Shooting things!
What science should be about
What science should be about
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
-
MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21185
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: What science should be about
This experiment started well. The characters and background were introduced well but the element of surprise was lacking. The director telegraphed the assassination long beforehand and then dwelt overlong in excruciating slow motion repeats, using only one point of view. The examination of theories involving multiple shot distances failed to convince the viewer of any involvement from the grassy knoll or indeed any other location. I did enjoy the postscript which explained that the ink droplet was not permanently damaged and went on to achieve success in the field of psychology as part of a Rorschach test. Overall: Thumbs down
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: What science should be about
Thank you Roger Ebert!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”