No Laughing Matter...

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11667
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: No Laughing Matter...

Post by Crackpot »

At least not yet...
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: No Laughing Matter...

Post by Econoline »

Lord Jim wrote:
Pentacostals have a female "uniform".
There are a number of conservative Christian sects that mandate modest and even "uniform" type dress for their female members...and sometimes male members too (like the Amish)
Not to mention the Mormons, with their magic underwear... :lol:
Lord Jim wrote:The big difference is they don't have the power of the state to back them up and force every woman to adhere to their dress codes whether they want to or not, under penalty of criminal punishment...
True. Perhaps I should have used the word "theocracy" instead of--or in addition to--the word "fundamentalism" in my "correction" above.

ETA: on second thought, religious fundamentalism--with or without state power behind it--really is the problem. Just look at the Buddhist fundamentalist violence against Muslims in Burma/Myanmar for a surprising (and depressing) example.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11667
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: No Laughing Matter...

Post by Crackpot »

extremist would be best. Fundamentalist really only means adherent to core beliefs. while all extremists would claim (at least) to be fundamentalists all fundamentalists are not extremists.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply