I'm going to know the truth about 9/11 tonight...

[Joe Guy]

I've been given a copy of THE ANATOMY OF A GREAT DECEPTION to watch and will see it tonight. I plan to get in touch with my Inner Steve and understand the truth behind the government's plot to deceive the world.

Has anyone here seen it? I'll let you know all about it tomorrow.

Check this out...

[dgs49]

The unavoidable conclusion upon watching #7 go down is that it was done with explosives, in a controlled razing.

[BoSoxGal]

[MajGenl.Meade]

The unavoidable conclusion upon watching#7 go down is that it was done with explosives, in reading dgs49's post is an uncontrolled crazing.

FTFY

[Lord Jim]

Conspiracy theorists say World Trade Center 7 is the best proof for controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by airliners and only had a few fires. They also claim that there was a confession from the building owner who said he "pulled" it. But this is deceptive because while building 7 wasn't hit by an airliner, it was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7. Below is evidence showing that conspiracy theorists are wrong.

As you can see from the graphic below, all the buildings just as far away from both towers as WTC7 were hit. The others were either very short buildings which didn't have to support a massive load above or had no fire. Only Building 7 had unfought fires and the massive load of 40 stories above them.





As you can see, the building never caught fire so it was never in any danger of collapse. It also was constructed differently, with a web column design. The interior columns were not pushed out to the perimeter.

Note the WTC columns laid out as if there were a path to the building. There are no concrete slabs attached to columns. This is yet another example of pancaking. With the floors pancaking straight down, the perimeter walls were free to lean over in tall sections before breaking off and coming down. That's what gave them distance.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

There's a lot more well researched and detailed info about this at that link Dave...

Before you put on your tinfoil hat and make plans for a FtF in Chester Vermont, I strongly suggest you check it out....

[MajGenl.Meade]

..or check in

[Joe Guy]

Due to circumstances beyond my control, I was unable to watch the video last night. I might watch it tonight if I have control of my circumstances.

Nevertheless... hmmmm... I don't think I've ever written nevertheless before. Where was I? I wish I had a teleprompter....

[MajGenl.Meade]

[Joe Guy]

In case anyone wants to watch the complete video...

[MajGenl.Meade]

What a douche bag.

eta. sorry. plural. What douche bags

[oldr_n_wsr]

One cannot just place explosives and expect a building to come down.
Anyone ever watch what the experts go through to implode a building? Columns and supports are reduced to almost unsafe dimensions.
Floors are similarly degraded. The structural integrity of a building being readied for implosion is not habitable. WTC7 was occupied up until evacuation.

Nuts

[Lord Jim]

In case anyone wants to watch the complete video...

Yeah, I'll bet there'll be a lot of takers to spend an hour and a half of their time watching that....