Maybe the UK would have been better off without.

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Maybe the UK would have been better off without.

Post by rubato »

Striking difference in cancer rates.


Image

Obesity, heavy drinking and 'couch potato' lifestyle fuels 20% rise in cancer among the middle aged

Some 61,000 Britons aged 40 to 59 are diagnosed with cancer every year


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... z3J3C6MPtD
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Maybe the UK would have been better off without.

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Scotland conducts the annual prostate cancer examinations

Image
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Maybe the UK would have been better off without.

Post by rubato »

I don't want to know what the arrows are for.

Yrs,
Rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Maybe the UK would have been better off without.

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

The feathers tickled their fancy?

Doctors probed in vane?

They enjoyed being shafted?

Somebody said to fletch a doctor?

For pile to piles examination?

For use on the bow-legged?

For an unequivercal diagnosis?

Heads up - don't nock it!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply