Ban the person above you.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Econoline because I had a random thought that involved banning someone.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Joe for moving this thread to page 23 before I got the chance to....



-
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Jim cause he missed his chance
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban oldr because he might have hurt Jim's feelings...
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Joe for not realizing he hurt Old's feelings by accusing him of hurting Jim's feelings.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Long Run because I don't understand what he just wrote...
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban the person posting below this for the sake of variety and because Kristina is too nice to ban again.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban @W, and since this is the post below hers I'm already banned...so the next person in line can just go ahead and ban her again.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Ban the person above you.
I''m going to skip past Econo and @W to ban Kristina, because she has been left unbanned.



Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Lord Jim for over extending his ban-width.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21323
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
I embargo Joe for using a cricket term in banning LJ (such cruelty) and for being one hyphen short of a picnic
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Ban the person above you.
In order to bring creativity to the thread I ban the person who posts 3 posts below this posting .
- Beer Sponge
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:31 pm
Re: Ban the person above you.
I shall attempt the rare double ban, and ban MGM and @W, and restore order to the universe. 

Personally, I don’t believe in bros before hoes, or hoes before bros. There needs to be a balance. A homie-hoe-stasis, if you will.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Beer Sponge in order to maintain the order he has restored to the universe.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- Beer Sponge
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:31 pm
Re: Ban the person above you.
Thank you Econoline. Now I ban you, because it is possible you are not wearing pants. I know Reagan isn't!!!! 

Personally, I don’t believe in bros before hoes, or hoes before bros. There needs to be a balance. A homie-hoe-stasis, if you will.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban BS for banning econoline whilst already being banned previously by my earlier ban.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban @W for being the third person to post after she said she was banning the third person to post...
Well, fourth actually....
Well, fourth actually....



Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Lord Jim for not banning @W for calling me a nasty little motherf*cker and heartless turd.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban LJ for trying to confuse the issue.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21323
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
And I ostracise TPFKA@W for not pointing out to LJ that she was in fact the third "person" to post because Beer Sponge posted twice and he's only one person, not two, so it was BS, Econo and then TPFKA@W being the third person, singular and she didn't say "third post" at all so although hers was the fourth post she was the third person to post after she said "third person" and not the fourth person to post after she said "third person". It's the same thing that got Harry Lime into such trouble, tsk tsk.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts