Lady Hillary and the rest of the court are not without sin, of course, but they pale in comparison with the Lying King.
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/12/the-ki ... rc=nl_fact
.
Once in office, Reagan’s deception in the Iran-Contra scandal briefly threatened his presidency. First, Reagan flatly denied wrongdoing, publicly declaring, “We did not — repeat, did not — trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we.” Months later, when subsequent revelations rendered that assertion untenable, Reagan delivered an Oval Office address in which he tried to reconcile his public claims with the factual record. “A few months ago, I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages,” Reagan said. “My heart and my best intentions still tell me that’s true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not.”
Nor Charles Manson.And yet she's less utterly contemptible than Trump, (which is just about the lowest bar imaginable; it's almost like saying, "well, you're not as bad as Ted Bundy"...)
The uniqueness of Trump is that the democrats don't need to do anything at all to make him look bad. The fun (but also sad) part is watching the other republican candidates fighting with each other and trying to get noticed. It's pathetic. I wouldn't vote for any one of them.dgs49 wrote:The neurotic need of the Left to try to make this guy look bad is almost funny. It' s like they feel a need to point out what The Donald says immediately after he says it; as though his admirers need an interpreter.
Or she will kill you.kmccune wrote:Better get to liking Her,the republicans are paving the way for Her ascension IMO.