Murder in Santa Cruz

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by TPFKA@W »

bigskygal wrote:Actually, americuntwoman, the article I quoted is from a respected scholarly article and there are dozens more out there - many of which I've read because I like to remain educated on the newest developments in psychological treatments of various conditions that my clients may manifest.

Not surprised at all that your cuntness doesn't bother staying educated on newest developments in any medical field, which is doubtless why you pose a danger to your patients, the poor souls. Instead you'd rather put your energies toward denigrating people who are smarter than you, more successful than you, and making a more compassionate contribution to society. (Please, don't bother defending yourself on that point - nurse or not, nobody who behaves the way you do here toward me is remotely compassionate at heart. You're a mean-spirited cunt.)

And yes, CUNT, scholarly articles are included in Google's massive database.


Yeah but since you are a nut job it I expect this sort of reaction.
Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others. But behind this mask of ultraconfidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

A narcissistic personality disorder causes problems in many areas of life, such as relationships, work, school or financial affairs. You may be generally unhappy and disappointed when you're not given the special favors or admiration you believe you deserve. Others may not enjoy being around you, and you may find your relationships unfulfilling.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Lord Jim »

Okay, pop quiz...

BSG's response to Meade's post will be:

A. Something like, "You're right General, I didn't need to use that language; I apologize"

B. A chiding of him for criticizing her but not @W....

If you answered "A" the line for drug testing forms on the right....

8-)

ETA:

BTW BSG, it would have been helpful if you had posted a link to the excerpt you quoted, so people could see for themselves both the source and the context. It appears to me that this particular bruhaha might have been avoided if you had done that.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by TPFKA@W »

Remember her "humble" return after her hiatus? :lol:

With her particular dx humble doesn't last and no admissions of being wrong can be made. Her over inflated head would burst open.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15482
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Joe Guy »

ImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Lord Jim »

no admissions of being wrong can be made.

Well, now that's not entirely fair...

I recall several months ago when she was completely wrong, (and I was completely right) about the cause of the commercial plane crash in The Alps, she apologized for being an optimistic and hopeful person who was hoping for the least bad explanation....

My mother used to make a lot of "apologies" like that...("I apologize for being such a good hearted and trusting person that I get disappointed and taken advantage of"...."I'm sorry I had more respect for so and so then they deserved..."...etc.)
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

...and for the record I would have chastised @w for coarse language had I noticed it at the time. I'm sure that would have elicited a kindly response.................
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by TPFKA@W »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:...and for the record I would have chastised @w for coarse language had I noticed it at the time. I'm sure that would have elicited a kindly response.................
Yes, when actually what you need to do is mind your own business.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

See? A kindly response!

Image
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Lord Jim »

No good can possibly come from involving yourself in these disputes Gen'l...

Never has, never will...

You're a bright fella; after all these many failed attempts, (well meaning I'm sure) why hasn't this obvious fact dawned on you?

It is quite perplexing... :?
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Oh well LJ, I just can't abide stupid swearing - it's vacuous, childish, demeaning to the person who engages in it, sophomoric, and symptomatic of paucity of imagination. I don't understand the necessity or that poverty of mind that requires it
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15482
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Joe Guy »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:Oh well LJ, I just can't abide stupid swearing - it's vacuous, childish, demeaning to the person who engages in it, sophomoric, and symptomatic of paucity of imagination. I don't understand the necessity or that poverty of mind that requires it
I cunt understand twat they're upset about...

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Lord Jim »

Oh well LJ, I just can't abide stupid swearing - it's vacuous, childish, demeaning to the person who engages in it, sophomoric, and symptomatic of paucity of imagination.
Okay, so for you it's not about the pissing match per se...

It's all about who's using nasty cuss words...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by Gob »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:Oh well LJ, I just can't abide stupid swearing - it's vacuous, childish, demeaning to the person who engages in it, sophomoric, and symptomatic of paucity of imagination. I don't understand the necessity or that poverty of mind that requires it
Utter bollocks I'm afraid. Swearing is just the use of "taboo" words for effect and impact. There is nothing "vacuous, childish, demeaning" about it, no more than there is in your "grammar nazism". To claim it's use is "symptomatic of paucity of imagination", is just intellectual wank and snobbery, if Leonard Cohen tells someone to "fuck off" does that mean he lacks imagination? Or does it mean the words he's chosen reflect his thoughts and emotional state?
Giving me head on the unmade bed,
While the limousines wait in the street.

“F. once said: At sixteen I stopped fucking faces. I had occasioned the remark by expressing disgust at his latest conquest, a young hunchback he had met while touring an orphanage. F. spoke to me that day as if I were truly one of the underprivileged; or perhaps he was not speaking to me at all when he muttered: Who am I to refuse the universe?”
― Leonard Cohen, Beautiful Losers
“How quickly pettiness returns, and that most ignoble form of real estate, the possessive occupation and tyranny over two square inches of human flesh, the wife's cunt.”
― Leonard Cohen, Beautiful Losers
Do you know how to see the akropolis like the Indians did who never even had one? Fuck a saint, that's how, find a little saint and fuck her over and over in some pleasant part of heaven, get right into her plastic altar, dwell in her silver medal, fuck her until she tinkles like a souvenir music box, until the memorial lights go on for free, find a little saintly faker like Teresa or Catherine Tekakwitha or Lesbia, whom prick never knew but who lay around all day in a chocolate poem, find one of these quaint impossible cunts and fuck her for your life, coming all over the sky, fuck her on the moon with a steel hourglass up your hole, get tangled in her airy robes, suck her nothing juices, lap, lap, lap, a dog in the ether, then climb down to this fat earth and slouch around the fat earth in your stone shoes, get clobbered by a runaway target, take the senseless blows again and again, a right to the mind, piledriver on the heart, kick in the scrotum, help! help! it's my time, my second, my splinter of the shit glory tree, police, fire men! look at the traffic of happiness and crime, it's burning in crayon like the akropolis rose! And so on.”
― Leonard Cohen, Beautiful Losers
Ooh, naughty Leonard!

Why are you religious bods so intent on controlling others? ;)
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by TPFKA@W »

In a couple of ways he is much like head girl. He absolutely has to control, he is a major control freak, but he also has to show everyone that he is superior, in knowledge and in moral authority, to everyone else on the board. It is just so Christian. I am sure God has a special fenced off area in heaven so Meade can exist there without knowing anyone else made it.

He and head girl make a cute couple.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Well, that's an interesting discussion. First, to dismiss the most pathetic response, I obviously do not "control" anyone, least of all anyone on this board. Even to seek to do so would be an act of doubtful sanity. I simply ask others to control themselves and suggest that the "c" word in particular is a woman-hating, sexist word used by pieces of garbage. Am I superior to woman-hating, sexist pieces of garbage? Perhaps in that particular area but probably not in others. It's typical of boors to defend their boorishness.

Secundus, the use of bad language in literature. Presumably it reflects the way that characters speak and is not used as a cheap insult by those in fits of illiterate fury. Once the posts on this board are recognized as literature and published as such, I might reconsider.

As "emphasis", it is entirely unnecessary in written communication since it emphasizes nothing as much as the writer deliberately choosing to use a "naughty" word purely for effect - ooooh, aren't I the clever one! - rather than the many available words indicating emphasis without scraping the potty. For example, "no f***ing cricket" actually emphasizes nothing whatsoever, except in the mouth of someone who hates cricket and wishes to denigrate it. They'd still be moronic but at least show an inkling of the use of modifiers and emphasis.

And yes, LJ. The contest will continue because two people want to be nasty to each other. More power to 'em. But it would be nice if they could moderate the foul language and express their jolly jibes with more finesse, if not actual wit.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by TPFKA@W »

No, you don't control, but you want to with a passion. You attempt control by attempting to shame others into doing you bidding. Moralizing, pontificating and judging all the way.

It would be simpler to stay out of the fray but then where would you get your jollies?

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by rubato »

TPFKA@W wrote:
rubato wrote:The perp had a very difficult family life. You can look it up, if you care. A world that does not treat children that badly will have fewer of these.


Yrs,
Rubato
Not everyone who is treated badly is a psychopath in the end. Not every psychopath was treated poorly in the beginning of their life. Not every psychopath is murderous. Psychopaths are not curable and in fact it is not clear what makes them what they are in the first place.
... " .

Perhaps you should read what was written. I know its difficult when you've got your hate cranked up to 11. "less cruelty will produce fewer of these" It is long since proven that cruelty experienced in childhood is often the cause of cruelty later in life.


And the term in use for more than 20 years is "anti-social personality disorder" not "psychopath". And only a small fraction of those become murderers. You should ask why that is.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

TPFKA@W wrote:No, you don't control, but you want to with a passion. You attempt control by attempting to shame others into doing you bidding. Moralizing, pontificating and judging all the way.

It would be simpler to stay out of the fray but then where would you get your jollies?
...from reading increasingly meaningless and desperate responses from serial abusers.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by rubato »

She imagines that the voices over the internet are trying to control her? Why would anyone want to ?



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Murder in Santa Cruz

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

No, you don't control, but you want to with a passion. You attempt control by attempting to shame others into doing you bidding. Moralizing, pontificating and judging all the way.

It would be simpler to stay out of the fray but then where would you get your jollies?
Or to put it another way, who here is doing the most to "control" what others say or don't say? Who's doing the pontificating and judging? Who wants to tell someone else whether or not they can post at all?

Those who feel shame probably deserve to do so.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply