Disastrous pharma ruling
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
You can carp all you want about what should happen, but in the real world, where the rest of us live, doctors' prescribing habits are influenced by a lot of things, including what drug reps tell them and what their patients ask them for.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
- Sue U
- Posts: 9101
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
Let's take a real world example of highly advertised drugs -- for example, Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. There are no generics. All produce similar physiological results. Which does a doc prescribe? Why?
GAH!
- Sue U
- Posts: 9101
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
Are you aware that generic drugs are not actualy the same as brand-name, and that there can be wide variability in therapeutic effectiveness?Joe Guy wrote:If it was the best treatment, then he wouldn't necessarily need to prescribe Curesitall. He could prescribe a generic alternative
GAH!
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
A good doctor first tests to see what the cause is for the patient's problem. Assuming that he decides a prescription is a good treatment, he then researches the contraindications of each drug and potential interactions with other drugs and then prescribes what he thinks is best for the patient.Sue U wrote:Let's take a real world example of highly advertised drugs -- for example, Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. There are no generics. All produce similar physiological results. Which does a doc prescribe? Why?
As an aside - I get advertisements for generic Viagra & Cialis (and many other drugs) on-line sometimes in my spam folder. I don't know whether they're real or not.
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
I'm aware that there can be differences in effectiveness between generic and brand name drugs although I believe that wouldn't apply to the majority of them. A good doctor would know that and prescribe accordingly.Sue U wrote:Are you aware that generic drugs are not actualy the same as brand-name, and that there can be wide variability in therapeutic effectiveness?
Also, "variability in therapeutic effectiveness" doesn't always mean that the brand name is the most effective.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
Let's take a real world example of highly advertised drugs -- for example, Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. There are no generics. All produce similar physiological results. Which does a doc prescribe? Why?
It's not hard . . . to choose . . .

or

or

For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Disastrous pharma ruling
There is excellent social psychology research dating back > 30 years which proves that all of the cheap 'freebies' work. Free medical books, free desk toys, free pads, pens, stethoscopes. They all have a huge effect on behavior even when the subject claim they don't. And I'm not getting to the outright bribery of free trips, speaking honoraria (where they provide the script and the presentations).Sue U wrote:Let's take a real world example of highly advertised drugs -- for example, Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. There are no generics. All produce similar physiological results. Which does a doc prescribe? Why?
Kaiser eliminates all such contact between MDs and pharma representatives. They do allow medical device/drug makers to have Kaiser Doc give technical presentations in-house (no travel, no free meals, no speaking fees). Such as Implanon, a long-term birth control drug which is implanted in the arm.
yrs,
rubato