hillary

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

hillary

Post by wesw »

I am an ardent supporter of the Fairness Doctrine.

I remember when it ended.

honest debate has withered since its demise.

so in the interest of fairness, seeing as how The Donald is the only thing going around here, and in the nation, I will provide this thread, and the opportunity for exposure that it provides, to my noble adversaries in this great experiment that we call america, so that they may sing the praises of their formerly anointed leader

(darn, I love me a good sentence.)

(is it racist that when, instead of using good English, I write in my friendly voice, like I did when quoting black guys that I knew from my youth and that I know in my adulthood? )

(yes, I realize that meade does not call us america, but he is only worthy of a parenthetical mention, so who cares?)

let me be the first to provide Hillary , in her own words, to you, her fans. (since her supporters don t seem to have anything good, or anything at all to say about her.)

its weird, my 'puter auto corrects Hillary to capital, but not america....

actually that s not weird , that's Gates and Zuckerberg....

without further doo doo, here s Hillary. (sorry about the tone guys, but I m really hoping that meade puts me back on ignore) (ok, so there was a little more doo doo...) (here s some more)

(and I m really bothered that guin doesn t like me anymore. you are just my noble adversary, not my enemy and I m sorry if I went over the line. this Hillary thing is just beanbag, guin, and I view trump as necessary and not evil at all. what is good will seem evil, and what is evil will seem good. I read that somewhere.... I m sorry. and I ve already apologized to sue. if she missed it, I am sorry, sue. but you have been a little harsh towards me from the beginning here, and I took it badly, still I am sorry)


wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

man, never post when you are stoned..., well, not this stoned...

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

darn, I put an apostrophe in there that I didn t realize that I d put in. my typing is really improving, but I don t want to waste time on obvious apostrophes....

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: hillary

Post by Bicycle Bill »

wesw wrote:man, never post when you are stoned..., well, not this stoned...
How can the rest of us tell the difference?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

well, when your eyes are like heavy and your kinda smilin', and there s like a pleasant buzz in your head..., and it really doesn t bother you that your fuckin' neck is fuckin' killing you..., your stoned.

plus you get all sappy....

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: hillary

Post by Bicycle Bill »

I meant how can *WE* tell when you are posting while stoned as opposed to just posting in your normal frame of mind?
Or is stoned to some given level your normal frame of mind?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

oooooh...

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

do you still ride a bicycle? what kind?

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: hillary

Post by Bicycle Bill »

wesw wrote:do you still ride a bicycle? what kind?
I have over a dozen, including tandems, recumbents, mountain bikes, touring bikes, commuter bikes, road bikes, and folding bikes.
I believe in having the proper tool for the task.  After all, you don't use a hammer when the job calls for a screwdriver.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: hillary

Post by wesw »

if you had to ride seven miles from your house, which bike would you ride?

in other words, what kind of bike do you like to ride?

I only ride to the store now, but I have a nice bike that I got some good use out of, and older Gary Fisher Marlin, nothing fancy, but nice.

when I was younger I built a couple really fast ten and 12 speeds from good parts bikes . I kinda customized them to fit me.

I used to ride fast....

i rode to work for years when I was a young man, like 5-7 miles. I even used to take my son to daycare on my bike for a while...., dodging Dobermans... :)

User avatar
datsunaholic
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:53 am
Location: The Wet Coast

Re: hillary

Post by datsunaholic »

Bicycle Bill wrote:  After all, you don't use a hammer when the job calls for a screwdriver.
Sadly, I know a drywall installer that disagrees with you.

Yes, he uses drywall screws. Pounds them in with a hammer. "It's faster". Well, it is a drywall hammer. Image
Death is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9795
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: hillary

Post by Bicycle Bill »

wesw wrote:if you had to ride seven miles from your house, which bike would you ride?

in other words, what kind of bike do you like to ride?

I only ride to the store now, but I have a nice bike that I got some good use out of, and older Gary Fisher Marlin, nothing fancy, but nice.

when I was younger I built a couple really fast ten and 12 speeds from good parts bikes . I kinda customized them to fit me.

I used to ride fast....

i rode to work for years when I was a young man, like 5-7 miles. I even used to take my son to daycare on my bike for a while...., dodging Dobermans... :)
I suppose it would either be the commuter bike — which is an old off-brand 1980s fully-fendered 10-speed with 27x1¼ tires and a set of old 'bull-moose' bars cut down for clearance; the "stealth mountain bike" — which is an old Schwinn Woodlands MTB that has an all-black Cro-Mo frame and when I put it together I tried to use as many black components (derailleurs, brakes, crank arms, chain rings, rims, etc.) as possible; or my old 1976 Trek touring bike which I built from the frameset up (at that time Trek wasn't yet building complete bikes).  I might also grab the Vision R-40 just because it is still sure to draw attention as there aren't all that many recumbent riders around here on a daily basis.

It depends on which one has the tires pumped up to pressure and is closest to the garage door.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: hillary

Post by Lord Jim »

Bicycle Bill wrote:
wesw wrote:man, never post when you are stoned..., well, not this stoned...
How can the rest of us tell the difference?
Image
-"BB"-
LOL :lol:

That's an excellent point Bill...

Especially when he posts stuff like this about Trump:
he will win 50 states and 50% of the black vote in the general election.....
He must have been really baked when he came up with that lulu.... :D

Anyway, since this thread is supposedly about Hilary, it looks like as good a place as any to post an observation about the Demo debates:

There's another one scheduled for tomorrow night...

Unlike the GOP debates, that were scheduled with an attempt to get the largest possible audiences, the Dems hold their debates on Saturday nights, or like tomorrow, up against major events, (like NFL playoff games) in a deliberate effort to try and avoid getting large audiences...

The reason for this is because DNC Chairwoman Debbie Pinocchio-Schultz is completely in the tank for Hilary, and the thinking was that avoiding giving any of her possible opponents a large TV audience was the best way to advance her lock on the nomination... (This is also why the Dems are only having six debates...Pinocchio-Schultz probably would have preferred to have none if she thought she could have gotten away with it....)

However, as things have developed, this strategy may not have been all that helpful to Slick Hillie, because at the moment the momentum is all with Sanders, and she's the one who could really use a great debate performance with a large audience to help her stay on top....

Speaking of in the tank for Hilary, I see that one of the debate "moderators" tomorrow will be Andrea Mitchell...

I guess Chelsea Clinton wasn't available...

Better duck and put on your safety-helmets guys, the hardballs are really gonna be flyin'! :ok

:lol:
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11660
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: hillary

Post by Crackpot »

Lord Jim wrote:Unlike the GOP debates, that were scheduled with an attempt to get the largest possible audiences, the Dems hold their debates on Saturday nights, or like tomorrow, up against major events, (like NFL playoff games) in a deliberate effort to try and avoid getting large audiences...
i"m sure in hindsight the parties will have wished they has swapped strategies.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply