First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

(Reuters) - A man arrested for climbing a White House fence earlier this year was shot and killed at a suburban Pennsylvania courthouse on Tuesday after he sliced a sheriff's deputy with a knife, the local district attorney said.

Curtis Smith, 34, is accused of entering the lobby of the Chester County Justice Center at about 11 a.m. and slashing a sheriff's deputy on the arm or hand, Chester County District Attorney Thomas Hogan said in a statement.

A second deputy in the lobby drew his weapon and shot Smith, who was treated at the scene but later died at Paoli Hospital, Hogan said.

"The armed attacker was immediately neutralized by the sheriff's deputies," Hogan said in a statement.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

was immediately neutralized
Saves the trouble to the legal system. :clap:

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

There's a Marley song in this.

I guess it must have been a Capital fence
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Big RR »

oldr_n_wsr wrote:
was immediately neutralized
Saves the trouble to the legal system. :clap:

Certainly you aren't saying he deserved the death penalty for slashing the deputy's arm or hand, are you?

He was a danger and the officer likely responded appropriately, but it would not have been a capital case.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

I slashed the deputy
It was a Capital 'fence
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Big RR »

:ok

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by rubato »

Big RR wrote:
oldr_n_wsr wrote:
was immediately neutralized
Saves the trouble to the legal system. :clap:

Certainly you aren't saying he deserved the death penalty for slashing the deputy's arm or hand, are you?

He was a danger and the officer likely responded appropriately, but it would not have been a capital case.

Surely, he did say that. And just as surely you admitted that he was right. In the rush of time, in the crushing flow of events in the real world we have to make decisions apart from legal sophistry and bullshit.


yrs,
rubato

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Big RR »

Perhaps. but killing in self defense or in the defense of others is not the same as executing a man who is no longer a threat (or at least very little threat) to anyone (at least so long as he remains incarcerated). I doubt anyone needs any legal training to understand that.

oldr said "saves the trouble to the legal system", and I certainly did not admit he was right. I did admit that it was likely that the officer responded appropriately under the circumstances, but that is quite different.

So please, refrain from putting words in my mouth, and try to read posts in their entirety. We could do with a lot less bullshit.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Certainly you aren't saying he deserved the death penalty for slashing the deputy's arm or hand, are you?
I doubt very much that the slayer aimed for the arm/hand thinking to himself that he would avoid life imprison or the death penalty that he would have gotten by going for the neck/vein/artery.
He got what he deserved for what he tried to do.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Gob »

Agreed.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9136
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Sue U »

Except it turns out that the deputy's injury was not caused by the knife but by one of the bullets fired by the other officer, that Curtis Smith was known as a devoted father of two young boys and a positive force in his community, that he had been distraught since the killing of his own father in 2012, that he inexplicably quit his job with the gas company four months ago and that his apparent depression or a psychotic break may have caused him to seek "suicide by cop."

So yeah, deserved killing, obvs. :roll: :roll: :roll:
GAH!

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

So yeah, deserved killing, obvs.
My comments were written based on the OP article.
When new evidence is presented, opinions can change.

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9136
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Sue U »

Then perhaps you shouldn't be so ready to cheer a man's death before all the facts are actually in.

Maybe the shooting was ultimately justified, maybe it wasn't. My question is, why is gunfire the officially approved first response? Especially in the security line at a courthouse, where there are usually a lot of people milling about, it is at least bordering on recklessness. It's a miracle no one else was killed in this incident. Wouldn't a taser have been just as effective? Or a nightstick? Or a couple of deputies jumping the guy? Courthouses tend to attract mentally unstable people all the time. Is there no training or protocol to deal with the potential for trouble without using deadly force first?
GAH!

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Then perhaps you shouldn't be so ready to cheer a man's death before all the facts are actually in.
You are correct. I stand here a flawed human being and ask that this character flaw be removed.
Thanks

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9136
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Sue U »

You're not the only one; we are certainly all deeply flawed.
GAH!

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Lord Jim »

Courthouses tend to attract mentally unstable people all the time.
Man, you got that right...

They're full of lawyers....

Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9136
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Sue U »

You know, I put that there as bait, but I really expected Meade to be the first to bite.

8-)
GAH!

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Me? I would never do that. I don't make fun of lawyers. Jokes about lawyers, perhaps
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Lord Jim »

Sue U wrote:You know, I put that there as bait, but I really expected Meade to be the first to bite.

8-)
So you underestimated my capacity to go for the cheap and obvious joke?

I'm hurt... :cry:

8-)
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: First jump a fence, then jump a deputy

Post by Gob »

Sue U wrote:You're not the only one; we are certainly all deeply flawed.
I'm not.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply