Labradors that he is so long-suffering.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by Guinevere »

Not a good habit to get in to -- not every dog will tolerate that and its not good for the animal's spine.

Yes, the lab is a gentle dog and will let its people do almost anything. That doesn't mean you should.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Palin? Irresponsible? Never!!!

Post by rubato »

Guinevere wrote:Not a good habit to get in to -- not every dog will tolerate that and its not good for the animal's spine.

Yes, the lab is a gentle dog and will let its people do almost anything. That doesn't mean you should.
He has Down's syndrome. 'should' is past the point.

Palin and her family have done and said enough dumb things that we don't need to manufacture them out of so little.

It is just depressing that she and Ted Nugent are heroes of the right-wing. Can't we FORCE the red states to improve education some way?

yrs,
rubato

Post Reply