'Uman rights innit

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

'Uman rights innit

Post by Gob »

British troops are being hindered in their fight against terrorists by the fear that enemy fighters could sue them for breaching human rights, according to the Defence Secretary.

Defence Secretary Michael Fallon warned that troops are being left unable to do their duty, and condemned the ‘ambulance chasing British law firms’ who bring the compensation claims.

The Ministry of Defence has faced more than 2,000 legal claims from enemy fighters who were captured or injured in action overseas, or the relatives of those killed.

Ministers are preparing plans to pull Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) following claims that it places soldiers at risk of court action.

Mr Fallon said there was ‘a strong case’ for terminating the European human rights law when sending forces into action overseas.

‘We don’t need these ambulance-chasing British law firms,’ he told The Sunday Telegraph.

‘It is not only extremely expensive but it inhibits the operational effectiveness of our troops because they start to worry about whether they will end up in a court or not.’

After months of build-up, this is the clearest sign so far that ministers would be prepared to abandon the convention in action.

The government would replace the European convention with a British Bill of Rights, which Mr Fallon said he hoped could be in place as soon as possible.

‘I would like to see [the Bill of Rights] soon because some of these court rulings are beginning to affect the effectiveness of British troops,’ he said.

But Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron dismissed the Defence Secretary’s comments as the ‘worst kind of jingoist rubbish’.

‘Our soldiers are currently fighting extremism to protect values like freedom, democracy and civil liberties – the very human rights that others seek to extinguish,’ he said.

Thousands of cases have been brought against the Ministry of Defence over the conduct of British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan – by fighters including Taliban and bomb-makers – leaving the British taxpayer facing a £150million bill.

Senior army officers argue the convention, brought into effect in 1953, is misused in combat situations as many of its principles relate to abuses during peacetime.

Countries can suspend some obligations at times of war or national emergency ‘threatening the life of the nation’.

Britain did so briefly after 9/11 to detain foreign terror suspects and countries including France, Portugal, Spain and the Czech Republic have done so to protect troops from legal action.

Since 2003, the Ministry of Defence has spent £100million on Iraq-related investigations and compensation, with £44million more earmarked for ongoing claims from Iraqis up to 2019.

The most expensive was the £31million Al-Sweady public inquiry, lasting five years, which exonerated British troops of claiming that they went on a torture and killing spree after a 2004 battle in southern Iraq.

The inquiry concluded some Iraqis had been mistreated but allegations of murder were based on ‘deliberate lies’.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z3vZZxcbQI
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

liberty
Posts: 4950
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by liberty »

As Jane Fonda once said, anyone who supports the war is as guilty of a war crime as the pilot who drops the bombs. So why not publish the names of all the troops so they all they all can be sued.

You can’t blame the lawyers for taking advantage of a free pot of gold. ( need I say)
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Bicycle Bill »

liberty wrote:As Jane Fonda once said, anyone who supports the war is as guilty of a war crime as the pilot who drops the bombs.
After doing a Google search (using that line as the search term) I cannot find that quote credited to Ms. Fonda anywhere.  However, I did find this one:
I remember saying goodbye to my father the night he left to join the Navy.  He didn't have to.  He was older than other servicemen and had a family to support but he wanted to be a part of the fight against fascism, not just make movies about it.  I admired this about him.
So I guess you're not a war criminal as long as you're against the same things she is.
I also found this one:
If you're ever in a situation where you're not getting served or you can't get what you need, just cry.
Sort of shows how a celebrity thinks, doesn't it?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

liberty
Posts: 4950
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by liberty »

Bicycle Bill wrote:
liberty wrote:As Jane Fonda once said, anyone who supports the war is as guilty of a war crime as the pilot who drops the bombs.
After doing a Google search (using that line as the search term) I cannot find that quote credited to Ms. Fonda anywhere.  However, I did find this one:
I remember saying goodbye to my father the night he left to join the Navy.  He didn't have to.  He was older than other servicemen and had a family to support but he wanted to be a part of the fight against fascism, not just make movies about it.  I admired this about him.
So I guess you're not a war criminal as long as you're against the same things she is.
I also found this one:
If you're ever in a situation where you're not getting served or you can't get what you need, just cry.
Sort of shows how a celebrity thinks, doesn't it?
Image
-"BB"-
She said a lot and gave a lot interviews that can’t be found on the internet. I have looked for them.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15388
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Joe Guy »

liberty wrote:She said a lot and gave a lot interviews that can’t be found on the internet. I have looked for them.
Jane Fonda once said, "A lot of people claim that I said things that I didn't."

It's not on the internet but I'm sure she said it.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

And here I thought we were "sue happy". :shrug :mrgreen:

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

I LIKE JANE FONDA'S...

Post by RayThom »

... "I Had A Dream" speech the most. And you can, in fact, find that on the internet. Unfortunately, it's misattributed to some guy named Martin Luther King.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Image

"I wrote that speech for Marty while waiting for Jane to get on with it"
- B. Williams
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Gob »

Can you imagine how the fight against Nazi Germany would have gone, with lawyers stalking the Brits?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Lord Jim »

They could avoid this problem if they just painted their weapons a bright safety yellow...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

That old "povidone-iodine cures everything" myth, eh?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Fafhrd
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:48 pm

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Fafhrd »

Joe Guy wrote:
liberty wrote:She said a lot and gave a lot interviews that can’t be found on the internet. I have looked for them.
Jane Fonda once said, "A lot of people claim that I said things that I didn't."

It's not on the internet but I'm sure she said it.
One thing I know Jane said was that the US received no foreign help during the American revolution (On the Dick Cavett show; I happened to be watching that night). I guess that Lafayette, Kosciusko, Pulaski, Von Steuben, Villeneuve (and his fleet of warships), and Rochambeau (and his army of 7,000 French soldiers) didn't count.

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

MORE "WHAT JANE DIDN'T SAY"

Post by RayThom »

Fafhrd wrote:
... One thing I know Jane said was that the US received no foreign help during the American revolution (On the Dick Cavett show; I happened to be watching that night). I guess that Lafayette, Kosciusko, Pulaski, Von Steuben, Villeneuve (and his fleet of warships), and Rochambeau (and his army of 7,000 French soldiers) didn't count.
Faf, nothing even close to what you claim can be verified upon a search of the web. A quote that controversial would surely have her name all over it, if true. Once again, Fonda has been untagged for yet another unquote. If you have a link please post it.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Re: MORE "WHAT JANE DIDN'T SAY"

Post by RayThom »

RayThom wrote:
Fafhrd wrote:
... One thing I know Jane said was that the US received no foreign help during the American revolution (On the Dick Cavett show; I happened to be watching that night). I guess that Lafayette, Kosciusko, Pulaski, Von Steuben, Villeneuve (and his fleet of warships), and Rochambeau (and his army of 7,000 French soldiers) didn't count.
Faf, nothing even close to what you claim can be verified upon a search of the web. A quote that controversial would surely have her name all over it, if true. Once again, Fonda has been untagged to yet another unquote. If you have a link please post it.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Fafhrd
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:48 pm

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Fafhrd »

Jane had an anti-war friend with her on the Cavett show; both Cavett and her friend set her straight. I was watching, and have always remembered the incident. I doubt that a Cavett show archive exists. I believe the show (No. 122) aired on January 7, 1970 (Fonda and Mark Lane were guests on that show).
Last edited by Fafhrd on Wed Dec 30, 2015 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Lord Jim »

Faf, there are two rules:

1. If it's on the internet it must be true

And the corollary:

2.If it's not on the internet, it never happened.

8-)
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by wesw »

there are many things that seem to be made difficult to find on the internet.

google is not non partisan

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11660
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by Crackpot »

Yeah they removed all that "grain found in the pyramids" stuff just to make Ben Carson look stupid.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

dgs49
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: 'Uman rights innit

Post by dgs49 »

Are the Brits too stupid to indemnify their troops against personal suits for actions taken in the context of their official duties?

Jesus.

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

AN INTERVIEW SO DAMNING...

Post by RayThom »

... especially made by someone so damningly idiotic, would NEVER have been missed being memorialized on the internet. The League of Geriatric Jane Fonda Haters couldn't help but make it known to any LGJFH members who needed to sling some muck at Hanoi Jane.

Youtube.com has posted every Cavett show featuring this deluded Hollywood starlet and, although she's always all puffed up on her celebrity level intellect, nowhere is anything mentioned about "the US received no foreign help during the American revolution."

Yes, it could have been said but, no, I seriously doubt it.

I do, however, remember when Illinois' future US Senator, Barack Obama, was on the old Merv Griffin show and he talked quite frankly about his early years about being born and growing up in Kogelo, Kenya. I'll post a link as soon as I find it.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

Post Reply