So that's where he disappeared to

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Lord Jim »

I imagine that in Kansas, they'll correct this glitch in the law pretty quickly...
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Big RR »

Or not; absent some sort of lascivious behavior, what's the big hang up on nudity? I might not want a nude person sitiing on a restaurant chair before me, but walking down the street? So what?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Lord Jim »

Well, we've been 'round and 'round on this before, and as I'm sure you know, you can put me solidly in the camp of those who finds requiring people not to parade their rashy asses and naughty bits on public streets as a very reasonable and minimal sacrifice to make for public decorum. (Lord knows we have few enough of them)

I'd bet that most folks in Kansas will see it that way as well. I don't know when the Kansas legislature is next set to meet, but I would expect that as soon as it does, legislation covering (so to speak) this will swiftly sail through with wide bi-partisan support and be immediately signed into law by the Governor.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by TPFKA@W »

I see lots and lots of naked, ain't no big thang. However, private parts leak germy juicy things and that is pretty disgusting. See this important bit of scientific observation:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/serio ... _3lwmOwQmJ

So, clearly, farts need filtering by some method.

Additionally, I would rather see nekid bits parading around than see/hear people hoarking up big phlem-balls and spitting them out. That ought to be illegal.

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Big RR »

Jim--I'm not saying that the requirement of wearing some sort of clothing is unreasonable, just that I'm not all that bothered by public nudity. There are a lot of other things to get upset about before that.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Lord Jim »

I also found this comment somewhat puzzling:
That's because it is actually somewhat legal to be nude, in public, in Kansas. Shawnee County Sheriff Herman Jones says the state statutes are pretty clear on this issue.

"Unless someone is exposing themselves or sexual organ to gratify or arouse someone other than themselves...it's really not anything against the law," said Jones.
http://www.kmbz.com/Outrage-over-naked- ... e/19776857

Perhaps the sheriff just phrased that inartfully, but that would seem to indicate that the way this particular law is written, even walking around in public sporting an erection or masturbating wouldn't necessarily be illegal, so long as the nekkid person's intent was only to arouse themselves... :?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Beer Sponge
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:31 pm

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Beer Sponge »

Come on Jim, you know you want to hang out with me in Kansas! :nana
Personally, I don’t believe in bros before hoes, or hoes before bros. There needs to be a balance. A homie-hoe-stasis, if you will.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Lord Jim »

I'll pass on that BS, but I'm sure you've already booked your plane tickets... :P
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Beer Sponge
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:31 pm

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Beer Sponge »

How did you know? :lol:
Personally, I don’t believe in bros before hoes, or hoes before bros. There needs to be a balance. A homie-hoe-stasis, if you will.

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Big RR »

Lord Jim wrote:I'll pass on that BS, but I'm sure you've already booked your plane tickets... :P
Gives a new meaning to the word cockpit.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by Lord Jim »

Maybe Shirley Phelps-Roper will start walking around naked on the streets of Topeka:

Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20177
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: So that's where he disappeared to

Post by BoSoxGal »

Lord Jim wrote:I also found this comment somewhat puzzling:
That's because it is actually somewhat legal to be nude, in public, in Kansas. Shawnee County Sheriff Herman Jones says the state statutes are pretty clear on this issue.

"Unless someone is exposing themselves or sexual organ to gratify or arouse someone other than themselves...it's really not anything against the law," said Jones.
http://www.kmbz.com/Outrage-over-naked- ... e/19776857

Perhaps the sheriff just phrased that inartfully, but that would seem to indicate that the way this particular law is written, even walking around in public sporting an erection or masturbating wouldn't necessarily be illegal, so long as the nekkid person's intent was only to arouse themselves... :?
There is language like that in the model law, but usually, gratifying oneself also meets the elements of the offense, even if you are grossing out others in the process (oftentimes, they 'get off' because of grossing other people out - it's like a mental sex assault, with associated trauma).
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply