Five for one

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Five for one

Post by BoSoxGal »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:oops - Johnson and surely Tyler gets some credit even if he chose the wrong side?
Admittedly my knowledge of presidential history isn't encyclopedic, but I wasn't aware either of them ran for public office after the presidency, and Wiki isn't helping me clarify. Can you?
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Five for one

Post by Lord Jim »

Tyler was elected to the Confederate Congress from Virginia after Virginia seceded (that's what Meade refers to by "the wrong side") however he died before he actually took his seat...

Andrew Johnson returned to the Senate from Tennessee in the 1870's...

As I recall he didn't live very long after that election either...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Five for one

Post by BoSoxGal »

Ahhh, okay. I looked up the wrong President Johnson, and overlooked the bit about the Confederacy in Tyler's Wiki entry.

I used to be able to name all the Presidents in order of their presidencies. Oh, to have the memory ability of a youth again.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Five for one

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

bigskygal wrote: Oh, to have the memory ability of a youth again.
Of a what? :shrug
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Five for one

Post by Econoline »

This is relevant to the nominal subject of this thread.

I'm just going to post this without comment:
Image
(source1)
(source2)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Five for one

Post by Sue U »

Stupidest Man on the Internet still stupid.
GAH!

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Five for one

Post by Econoline »

Finally! Someone on Fox News who I can agree with!
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Five for one

Post by Sue U »

But but but ... it would be irresponsible not to speculate!
GAH!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Five for one

Post by BoSoxGal »

Wow - I didn't realize any amount of reason still existed at that channel! Thanks for sharing that clip, Econoline. :ok
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11657
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Five for one

Post by Crackpot »

Shep has a history of going rouge when the rest of the channel goes too far off the rails.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15386
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Five for one

Post by Joe Guy »

Crackpot wrote:Shep has a history of going rouge when the rest of the channel goes too far off the rails.
He certainly does have his own make up.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Five for one

Post by Lord Jim »

Going Rouge

Wasn't that the autobiography of a cross dresser who made a living doing Sarah Palin impersonations? :D
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Five for one

Post by rubato »

1 voice of reason vs 9 (I think that was the count in the video but its not exact) screaming republican jackasses. One out of ten total so we get a percent composition of reason of 1/10 or 10% reason.

FOX is 10% reason! 90% Hysterical Republican Bullshit.

Better than usual for the all-GOP channel.

And we proved it with science and numbers and stuff!



yrs,
rubaot

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Five for one

Post by Lord Jim »

I've been meaning to catch up on this topic...

A few thoughts...

First of all, we don't have to "speculate" as to whether or not Bergdahl deserted his post; that's an established fact...

An army investigation conducted in 2010 determined that, and some of the folks who have been "yackety yaking" are members of his unit who were there serving with him when he deserted his post, and to a man they say he deserted his unit...

Now, whether or not what he did constitutes "desertion" rather than "going AWOL" under the UCMJ remains to be determined, but clearly it must be one or the other...

My guess, (well okay, "speculation"... 8-) ) is that when this is finally sorted out, the argument his attorney will make will be a "diminished capacity" defense (given the emails he sent, that would seem to be the way to go)

(Accusing him of being a "traitor" certainly seems over the top; given the fact that he was held in isolation without any other POWs, and that his Taliban captors are the only other witnesses to his behavior in captivity, a charge of "treason" would seem somewhat problematic to me...)

I expect his lawyer will argue that he had given lots of indication that he should have been removed from his unit, and that the Army should have taken him off the line for a psych evaluation...


Moving along...

I saw where The President said this week that a "prisoner exchange" is what happens at "the end of a war"...

Really? Is this war over? Has anyone told the Taliban? The last time I checked, they were still shooting at us...

And then of course there's the fact that The President flagrantly violated the law...(Interesting that we don't see any of the folks who had their hair on fire over "Iran -Contra" upset over this...)

Under the law, he was legally required to give Congress 30 days notice before he released any prisoners from Gitmo; in this case he released five high ranking Taliban officials with no notice at all, even to the Chairmen and ranking members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees...(He's even managed to piss off Diane Feinstein over that...)

The Administration, and Obama himself, is going to have to answer for that one...

And on the topic of "no soldier left behind"...

That's an important principle, but it's not an overarching be all and end all principle...

What if, in order to "not leave this soldier behind" the Taliban had insisted on enriched uranium, or weaponized antharx?

I suspect the Administration would have declined...(Though after the way they bungled Syria, it's tough to know what the outer boundary for crazy incompetence is with this bunch...)

And finally, on the issue of hypocrisy....

There are obvious "Blame Obama all the time no matter what" idiots out there, (like the fellow who Econo provided links for) who make their living feeding off of anti-Obama sentiment...

But I have seen some in the liberal media try to put John McCain in this group...

In February, McCain said on Anderson Cooper's show that if a prisoner swap was offered for Bergdahl, that it was something that "should be considered" but that he would need to "see the details"....

So now he's seen the "details" (the five highest ranking Taliban officials we're holding being released) and the "details" well, suck, and he's opposed to it...

No hypocrisy there...

The bottom line is that somebody in the Administration thought this would be a triumphant moment, (thus the Rose Garden Ceremony) and it has turned out to be a complete cluster fuck...The victory cigars they thought they were lighting up turned out to be exploding cigars...

My personal suspicion is, (as I have mentioned before) that like all second term Presidencies, Obama no longer has his "A Team" working for him, ( neither his political A Team or his Cabinet A Team; they've all moved on) and he is being ill-served by the advice he is getting from the second-stringers...

If David Axelrod were still in The White House, he'd have said to Obama, "Mr President, this five top Taliban leaders in exchange for a POW with a dodgy story is a really bad idea. You shouldn't do it."

But there's no one in The White House now who has that kind of gravitas any more...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sun Jun 08, 2014 3:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Five for one

Post by BoSoxGal »

rubato wrote:1 voice of reason vs 9 (I think that was the count in the video but its not exact) screaming republican jackasses. One out of ten total so we get a percent composition of reason of 1/10 or 10% reason.

FOX is 10% reason! 90% Hysterical Republican Bullshit.

Better than usual for the all-GOP channel.

And we proved it with science and numbers and stuff!



yrs,
rubaot
I have missed your particular brand of clever, rubato.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Five for one

Post by Lord Jim »

I have missed your particular brand of clever, rubato.
I enjoy it every day...

Yes, he certaintly has a "particular brand of clever" ... :D
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Five for one

Post by rubato »

bigskygal wrote:
rubato wrote:1 voice of reason vs 9 (I think that was the count in the video but its not exact) screaming republican jackasses. One out of ten total so we get a percent composition of reason of 1/10 or 10% reason.

FOX is 10% reason! 90% Hysterical Republican Bullshit.

Better than usual for the all-GOP channel.

And we proved it with science and numbers and stuff!



yrs,
rubaot
I have missed your particular brand of clever, rubato.
And I have missed you, but I had hoped you would find a more healthful, clever, and nurturing community of friends than this. I still do.



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Five for one

Post by Gob »

rubato wrote:And I have missed you, but I had hoped you would find a more healthful, clever, and nurturing community of friends than this. I still do.



yrs,
rubato
Image
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15386
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Five for one

Post by Joe Guy »

rubato wrote: FOX is 10% reason! 90% Hysterical Republican Bullshit.
Fox is a bit Hysterical but I believe it's more of a case of anti-Obama people getting too excited and suffering from Premature Expectoration.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20047
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Five for one

Post by BoSoxGal »

Joe Guy wrote:
rubato wrote: FOX is 10% reason! 90% Hysterical Republican Bullshit.
Fox is a bit Hysterical but I believe it's more of a case of anti-Obama people getting too excited and suffering from Premature Expectoration.
Ha ha ha - Joe Guy, your brand of clever can be pretty hilarious, too! :lol:

I only see FOX in clips on the web and on The Daily Show/Colbert Report; I can't imagine what it would be like to work in a bar or otherwise be somewhere that it played ALL DAY LONG.

It's mind-numbing propaganda meant to brainwash those who lack critical thinking skills - and it's clearly terrifically effective, at least on the people I see on a daily basis in this 80% Republican rural Montana county.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply