The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Food, recipes, fashion, sport, education, exercise, sexuality, travel.
User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

Ted Wells fires back at critics of his report on Deflategate

Ted Wells, chief investigator of the Patriots’ scandal over improperly inflated footballs, delivered a blistering response Tuesday to attacks by team owner Robert Kraft and by Tom Brady’s agent on his independence and integrity, while portraying the team as overly suspicious and its star quarterback as, at times, uncooperative.

Kraft and Brady’s agent, Don Yee, outraged by the NFL’s stiff penalties against Brady and the team for their alleged transgressions, have suggested that Wells shaped his report to satisfy unspecified NFL figures who bear ill will toward the Patriots and Brady. Wells derided such a premise as preposterous.

“All this discussion that people in the league office wanted to put some type of hit on the most popular, iconic player in the league — the real face of the league — just doesn’t make any sense,’’ Wells said in a conference call with the media. “It’s really a ridiculous allegation.’’

He said, “It is wrong to criticize my independence just because you disagree with my findings.’’

Wells pulled back part of the curtain on his multimillion-dollar investigation, portraying the Patriots as distrustful, if not paranoid, not only of his inquiry but of an initial investigation by the NFL’s security team. He challenged Yee to offer any information to back the agent’s accusations that the report withheld evidence favorable to Brady.[yeah, let's all hold our breath waiting for that to happen...]And Wells provided considerably more detail about a range of issues, from his thwarted efforts to fully investigate Brady and the self-described “deflator,’’ Jim McNally, to his certainty about Brady’s culpability.

Brady, meanwhile, has begun pursuing the appeal of his four-game suspension with a legal team headed by Jeffrey Kessler, a lawyer for the players union who has vast experience in sports-related litigation. In addition to the suspension, the National Football League fined the Patriots $1 million and took away two draft picks.

For the investigator, there remains little doubt on Brady’s guilt. Wells said that if he had served on a jury and a judge had instructed him to determine Brady’s fate based on a preponderance of the evidence — as NFL rules bound him to do — then, “I would have checked the box that said, ‘Proven.’ ”

He said Brady might have helped himself had he complied with requests to turn over any relevant texts or e-mails. Instead, Wells said, Brady and Yee rejected even his highly unusual offer to let them decide what to hand over.

“I was willing not to take possession of the phone,’’ Wells said. “I said, ‘I don’t want to see any private information. You keep the phone . . . and give me documents that are responsive to this investigation, and I will take your word that you have given me what’s responsive.’ And they still refused.’’


Yee has maintained there was “no fairness in the Wells investigation whatsoever’’ and attributed the findings to “games played on Park Avenue,’’ the site of NFL headquarters in New York.

Wells called on Yee to prove his assertion that the Deflategate report unfairly characterized Brady by omitting material. Yee has said he kept detailed notes of Brady’s five-hour interview with Wells.

“There is nothing, I guarantee you, in those notes that would have made any difference in my decision,’’ Wells said. “He should publish those notes and stop acting like there is some secret in them.’’
[another good opportunity to hold our breath...]

As for Kraft’s distrust of NFL investigators, Wells said, “The Patriots urged me when I got in the case to start fresh, not to pay any attention to what NFL security had done. In fact, they thought the people at the NFL were biased.’’

The Patriots and Yee now say the same about Wells, a prominent white-collar defense lawyer and sports investigator who previously produced reports on scandals involving Miami Dolphins lineman Richie Incognito, Syracuse assistant basketball coach Bernie Fine, and NBA players union chief Billy Hunter.

Wells said he never before has spoken publicly after his sports investigations but made an exception because of the attacks by Kraft and Yee.

“When I was appointed to be the independent investigator, no one with the Patriots or in Mr. Brady’s camp raised any issue about my independence or my integrity,’’ he said. “In fact, Mr. Kraft, to my recollection, said he welcomed my appointment.’’

On Monday, Kraft responded to the NFL’s punishment of Brady and the Patriots by accusing Wells of conducting a “one-sided investigation.’’ Neither the owner, nor Yee, reacted to Wells comments Tuesday.

When a Boston-based reporter during the conference call suggested Wells had improperly done “the NFL’s bidding’’ by veering off topic and stating in his report that Brady and the Patriots were not victims of a sting operation, the investigator said he addressed the issue only because the Patriots asked him to do so.

The team’s suspicions stemmed from a complaint from the Indianapolis Colts to the NFL before the AFC Championship game on Jan. 18 that the Patriots might be deflating footballs below the league’s minimum standard.

The Patriots were not informed of the complaint, and the investigation was launched after the Colts intercepted a Brady pass in the first half of the game and alerted officials the ball was under-inflated.

“The Patriots were all over me from day one about why the NFL did not tell them about the complaint and alleging there was a sting operation,’’ Wells said. “I investigated the issue and I did not find there was a sting. What the facts showed was the opposite.’’

He said his investigation determined that “no one at the league office took the [Colts] complaint seriously.’’ He said the complaint was forwarded by e-mail to the football operations staff, who relayed it to the game officials.

“You get these kinds of complaints all the time,’’ Wells said. “Nobody paid much attention to it. There was no sting operation.’’

Wells also rejected suggestions that his inquiry neglected to take into consideration how possible biases against the Patriots held by league officials could have influenced the inquiry. To the contrary, Wells said, the Patriots pushed him to address those very issues. Wells said he kept “a sharp eye’’ on the matter and “did not find that there was any kind of bias.’’

The best evidence against Brady and the Patriots, Wells said, was an exchange of texts between McNally and the team’s assistant equipment manager John Jastremski, three months before the AFC Championship game.

McNally, apparently unhappy with Brady, allegedly texted to Jastremski: “Tom sucks . . . im going make that next ball a [expletive] balloon.’’

Jastremski replied, “Talked to him last night. He actually brought you up and said you must have a lot of stress trying to get them done.’’

Wells said the exchange has been inaccurately described as circumstantial evidence rather than direct evidence involving “two participants in the scheme.’’

“I believe in the bottom of my heart that it refers to the fact that there must be stress in getting the balls done’’ for Brady, Wells said.

Wells said he discovered the texts only after his sole interview with McNally. He said he planned to confront McNally, whom he called the most important witness, about them in a subsequent interview, but the Patriots refused.

“Not only [did the Patriots] say I couldn’t interview him, they said they would not even tell him about my request for an interview,’’ Wells said.
[yet another example of obstructing the investigation.]

Kraft has justified the refusal by saying McNally already had been interviewed four times. In fact, Wells said, it was NFL investigators who interviewed McNally the first three times, for 40 minutes the night of the AFC title game, for 20 minutes by phone the next day, and for 30 minutes in person the following day, before Wells had his first and only opportunity to speak with him.

Wells, a Holy Cross graduate with degrees from the Harvard schools of business and law, acknowledged his investigation, commissioned by the NFL, cost millions of dollars. When he was asked to be more specific, he paused, but before he could elaborate, a league spokesman cut in, saying, “Not necessary.’’

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/ ... story.html
Here's a link to the full text of the phone conference:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/ ... ticle_More
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

(possibly to the courts, but then Brady's phone records could be subpoenaed, so maybe not),
I think court is the last place these folks would want to go...

Not only could records be subpoenaed, but people would have to testify under oath, with the possibility of perjury charges...

Putting McNally and Jastremski (who have already been suspended indefinitely and don't have much more to lose in terms of what the team can do to them) in that position should be the very last thing Kraft or Brady would want. ( In fact the longer they insist on dragging this out, rather than just shutting up and taking their punishment, the more they run the risk that these guys will finally flip.)
(and while Brady might be able to fake it, I don't think I could every see Bellichick being conciliatory).
Belichick is the one party who has been noteworthy for his silence since this report came out. (Perhaps that's because it specifically cleared him of involvement.)

If Kraft and Brady, (through his agent; Brady himself hasn't said anything, which means he still has the option to do the smart thing and take some responsibility and show some contrition) had any sense, they would follow his wise example.

ETA:
Brady will get a game of two knocked off the suspension, and the Patriots will get a reduced fine but still lose the draft picks
I thought originally they would probably get the penalties maybe cut in half on appeal, but I'm no longer so sure of that...

Their behavior (most Specifically Kraft and Yee; especially Yee) since the report came out and even more so since the penalties were announced has been so over the top belligerent, unprofessional and downright atrocious, (especially the unsubstantiated smearing of Wells) that I think they may have put Goodell into a position where he really can't appear to be giving into to this kind of flagrant bullying.

If he yields to these sorts of tactics, then he's going to be sending a signal to other teams and players that this is the way to behave if they get caught in a fix like this. I doubt that's something he wants to do.

ETA II:


In thinking further about whether or not they'll take this to court, I should add this caveat...

My conclusion that they won't is based on the premise that the Patriots organization and Brady (through Yee) will behave as rationally self-interested actors in this matter...

There is however substantial evidence since the very beginning of this, (and especially since the report came out) that this may not be the perspective that they operate from...

They certainly haven't behaved in a way that rationally serves their self-interest up to now, so why should one think they would suddenly reverse course and do so?

Hubris and delusion seem to be the order of the day, so they may very well be arrogant and delusional enough to think that going to court would be a good play for them...
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by wesw »

brady gets 4 games rest early. the back up gets some work in case he is needed later, brady goes to the play offs fresh and healthy.

pats win superbowl, brady gets one for the thumb and retires laughing, as a first ballot hall of famer and the best QB since Staubach.....

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

A pretty good analysis:
Tom Brady, Patriots can blame only themselves for NFL’s harsh DeflateGate punishments

The four-game suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, handed down by the NFL on Monday, and the Patriots’ $1 million fine and loss of draft picks are the end results of Brady and his team defending themselves when they should have explained themselves.

The Patriots’ response turned an obscure accusation — using illegally and deliberately under-inflated footballs — from minor rule-bending into full-blown spectacle. They upbraided detractors, evaded questions and defied the league. They could have avoided the entire mess if Brady had only admitted what he did.

The suspension, which is justified, is not about how much of an illicit advantage the Patriots gained (probably not much), the behavior of the NFL (suspect at best) or the flaws within Ted Wells’s report (numerous). Poking those holes dances around the crucial issue: Brady flouted a rule, and then lied about it to the public and to investigators. The latter matters as much as the former.


It was an error of strategy as much as a failure of morals that got Brady benched for the nationally televised season opener plus another three games. The controversy mushroomed as the Patriots made misstep after misstep. [which they have continued to do at an even greater pace since the report came out.] Whenever they could have scuttled the story, the Patriots intensified it.

Humility would have quelled the controversy, but the Patriots’ arrogance sparked it. Coach Bill Belichick authored a 40-minute news conference about barometric pressure. Owner Robert Kraft shrieked upon arrival at the Super Bowl and demanded an apology from the commissioner. Brady insisted to a room full of reporters he was certain he had done nothing wrong.

All along, the Patriots waged a stonewall defense best suited for a court of law when they needed a charm offensive to sway the league and public opinion. Imagine Brady had stepped to the podium on the Wednesday after the AFC title game and said the following: “It’s true; we took a small amount of air out of the footballs once the officials checked the balls. I did not believe it violated the spirit of the rule or the integrity of the competition, but I was wrong and I apologize to the Colts, the NFL and the fans. I do not believe our actions impacted the outcome of our victory against the Colts, but I played outside the rules and I am willing to accept punishment.”

The NFL rulebook calls for a $25,000 fine for tampering with the footballs. Brady could have cut the check a week before the Super Bowl and put DeflateGate behind him.


Instead, the Patriots ensured the NFL would pursue them and gave the league ammunition. The NFL deserves scorn for stoking the story with leaks the week before the Super Bowl. But the Patriots invited the story to linger and grow with their indignant denials.

The narrative the Patriots presented, including Brady’s uncooperative approach to Wells’s team, may have left enough reasonable doubt for a jury to let them walk. But the NFL never needed to prove he cheated beyond a reasonable doubt. The phrase “more probable than not” has been mocked by Patriots supporters, but the Wells probe reportedly used it for a reason: That is the threshold required for punishment.

The NFL was never going to let Brady off lightly once he lied to the investigators hired by the NFL. The Wells report specifically called out Brady for saying he didn’t know locker room attendant Jim McNally existed, even when “we found these claims not plausible and contradicted by other evidence,” the report said. “In fact, during his interview, [John] Jastremski” – a Patriots equipment manager who worked with McNally – “acknowledged that Brady knew McNally and McNally’s role.”

And there is a precedent for how the NFL punishes players who lie during league-commissioned investigations. New Orleans Saints defensive end Anthony Hargrove lied to investigators about the existence of the Saints’ bounty program. The league handed him an eight-game suspension, which was later reduced to two games.

Commissioner Roger Goodell’s brand of justice verges into bizarre paternalism, and it has eroded his credibility into a thin paste. But he has also shown no sign of changing, so Brady should have known the effect lying would have on his punishment. It could have saved him had the threshold of proof been higher. With the NFL’s threshold, it was a foolish mistake.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spor ... nishments/
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15501
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Joe Guy »

Brady probably got away with playing with his soft balls for so long that he thought he was entitled to them. Cheaters eventually get caught.

Idea for marketing: Nike should produce an Air Brady athletic shoe. It could come with a fully inflated cushion that can be deflated for comfort and would give a competitive advantage over people with non-deflatable shoes.

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Guinevere »

Yes, yes, in LJ's surreal world, defending yourself is whining.

Kraft said about 4 sentences. Yee a couple of paragraphs. Wells spent close to an hour whining to reporters and talking about "evidence" he claims he reviewed, but it never made it into the report (a report full of weasel words). Funny that.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by rubato »

What were the measured inflation pressures of each ball when they were measured after the game?

Is it more reasonable that those numbers were produced by a stochastic process or by deliberate manipulation?



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20206
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

The NFL Players Association's appeal of Tom Brady's four-game suspension has officially been filed, the union announced Thursday.

The quarterback's agent, Don Yee, said after the suspension was announced that the appeal would be filed, citing lack of evidence in the 243-page report from independent investigator Ted Wells. The report concluded it was "more probable than not" that Brady was "at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities" regarding the deflation of Patriots game balls used in the AFC Championship Game.

"Given the NFL's history of inconsistency and arbitrary decisions in disciplinary matters, it is only fair that a neutral arbitrator hear this appeal," the NFLPA said in a statement.

"If Ted Wells and the NFL believe, as their public comments stated, that the evidence in their report is 'direct' and 'inculpatory,' then they should be confident enough to present their case before someone who is truly independent."
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... suspension

I think I have the ideal "independent", "neutral" arbiter for Goodell to appoint to decide this...

A man with absolutely no dog in the fight...

A man who not only has no prejudices in the matter, but who couldn't conceivably care less...

A man who has absolutely no opinion about it...in fact he's so unbiased, not only doesn't he know or care about the issues involved, he's never heard of any of the people involved; hell he's never even watched a football game....

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the perfect arbitrator to decide this:



Image

:ok :D
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by wesw »

mao is dead, jim

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Gob »

I'm not wes.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15501
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Joe Guy »

That guy does have quite an arbitrary look to him...

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by wesw »

is that you, gob?

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11667
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Crackpot »

I know it's hard to tell when the picture isn't taken on the toilet
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21515
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Ah! Mao see dung!
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

wesw wrote:is that you, gob?
Yes wes...

That was kinda the point of the joke...

I wasn't talking about Mao... :?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Guinevere »

Goodell won't let the appeal go to a neutral, but is handling it himself. What are you afraid of Roger, letting this get out of your control? Speaks volumes....
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

It doesn't matter one bit who Goodell appointed...A neutral third party conducted the investigation, and you see what they did to him...

If Pope Francis heard the appeal Kraft and Yee would smear him unless he proclaimed Brady absolutely positively 100% innocent of any wrong doing, (just like they did to Wells)

These folks aren't interested in the "fairness" of the process; all they care about is the result...They made that quite clear with their reaction to the report...

I doubt that Goodell could have found many people of stature who would care to hear the appeal only to have their reputation trashed and their integrity impugned by the Patriots smear operation if they didn't exonerate Brady...

In fact that may have been the strategy behind the vicious trashing of Wells after the report came out...To convey the message, "See what happens to people who cross us?" in order to intimidate anyone hearing the appeal into ruling their way, regardless of the evidence....

Goodell himself doesn't have to worry about that; they've already done everything they can to trash him...

ETA:

Something I find hilarious is the way Yee and the Patriots have waxed indignant and expressed their puffed up outrage over the financial cost to the league of Wells' investigation...that really takes some high octane chutzpah...

It's kind of like if John Gotti had complained about all the taxpayer money that was spent to build a case against him...

But frankly I don't blame them for being upset; they wanted a half-assed pretend investigation that would declare the whole thing an unsolvable mystery and give them a pass...(I would too if I were in their situation)

Imagine their surprise when they discovered that an actual, real, honest, complete and thorough investigation was being conducted...The last thing they wanted...which is why they did everything they could to try to thwart it and having failed at thwarting it, have done everything they can to try to discredit it...

But in all fairness, they do have a point about the cost to the League; it really is unfair...

So I propose that the entire cost of the Wells investigation be added on to the fine levied against the Patriots, since if it hadn't been for their dishonesty and obstructionism, none of it would have needed to be spent.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Guinevere »

That is one of the largest loads of bull hockey you have ever posted, LJ. And again with your notion that asserting a defense is somehow wrong or bad. Perhaps you might want to brush up on your understanding of due process......

First of all, there has been plenty of credible discussion and analysis about how and why the Wells report was *not* neutral.

Second, the Patriots absolutely wanted a fair and thorough investigation. That the scope of the investigation was broadened was at the insistence of the Pats. The letters to the NFL asking for same is in the record.

Third, the Patriots provided unprecedented access to their employees and their records and documents during the course of the investigation.

Fourth, Kraft is on the record as saying he would accept and not challenge any discipline the league imposed on the team. But that was before the supposedly fair and impartial investigation became a witch hunt, and the penalties imposed had nothing to do with the actual issue at hand.

Fifth, evidence of lack of impartiality in the penalty is the lack of proportionality between the alleged rule violation, the penalties assessed, and other high-profile disciplinary actions. Ray Rice - 2 game suspension for beating his wife, on video. The Falcons - $250,000 for piping in crowd music to make the stadium louder and impact the outcome of the game. The Patriots - $1MM fine, 4 day suspension for Brady.

Finally, the report really shows how boneheaded the referees and the NFL were/are with respect to handling the balls before and during the game, handling "evidence," and the disparate treatment of the Colts (3 of their 4 balls also measured low at half-time but the fact that environmental conditions cause the deflation were not questions) and the Patriots at the AFC Championship.

Goodell wants "parity" in the league because ultimately, it will generate more revenue for the League, and help him get even a higher contract next time around (can we say the $100MM man?). His financial bias is only one strike against him. He has handled this (and other investigations) poorly, with his own credibility at question time and time again. If he truly wanted a fair, unbiased, and accurate outcome, he would have hired an investigator that didn't have such close personal ties with Goodell and with the NFL, and he would have no problem letting a neutral arbitrator hear Brady's appeal (also something he has done many times before). Goodell knows there is a significant chance of the discipline being overturned or reduced if an outsider looks closely at the investigation and all of the evidence amassed (not just the evidence that favors the NFL's view of the events).

A good lawyer will look at, analyze, and discuss both the evidence in favor of the client's position, and the evidence against that position. One of the greatest services I provide to my clients is the ability to look at both sides of the issue, weigh the evidence, and give anyclient an impartial assessment of outcomes. The worst thing a lawyer can go is get caught up in the client's view of the world, and it does happen -- fairly often. I've usually ended up beating the pants off of those lawyers, though.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: The Verdict Is In On Deflategate...

Post by Lord Jim »

Kraft is on the record as saying he would accept and not challenge any discipline the league imposed on the team. But that was before the supposedly fair blah blah blah
I don't believe Kraft has yet announced a decision on whether or not to appeal the team's punishment; I read this morning that he has until the 21st to make that call...

The more I think about it, the more I think Goodell made the right decision to hear the appeal himself; essentially he's calling Brady's (and potentially Kraft's) bluff...

Obviously he's not going to overturn the punishment, but I suppose he might reduce it (If he does he's a better man than I; as I said if it were up to me, after the smear job done on Wells I'd increase the penalties. I certainly don't think any reduction is justified. The only thing that would justify reducing the penalty would be some responsibility taking and contrition; basically the opposite of the sort of behavior that has been exhibited.)

If Brady still isn't happy after Goodell makes his decision, then he can decide on filing suit in court...

Then it will be time for him to put up or shut up; if he's truly as innocent as he claims, then he should welcome the opportunity to demonstrate that in a forum where his phone and email records will be subpoenaed, and everyone involved (including McNally and Jastremski) will testify under oath...

I think by deciding to hear the appeal himself, Goodell is essentially daring him (and Kraft if he so chooses) to do that.

Then they can have a really neutral and impartial decision....
ImageImageImage

Post Reply