Anyone planning on watching this?

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
Post Reply
User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11554
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Crackpot »

Bill Nye/Ken Hamm debate

I am sad to say I hope Nye mops the floor with Hamm. Creation Science is a bane on Christianity.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Gob »

Ham on Nye, any mustard? :D
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Lord Jim »

Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I will try to catch it. While I believe there is a case to be made for special creation, I don't think that "The Creation Museum" sort of approach (Genesis or bust!) is correct. If this chap Hamm (or either of his two brothers, Shemm and Momm) show up with "the earth is only 8,000 years old" and "all of creation took 6 days" then that is indeed a bane on anything, perhaps especially Christianity. The existence of God (hence creation) cannot be exhaustively proved or disproved by any argumentation or physical "proofs". Within those parameters, it is (and can only be) a discussion of probabilities.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11554
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Crackpot »

Yes they are 6 day creationists
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11554
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Crackpot »

Literal 6 day creation doesn't even make sense from a biblical standpoint since the sun isn't created until the third or fourth day
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Lord Jim »

The fourth day, I was just about to make that point...(which to me has always conveyed the point that The Bible itself tells you, within the first few passages, that it cannot be interpreted in a strictly literal way...)

"Let there be light" has always sounded an awful lot like The Big Bang to me...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Gob »

That's jumped the shark these days.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Anyone planning on watching this?

Post by Lord Jim »

I know I've pointed this out before, but The Big Bang Theory was initially posited by a Jesuit Priest:
Monseigneur Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, ( 17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966) was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Université catholique de Louvain.[1] He was the first person to propose the theory of the expansion of the Universe, widely misattributed to Edwin Hubble.[2][3] He was also the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.[4][5][6][7] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his 'hypothesis of the primeval atom'.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre

Image
ImageImageImage

Post Reply