No accounting for taste

Food, recipes, fashion, sport, education, exercise, sexuality, travel.
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I've lived in the USA for over 30 years. In all that time, I've not heard the expression "nom nom nom" (or num num num) used to indicate keen appreciation of the taste of foodstuffs - not, that is, until the past 4 years.

All right-thinking people know that the correct expression is "yum yum yum". Even USians declare "why, that was yummy!"

No one says "that was nommy".

What is this sudden lingual insanity?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

I believe "nom nom nom" is supposed to be a written expression of the sound of a person's lips smacking as they eat quickly...
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

it the sound of joy made when eating food made by a master chef, as far as I can tell. that s the sound everyone made when they tasted my avatars cooking anyway, not on purpose tho

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15505
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Joe Guy »

You cook avatars?

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Gob »

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Meaning no offense

M: Um, er...excuse me, um, are you... are you suggesting eating my mother?

(pause)

U: Yeah. Not raw, cooked!

M: What?

U:Roasted with a few french fries, broccoli, horseradish sauce ...

M: Well, I do feel a bit peckish.

U: Great!

M: Can we have some parsnips?

U: (calling) Fred - get some parsnips.

M: I really don't think I should.

U: Look, tell you what, we'll eat her, if you feel a bit guilty about it afterwards, we can dig a grave and you can throw up in it.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

sorry joe. I forgot the space where my apostrophe was supposed to be....

that s funny meade. I stopped watching South Park when they fed the one kid his mom in a bowl of chili...

Big RR
Posts: 14943
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Big RR »

You have to love that last line. :lol:

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Lord Jim wrote:I believe "nom nom nom" is supposed to be a written expression of the sound of a person's lips smacking as they eat quickly...


Yes, yes, yes - but it's only in the past four years I ever heard it used (here actually). Normal people say yum, yum, yum.

And anyway, lip-smacking doesn't sound at all like "nom".

Nom was a destructive desert creature... Thomas Covenant
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11667
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Crackpot »

It's a Japanese idiom that has made it's way over here

See "fap"
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

Yes, yes, yes - but it's only in the past four years I ever heard it used (here actually). Normal people say yum, yum, yum.
Gen'l, I realize how unsettling it is for you when a new expression enters the popular lexicon, (you probably still haven't gotten over "groovy") but you're just going to have to learn how to chillax... 8-)
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by wesw »

if you had been watching sesame street you would have seen the cookie monster saying it when you arrived 30 yrs ago

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Great - a stupid puppet sets the standard. Why is no one (wesw kind of tried) addressing the issue? No one has ever heard of this until 2010.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

Why is no one (wesw kind of tried) addressing the issue?
Now, I'm just spit balling here...

But maybe because it ain't much of an issue? :nana
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Gob »

National Organization for Marriage. A group of people so afraid of same-sex marriage they fail to realize the irony of their acronym, their use of the phrase "Rainbow Coalition", or the acronym for their new project, which is "2M4M".
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Long Run »

Lord Jim wrote: Gen'l, I realize how unsettling it is for you when a new expression enters the popular lexicon, (you probably still haven't gotten over "groovy") but you're just going to have to learn how to chillax... 8-)
Yea man, it's how we roll.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Lord Jim »

I'll tell you the one that drives me meshuga...

(Or at least it used to, until I decided that being driven meshuga wasn't a good thing)

It's the whole "up talk" thing...

The ever more pervasive, insidious tendency to end declarative statements with an upward lilt in the voice that makes it sound like a question...

I think there's a clear generational line that can be drawn on this between those born after 1970, and those born before...

I believe this undermining of the English language can be traced to the 1980s "Valley Girl" popularity...

Those who became teenagers during that period (Like Lady Kelly) and since, seem to suffer from this...

It started out among females, but has now passed over to the male population as well...

It's gotten to the point where it's basically impossible to turn on a news channel featuring otherwise bright and articulate college educated 20 something, or 30 something, or even 40 something show hosts or pundits where this isn't going on as a matter of course...

And of course my own daughter does it too...(I've tried to break her of it by doing it myself in an overly exaggerated way, but while she finds that amusing, it's not having much impact....)

There comes a point where you just have to throw up your hands in surrender... :?
Last edited by Lord Jim on Tue Nov 25, 2014 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21516
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Oh don't get me started! My grand-daughter is a lovely, articulate 20-something and every other word is "like" and every damn sentence goes uUPP at the end as if all the world is one giant interrogatory. When she was at our house recently with two friends (and two of the respective mothers), I had to either go to the basement or kill myself. I'm still not sure which I chose.

But this f-ing nom, nom is driving me nuts (as the pirate with the wheel in his crotch said).
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 6723
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Long Run »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:
But this f-ing nom, nom is driving me nuts (as the pirate with the wheel in his crotch said).
I think it's totes awesome.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15505
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: No accounting for taste

Post by Joe Guy »


Post Reply