On being a "gentleman".

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2013 ... /?smid=fb-...


I Don’t Want My Preschooler to Be a ‘Gentleman’
By LYNN MESSINA
My 4-year-old son, Emmett, swallows a spoonful of cereal and asks me if I know what a gentleman is. Surprised, I tell him I have some idea; then I ask what the word means to him.

“A gentleman lets girls go first,” he says, explaining that every day at naptime all the girls go to the bathroom before the boys.

His explanation, along with the quiet solemnity with which he delivers it, is completely endearing and yet it makes my heart ache. This adorable little boy, who is only beginning to learn the ways of the world, just got his first lesson in sexism — and from a teacher who, I don’t doubt, believes she’s doing something wonderful for womankind.

She isn’t the only one.

Start to complain about your preschooler adopting gentlemanly behavior and you quickly discover how out of step you are with the rest of the world. Almost everyone I mention it to thinks it’s lovely and sweet. What’s the harm in teaching little boys to respect little girls?

The implication, of course, is that I’m overreacting, and as a parent, I’ll admit to being prone to the occasional bout of hypersensitivity. For months, I grumbled that the inappropriately breathy tone of Cinderella on Emmett’s LeapFrog Princess laptop was warping a generation of impressionable young minds.

But I don’t think it’s an overreaction to resent the fact that your son is being given an extra set of rules to follow simply because he’s a boy. His behavior, already constrained by a series of societal norms, now has additional restrictions. Worse than that, he’s actively being taught to treat girls differently, something I thought we all agreed to stop doing, like, three decades ago. That the concept of selective privilege has been introduced in preschool of all places — the inner sanctum of fair play, the high temple of taking turns — is mind-boggling to me. How can you preach the ethos of sharing at the dramatic play center and ignore it 20 feet away at the toilet?

Yet as much as this double standard offends me as a mom, it’s nothing compared with how much it infuriates me as a feminist. Forty years after the tender, sweet, young thing in “Free to Be You and Me” gets eaten by a pack of hungry tigers after asserting that ladies should go first, we are still insisting on empty courtesies that instill in women a sense of entitlement for meaningless things. Many women see gallantry as one of the benefits of their sex; I see it as one of its consolations.

Letting girls use the bathroom first isn’t a show of respect. It is, rather, the first brick in the super high pedestal that allows men to exalt women out of sight. A true show of respect is paying us equally for the same work, not 77 cents on the dollar, which is the current average. That’s the world I want my son to live in and I seriously doubt it will ever happen as long as women believe men should hold the door open for them.

Global economic considerations aside, the real tragedy is that these girls aren’t being taught the fine art of yielding to others. Nobody is giving them the opportunity to be gallant. Instead, these fabulous little creatures, who absorb everything joyfully and tear through barriers gleefully, are being fitted for the same old corset. The stays are a little looser but the whalebone is just as rigid.

And this is why my heart aches when I listen to Emmett proudly explain what a gentleman is — because what he’s actually so proud of is his part in perpetuating millenniums of sexism.

So while he finishes his bowl of cereal, I tell him that I think a gentleman lets other people go first. If two boys reach the top of the slide at the same time, a gentleman lets the other one go first. Furthermore, I say, it would be very nice if his teacher decided to alternate on a daily basis who uses the bathroom first at naptime. The girls, I assure him, wouldn’t mind waiting a few extra minutes and it would give them a chance to feel gentlemanly. But the concept of a gentlemanly girl is beyond him and he shakes his head.

It’s churlish to argue, so I let it go, and when, a few hours later in the park, I see him grab his soccer ball from a girl his own age, I feel a ridiculous rush of relief at his ungentlemanly behavior. Then I cross the field to remind him yet again how to share.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

She thinks too much.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Lord Jim »

explaining that every day at naptime all the girls go to the bathroom before the boys.
Well that makes sense...

They take longer...

Might as well learn that young... ;)
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by rubato »

“A gentleman lets girls go first,” he says, explaining that every day at naptime all the girls go to the bathroom before the boys."

A gentlemen lets others go first (which she does get around to). The act is most notable when those others are physically less capable and thus the deference is provably that of civility and not merely a means of avoiding conflict. ( which she does not) Women are physically less capable and less aggressive than men and she objects that this fact underlies a significant symbolic part of the gesture.

Get the hell over it.



yrs,
rubato

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Get the hell over it.
I agree. :ok

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Econoline »

rubato wrote:
“A gentleman lets girls go first,” he says, explaining that every day at naptime all the girls go to the bathroom before the boys."
A gentlemen lets others go first (which she does get around to). The act is most notable when those others are physically less capable and thus the deference is provably that of civility and not merely a means of avoiding conflict. ( which she does not) Women are physically less capable and less aggressive than men and she objects that this fact underlies a significant symbolic part of the gesture.
:ok Well said. (except that I would have put "usually" at the beginning of that last sentence.)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

. it is almost the definition of a gentleman that he is one who never inflicts pain... He has eyes on all his company; he is tender towards the bashful, gentle towards the distant, and merciful to the absurd ... he is seldom prominent in conversation, and never wearisome.... He never speaks of himself except when compelled, never defends himself by a mere retort, has no ears for slander or gossip ... and interprets everything for the best. He is never mean or little in his disputes ... he observes the maxim of an ancient sage, that we should ever conduct ourselves towards our enemy as if he were one day to be our friend. He has too much good sense to be affronted by insults... He is a friend of religious tolerance ,,, not only because his philosophy has taught him to look upon all forms of faith with an impartial eye, but also from the gentleness and effeminacy of feeling which is the attendant on civilization....'

Newman's remarks on 'being a gentleman' in "The Idea of a University", (Discourse 8, section 10)
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Lord Jim »

While some of those qualities are certainly laudable, I have to say that others in the list sound more like a doormat than a "gentleman"...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

You would! :D
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Econoline »

Lord Jim wrote:While some of those qualities are certainly laudable, I have to say that others in the list sound more like a doormat than a "gentleman"...
Well, in Cardinal Newman's defense, I have to point out that he wrote that in Victorian England, a century and a half ago.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Miles
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Butler Pa, USA

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Miles »

I think being a gentleman can be summed up by two words, "good manners" no matter what century you are living in. ;)
I expect to go straight to hell...........at least I won't have to spend time making new friends.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Miles wrote:I think being a gentleman can be summed up by two words, "good manners" no matter what century you are living in. ;)
:ok :clap:
Nor whom they are directed to (male or female).
Excellent Miles.
:ok

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Econoline »

Of course that merely substitutes the question "What are 'good manners'?" for the question "What is a 'gentleman'?"
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

A gentleman has good manners.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

Does he fuck! ;)
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Econoline »

Of course he does...and afterwards he lets the girl use the bathroom first. :D
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by dales »

He even lets her change the bed sheets. :mrgreen:

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Guinevere »

Econoline wrote:Of course he does...and afterwards he lets the girl use the bathroom first. :D
That's after he makes sure she comes first. And last.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by Gob »

and always....
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: On being a "gentleman".

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

And cuddles

Post Reply