Took it a second time (a friend posted it in Facebook) and got a different, but equally applicable result - it seems like the test has picked up both my softer and my tougher sides:
Dynamic Thinkers are confident and independent persons. They radiate enthusiasm and energy. Dynamic Thinkers pursue their objectives actively and energetically. They love nothing better than new challenges. This type is the born leader, competent, energetic and responsible.
They have a sharp eye for errors and can criticise without mercy if they see the success of a project endangered. They are completely unconcerned as to whether they alienate anyone in the process. But they are always open to objective arguments; they love discussions, they are very gifted rhetorically and they are good at convincing and enthusing others.
As they are very sociable, Dynamic Thinkers like to have a lot of friends around them, preferably those with whom they can share their interests and discuss all sorts of subjects. They are very direct but never in an underhand or scheming manner. If you can bear being spoken to frankly, you have in them a loyal and unwavering advisor as friend. Everything new and unknown stimulates Dynamic Thinkers and awakens their curiosity. However, rules, routine and traditional things arouse their resistance. If something does not go the way they want it to, they can react rather pigheadedly and obstinately.
Dynamic Thinkers expect a great deal of themselves and of others. Whoever does not fit in with their scheme of things does not have it easy. They sometimes appear to be rather severe due to their frankness. Partners and family also find it difficult to satisfy Dynamic Thinkers. They know exactly what they want and compromising is inconceivable to them. Whoever has an Dynamic Thinker as partner should have a strong personality and have a great deal of independence and sufficient self-confidence in order to give this dominating type some opposition. Normally, for Dynamic Thinkers, a partnership only takes second place after their profession. But they like to have someone at their side who is a match for them intellectually, with whom they can pursue mutual objectives and have interesting discussions all night long; preferably factual discussions - sentimentalism and romance are not their thing.
Adjectives that describe your type
extroverted, theoretical, logical, planning, rational, self-confident, ambitious, direct, open, severe, organised, determined, witty, independent, purposeful, dynamic, energetic, optimistic, competent, responsible, clever, intellectual, enthusiastic, demanding, structured, controlled, aggressive
What is your personality type?
Re: What is your personality type?
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: What is your personality type?
I'm With Joe.
Or should I say I'm not?
Or should I say I'm not?
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: What is your personality type?
I did it again and I'm still an "Analytical Thinker".
Very odd and unsatisfying "test"...the blocks of 10 statements were very uneven. If I agreed with all 10 in one group and none in the other it counts the same as if I agreed with 6 in one group and 4 in the other, or 4 in one group and 3 in the other.
My first thought was that it was somewhat (but not 100%) accurate; my second opinion was that "Reliable Realist" (as quoted by Meade) feels more accurate; my third and final offer (BTW, I didn't see "indecisive" anywhere in anyone's list of adjectives
): I'm with rubato in wanting to redesign the test to be more accurate.
Very odd and unsatisfying "test"...the blocks of 10 statements were very uneven. If I agreed with all 10 in one group and none in the other it counts the same as if I agreed with 6 in one group and 4 in the other, or 4 in one group and 3 in the other.
My first thought was that it was somewhat (but not 100%) accurate; my second opinion was that "Reliable Realist" (as quoted by Meade) feels more accurate; my third and final offer (BTW, I didn't see "indecisive" anywhere in anyone's list of adjectives
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE
The Groundbreaking Thinker
http://www.ipersonic.com/type/GT.html
SueU and LJ -- I knew we had a lot in common. I feel much goes towards my background in theater arts. On the other hand, I couldn't help but feel this was almost like a cold read by a psychic. (I went to one at the Asbury Park boardwalk in the late '60s, however.)
My Type:
"... dyslexic, extroverted, theoretical, logical, spontaneous, rational, innovative, intellectual, open, independent, curious, enterprising, analytical, clever, enthusiastic, venturesome, inventive, energetic, sociable, optimistic, non-conformist, creative, freedom-loving, charming, able to get enthusiastic, self-confident, communicative, capricious, inconsistent, outgoing..."
Career Advice:
This is a fairly close assessment but forced retirement fourteen years ago no doubt put the projection on hold.
OK, now that I've replied it's time to kill this thread. RIP
http://www.ipersonic.com/type/GT.html
SueU and LJ -- I knew we had a lot in common. I feel much goes towards my background in theater arts. On the other hand, I couldn't help but feel this was almost like a cold read by a psychic. (I went to one at the Asbury Park boardwalk in the late '60s, however.)
My Type:
"... dyslexic, extroverted, theoretical, logical, spontaneous, rational, innovative, intellectual, open, independent, curious, enterprising, analytical, clever, enthusiastic, venturesome, inventive, energetic, sociable, optimistic, non-conformist, creative, freedom-loving, charming, able to get enthusiastic, self-confident, communicative, capricious, inconsistent, outgoing..."
Career Advice:
This is a fairly close assessment but forced retirement fourteen years ago no doubt put the projection on hold.
OK, now that I've replied it's time to kill this thread. RIP

“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”