What news?

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

What news?

Post by Gob »

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

Around 2 years ago I stopped reading and watching mainstream news. I don’t read a single newspaper, offline or online, and I don’t watch any TV at all. I recently mentioned this on Twitter and Facebook and it created a lot of discussion, so I wanted to expand on my thoughts and experiences.

When I first started ignoring news, I felt that I was simply making an excuse, that if I had more time I should read the news. Today, however, it is a very deliberate choice and I feel consistently happier every single day due to ignoring the mainstream news. It just so happens that the last 2 years have also been the most enjoyable and productive of my entire life, and have contained some of my greatest achievements. Here are a few reasons I think we should stop consuming mainstream news:

News is negative

"The news media are, for the most part, the bringers of bad news and it’s not entirely the media’s fault, bad news gets higher ratings and sells more papers than good news." - Peter McWilliams

The most interesting fact I learned in the last few years about mainstream media is that is that almost all news reported is negative. Studies have shown that the ratio of bad news to good news is around 17:1. That means that 95% is negative. This is a massive number, and I’m sure if you stop to think for a moment about the most recent news you watched, it has also been overwhelmingly negative. In my experience, 95% is absolutely the correct ratio in the news. However, 95% is a very bad reflection of the real ratio of good to bad in the world. Many great things happen, they just don’t sell newspapers.

Mainstream news report about wars, natural disasters, murders and other kinds of suffering. It seems the only natural conclusion of watching or reading mainstream news is that the world is a terrible place, and that it is getting worse every day. However, the reality of course is the complete opposite: we live in an amazing time and the human race is improving at a faster pace than ever before.

The effect of negative news

"When you turn on the television, for instance, you run the risk ingesting harmful things, such as violence, despair, or fear." - Thich Nhat Hanh

Another very interesting thing I’ve learned in the last few years is the incredible impact that being around the right people can have on your trajectory to achieving what you want. This comes down essentially to your environment, and whilst it can mean some hard decisions to change our environment, we actually have a lot of control over it.

These two aspects - that we are subconsciously affected by our environment, no matter how much willpower we believe ourselves to have, and that we have much more control over our environment than we realise have been a key factor of some of the success I’ve had in the last few years.

In a TED talk titled "Information is food", JP Rangaswami compared eating McDonald’s for 31 days, as in Supersize Me, to watching Fox News for 31 days. In essence, mainstream news is the fast food of information. There are much healthier types of information we can and should consume.

The opportunity cost of watching news

The other key thing that I think it can be easy to overlook, is what you could be doing in the time you are spending watching the news.

I remember as a kid, my parents always used to watch the 6 o’clock news. It became so ingrained, it was what would always happen at exactly 6pm, and if we didn’t watch it, we would surely miss out on something vital that could affect our lives.

As a teenager, over time I managed to gradually escape that more and more often. At first, I simply turned to something I enjoyed. I played games online in the evenings instead of sitting with my family and watching the news. The most interesting thing, however, is that my passion for gaming turned into a powerful hobby of learning to code, and I accredit this for a lot of my startup success.

Not only is watching news going to put an out of proportion amount of negative thoughts in your mind, which will affect what you can achieve, it is also valuable time where there are many amazing and meaningful things you could be doing:

you could go to the gym and feel better every day
you could help someone and at the same time feel happier
you could build an MVP which could turn into a startup
you could write an article and start building a useful resource for others


Try a month off mainstream news

Abstaining from mainstream news has been one of the single best decisions I’ve made in the last two years for both my productivity and my happiness. If you’re still in a habit of watching or reading news, I strongly recommend you take Thomas Jefferson’s advice and try a month off news:

"I do not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month, and I feel myself infinitely the happier for it."

e
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21238
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Deja Vu

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12261

Plagiarism much? (or was it the same bloke figuring that no one reads the Grauniad and he could recycle?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: What news?

Post by Guinevere »

I would say - skip the TV "news" and the "all news" cable stations. But there is still actual journalism going on at newspapers. Although being the day after the Oscars, even that is doubtful today . . .

BTW - Dr. Andrew Weil used to advocate for a reduction in news (esp TV news) in either Spontaneous Healing or 8 Weeks to Optimum Health.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19714
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: What news?

Post by BoSoxGal »

I took a total hiatus from news on my last real vacation, and since coming back (a year and a half now) I limit my intake to a few days a week of NPR - which is why I often do poorly on our weekly quizzes. The more fantastic stories I know about are ones Gob posts here, or which I learn about from friends' Facebook posts. I'm going to work harder on limiting my intake.

I do, however, appreciate investigative journalism - for that I read a few reputable magazines.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: What news?

Post by wesw »

I used to read at least two papers a day, religiously. for the last three years or so I have rarely picked one up. I also used to watch mc neil -Lehrer news hour almost every night since I was in high school. same thing now with the news hour , I rarely watch it.

the quality and accuracy of the reporting deteriorated to the point of making it not worth the effort or expense. I even continued to read the Washington post during their little snit where they stopped covering the orioles. the Baltimore sun was just too poor of a paper to tolerate. when the Washington times became a better paper than the post I gave them all up. the Economist was a good substitute for a while, but I don t even get that anymore.

I truly believe that in addition to becoming a poor product, today s media kow-tows to the govt in many ways and avoids telling us the truth in many cases so that our "national security" will not be risked by telling us the truth and us panicking or doing something really crazy like making an informed decision when we vote

Post Reply