THE 3% of the UK population without tattoos faces discrimination in job interviews and social situations.
According to research by the Institute for Studies, non-tattooed people are likely to be labelled ‘freaks’, ‘perverts’ or ‘attention-seeking non conformists’.
Engineering company boss Tom Booker said: “Like everyone these days I have various bits of body art covering my arms and back.
“If someone comes to me for a job and they’re not inked in at least three places, I have to ask myself some questions.
“Do they think they’re somehow ‘special’? Are they into weird music and alternative lifestyle choices? Also, are they going to upset any potential clients who visit to see non-tattooed people in positions of responsibility?”
24-year-old Emma Bradford said: “I don’t regret not getting any tattoos but it can make it hard to fit into the mainstream.
“I try to cover up my arms for job interviews so that employers can’t see I don’t have pictures of cartoon animals saying ‘Fuck’ or Chinese proverbs on them.
“But if I’m asked about tattoos I have to come clean and say I don’t even have a tramp stamp.”
Bar owner Nikki Hollis said: “Would I employ someone without tats? Yes, but I’d keep them away from the general public, maybe washing up or something.
“But I’ve got several non-tattooed friends and despite what people say they are really nice, normal people.”
Tatts discrimination
Tatts discrimination
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Tatts discrimination
HUH?
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Tatts discrimination
I think it's a put-on, Dale.....
I mean, "The Institute for Studies"??? Come on, now, that's a giveaway right off the bat.

I mean, "The Institute for Studies"??? Come on, now, that's a giveaway right off the bat.

People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Tatts discrimination
That and it being placed in laughs
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Tatts discrimination
Only 3% of the people in the UK DO NOT have tatoos?
Right there, whatever comes next is not to be trusted.

Right there, whatever comes next is not to be trusted.
-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Tatts discrimination
I always called it "reading material".I don’t even have a tramp stamp

Re: Tatts discrimination
Econoline wrote:I think it's a put-on, Dale.....
I mean, "The Institute for Studies"??? Come on, now, that's a giveaway right off the bat.
I knew it all along!Crackpot » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:31 am
That and it being placed in laughs

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato