"Being black" is not probable cause

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

Apparently they've only been using their bodycams 4% of the time! :evil:

The cams should be automatically on from start of callout to end of callout, with zero access to the video by police. They should be accessible to prosecutors and civilian police boards only. The police can't be trusted - there are too many brutes & sociopaths and many more who are willing to be silent about them. Police reform NOW!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Gob »

BoSoxGal wrote: I wonder how many civilians the cops in Australia kill every year?

Image

http://theconversation.com/shoot-to-kil ... alia-34578
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

"Being black" is not probable cause

Post by RayThom »

PIKERS!
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15475
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Joe Guy »

Aussie police aren't known for their shooting skills...

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... s-database

US cops killed 1093 citizens in 2016.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9823
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Bicycle Bill »

BoSoxGal wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... s-database

US cops killed 1093 citizens in 2016.
How many of these were persons actually involved in committing a crime and were shot by police to end a crime, or were shot by police because they displayed a weapon or otherwise presented a threat to LEOs after the fact, as opposed to police shootings of an unarmed civilian?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

The Guardian is collecting the stories of the police involved shootings - which aren't tracked by the FBI or any other agency, how fucked up is that?! - so you can read and judge for yourself. I've read some and they don't seem terribly justified on their face to me, and we've seen many publicized cases where the 'justification' was shockingly thin.

We have a REAL problem with our policing in this country, it's not a few bad apples, it's a systemic problem with how police are trained these days and how quick they are to shoot civilians. It's sickening.

I'm a white middle aged woman who worked with police for more than a decade and I don't trust them anymore. When I see a police car I feel a mix of fear and revulsion - and I was raised with blind deference to authority by my retired military father who worked as a prison guard and I have a brother who is a detective, so that's some idea of how far my personal/professional experiences and what I've seen in dozens of real cases I've followed since law school where police brutality or fabrication of evidence or failure to properly investigate or coercion of false confessions have gutted the respect I once had for our system. Our system is a vile mess that victimizes millions and gets by with a bullshit veneer of being 'the greatest ever devised by man' - what a joke. :roll:
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Econoline »

Bicycle Bill wrote:
BoSoxGal wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng- ... s-database

US cops killed 1093 citizens in 2016.
How many of these were persons actually involved in committing a crime and were shot by police to end a crime, or were shot by police because they displayed a weapon or otherwise presented a threat to LEOs after the fact, as opposed to police shootings of an unarmed civilian?
The data from Australia also includes "justified" as well as "unjustified" police shootings...though I doubt there were very many (if any) "unjustified" "police shootings of an unarmed civilian" included in the overall total of *14* police shootings. (For the record, the population of Australia is 24.6 million and the population of the US is 326.6 million: 13 times the population and 78 times the police shootings.)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5842
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

For the record, the population of Australia is 24.6 million and the population of the US is 326.6 million: 13 times the population and 78 times the police shootings.
That 14 is over a four year period while the 1093 is one year's total for the US, based on the data quoted in this thread. So the factor is ((1093/14) / (326.6/24.6) X 4) = 24 (approx - don't have calculator handy). I.e., on a per capita basis you are 24 times more likely to be bumped off by a cop in the USA than you are in Oz.


Edited to correct formatting of quote.
Last edited by ex-khobar Andy on Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Big RR »

The population of Australia is roughly that of NJ, and NJ had 14 shootings in 2016 (from a Washington post link that would not copy for me). Assuming 2016 is not that odd a year for NJ, I would say it is likely NJ has 3-4 times the number of police shootings as Australia. then again, given the prevalence of gun use among inner city gangs, and the number of such inner cities in NJ vs Australia (I haven't been to Australia, but I haven't heard of rampant drug related violence), I would have guessed it would be far worse.

Burning Petard
Posts: 4627
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Burning Petard »

The police/shooter in this case before us had been on the job about 2 years. The police/driver about one year. I predict the investigation will show:

1. More training is needed.

2. The dead woman had a cell phone in her hand. The shooter thought it was a weapon and feared his life was threatened.

3. The shooter will be back on the street with legal permit to kill (the badge) in less than 90 days. Perhaps not with the same police organization.

I have no idea what it will take to shake legitimacy from the heads of jurors for the defense that "I am a cop. I was scared. So of course I had to kill them."

snailgate

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Jarlaxle »

BoSoxGal wrote:I read about this, it's beyond comprehension. It will be sickening to see what kind of story the po-po fabricate about this murder.

Apparently this very nice lady was about to be married to an American, and had lived here for a few years. She was very well liked and apparently was known to have commented to friends and family many times how much nicer it was in Australia where the people aren't all carrying guns.

I wonder how many civilians the cops in Australia kill every year?
The worst part being...if his partner doesn't flip on him, the murdered might walk. Someone on another forum posted exactly how he could do it, and damn if I didn't agree with him.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

Today the news is reporting that the partner was 'stunned' by the shooting - so it appears in this case there may be justice.

Color me cynical, but I notice it's more common for black police to be successfully prosecuted in these abuse of force cases than it is white police. I'm sure it's only a coincidence.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Gob »

The Aussie figures are from 2008 to 2011.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9823
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Bicycle Bill »

BoSoxGal wrote:Today the news is reporting that the partner was 'stunned' by the shooting - so it appears in this case there may be justice.
You're sitting behind the wheel of your patrol vehicle talking to (or about to talk to) someone through the window when suddenly, from less than four feet away, someone fires a gun with the bullet passing within inches of you?  Or perhaps extends their arm so the weapon is directly in front of your face and then pulls the trigger?  I don't think 'stunned' even begins to scratch the surface of the emotions that I would have been feeling in such a situation.

Another significant question — significant to me, anyway — that remains as-yet unanswered is why the weapon was out of its holster and ready for action in the first place.  Or are we to assume that the officer channeled his inner 'Quick-Draw McGraw' and managed to bring out his sidearm, chamber a round, release the safety, aim, and fire, all while seated within the confines of a patrol car?

The incident is under outside investigation by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA).  Latest information being released now reports that according to a statement given by Officer Matthew Harrity (the officer in the driver's seat) he was 'startled by a loud noise' seconds before his partner, Officer Mohamed Noor, fired the fatal shot.  Noor has dummied up (and of course, lawyered up) and as of yet has issued no statement, more than likely upon the advice of his attorney.  Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, in a statement to press following the release of this information by the BCA, noted that police officers cannot be compelled to testify in an outside investigation.  With no other known witnesses other than the victim (and of course, dead women can tell no tales), no further interviews are scheduled, although the usual request — you know, "If there is anyone else who was in the area and witnessed this or can provide additional information they are urged to come forward" — has been issued.

Although I did find it interesting that according to information obtained by Minneapolis TV station KSTP the officer who fired the fatal shot has been on the force for barely a year, graduating from the police academy in May of 2016, and has already had three complaints lodged against him.  One of the complaints was dismissed without disciplinary action; the other two are still open (and under Minnesota state law details of open cases or cases that result in no discipline are not released), so while rumors and innuendoes will no doubt run rampant — especially given the officer's name and point of origin — no further definitive information is likely to forthcoming any time soon.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.  I'll bet you even now the Mipple City police force are praying, holding seances, and possibly even sacrificing virgins in the hopes that something catastrophic happens someplace else and draws the public's attention away from this incident so that the investigations, etc. can sputter along for a couple of years before the matter finally dies and its obituary appears on page 6 of the third section of the Pioneer Press.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

Latest news indicates he's told friends (still no official statement), that he was startled by a loud noise and shot her as she was running toward the police vehicle in the dark with an unidentified object (cell phone) in her hand.

As far as I know, it's always been standard policy for police to issue a verbal warning before discharging a weapon (stop, police!), except under clear circumstances of imminent thread of serious bodily injury/death. Considering that this woman had already mentioned to friends/family numerous times her concerns about weapons and shootings in the US, I can't imagine she wouldn't have stopped dead in her tracks if he'd shouted "stop, police" at her.

So fucking unbelievably unnecessary! :evil:

And this just underscores the feeling that many citizens now have, that the police aren't there to help us, we must fear them; even white middle aged women must be in fear of them, as if that makes a difference - NO citizen regardless of color, creed, gender should be in fear of those who allegedly protect and serve!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

"Being black" is not probable cause

Post by RayThom »

The new crowd chant: "Pajamas On... Don't Shoot"
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Burning Petard
Posts: 4627
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Burning Petard »

Now the Chief of Police has been fired by the mayor.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... rs-request

I am beginning to think that the shooter/policeman is gonna be thrown under the bus to cover up systemic problems. He is a refugee from East Africa, the land of ISIS and clearly not a real 'mericun. The victim of the shooting is a nice female blond who spoke with a fashionable Aussie accent. Fire the boss, now try him for murder, then all the other questionable activities of the prosecutor and the city cops can be papered over.

snailgate

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by Jarlaxle »

The killer is either terrified of his own shadow, totally incompetent, or (most likely) both.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: "Being black" is not probable cause

Post by BoSoxGal »

New signs going up in the area of the manslaughter:

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply