How Millibean and Labour lost the election

[Gob]

Jim, you may enjoy this..

On 23 September 2014, Ed Miliband prepared to take the stage at the Labour party conference in Manchester to deliver the most important speech of his career.

But instead of rehearsing the speech he had memorised, he was being forced to concentrate on a new opening section, endorsing the proposal David Cameron had made that morning to join the US bombing of Isis in Iraq.

“Stupidly, none of us had thought the late changes could have an impact on the quality of what he would deliver in the rest of the speech,” one of the advisers most involved in its writing recalled. “My sense is that looking back, it knocked him off course slightly. He started with the Isis passage, and it went over relatively poorly in the hall. He was off his game.”

“What’s worse,” the adviser continued, “for the whole of the speech, he was improvising more than you might imagine. Ideas dropped from earlier drafts – such as a joke about being mistaken for Benedict Cumberbatch – suddenly reappeared. He was not quite sure in his head where he was, so when he got to the bit where the deficit should have been, he just started a different section. I remember immediately thinking ‘shit’, but I thought perhaps he had shuffled it around because I had seen him do that before.”

In fact, Miliband had simply forgotten the brief passage about the deficit – the one addressing the issue that had hung over parliament like an ominous cloud for the previous four years. It was only a hundred words – including a promise to “eliminate the deficit as soon as possible” – but Miliband only realised the error, to his horror, as he walked off the stage.

article continues here...

[oldr_n_wsr]

Teleprompters are your friends.

[Lord Jim]

Teleprompters are your friends.

That occurred to me as well...

Very interesting article...

I haven't posted a full response about it yet, because I'm still making my way through it...

Overall so far, it looks like it was a classic "too many cooks" situation, (similar to Gore in 2000) resulting in a mushy and ineffective message...(and also like the Gore campaign, the problem was compounded by a mushy and ineffective messenger...)

I also thought David Axelrod made a good point:

On 15 May, a week before the vote, Miliband met with David Axelrod – Barack Obama’s chief campaign adviser, who had signed on as a consultant to the Labour campaign for an astronomical fee – at Corrigan’s, an upscale Mayfair restaurant. During the meal, Beales was fielding calls from Miliband, who was still asking him to think of a slogan for the remaining week of the European election campaign; Axelrod was appalled by the low quality of the ideas being discussed, which he derisively characterised as “Vote Labour and win a microwave”. Unless Miliband could present the public with a bigger and more inspiring message, Axelrod told him, it would be impossible to regain the support of the white working-class voters who were deserting the Labour party.

He was talking about the European parliament election, but that same problem played a huge role in the national election results...

[Gob]

Agreed. Also, if you're going to play "personality politics", make sure your candidate has a personality.

[MajGenl.Meade]

Also, he looks like a Paki
yrs
N Farage (former)