"First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

"First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Gob »

A white Chicago police officer who fatally shot a black teenager last December is suing his family for $10m (£6.9m), claiming emotional distress.


Robert Rialmo shot 19-year-old student Quintonio LeGrier six times, killing the boy's neighbour in the process.

Mr Rialmo says Mr LeGrier swung at him with a baseball bat from close range, but Mr LeGrier's lawyers say the two were at least 20ft (6m) apart.

The lawsuit comes amid a federal investigation into Chicago's police.

The investigation is focusing on the use of force by officers and the department's accountability procedures.

It was launched after weeks of protests over the police killing of a black teenager by a white officer.

Laquan McDonald, 17, was shot 16 times in 2014 by the officer, who was charged with murder over a year later.

The inquiry will take a similar form to those recently conducted in Baltimore and Ferguson, Missouri - as well as more than 20 other departments in recent years, and will look for systematic violations of US civil rights laws.

Joel Brodsky, Mr Rialmo's defence lawyer, said it was important in an atmosphere charged by police shootings to send a message that police are "not targets for assaults" and "suffer damage like anybody else".

Mr LeGrier's father, Antonio, filed a wrongful death lawsuit days after the shooting, saying his son was not armed with a weapon and was not a threat.

His lawyer, Basileios Foutris, said Mr Rialmo's lawsuit was "a new low even for the Chicago Police Department".

"First you shoot them, then you sue them," he said.

The lawsuit provides the officer's first public account of how he says the shooting happened.

Mr Rialmo, who was responding to a domestic disturbance call, says Mr LeGrier came charging at him down the stairs and swung a baseball bat at his head. Mr Rialmo says he backed away and shouted at Mr LeGrier to drop the bat, but drew his weapon and fired after the teenager swung the bat again.

Mr Rialmo fired six times, killing both Mr LeGrier and Bettie Jones, a neighbour who was standing behind the teenager.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by dales »

Lettuce Know Attempt To Balance The Equation........Good Cops

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/good-cops/

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Jarlaxle »

Yeah...there might be a dozen or so good cops left.

But I wouldn't bet more than ten bucks on that.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by dales »

Jarl, why do you hate cops so much?

I've been arrested twice, each time the arresting officers were kind and considerate.

It's all about ATTITUDE when one deals with law enforcement personnel.

Perhaps you acted like a dick and got slapped down for it?

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Jarlaxle »

I see the rotten-to-the-core corruption. That, and the one time I actually did need them, they engaged in a criminal conspiracy with my attacker.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9825
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Jarlaxle wrote:I see the rotten-to-the-core corruption. That, and the one time I actually did need them, they engaged in a criminal conspiracy with my attacker.
Jarlaxle, I'm gonna call bullshit.  I don't even know you but I'm gonna call bullshit.

Usually, when I find someone who is all "Eff the cops" it's usually because at some point in time they were doing something that went against the rules or laws of society and the cops stopped them from doing it.  Sorry, but protestations like "there I was, minding my own business smoking my bong" or "I was just holding up the convenience store; it wasn't like I had shot anybody, you know?" or "I only had a couple of shots but they've gotta make their quota" after blowing a 0.14 on the breathalyzer, for example, just doesn't cut it with me.  Same goes for playing the race card, claiming the cops "don't understand where we're coming from", or spouting some line like "the cops are always out to hassle the gays/punks/homeless/anyone who looks like a Muslim..." — or the classic "Whaddya mean I can't do that?  I GOT MY RIGHTS!!!"

I'm willing to bet that I've met a damned sight more "good" cops in my 61-year life than you've met bad ones.  Of course, when I do have to have an encounter with a law enforcement officer I don't come into it with the attitude of "Phuque you, pig, what do *YOU* want anyway?" either.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Jarlaxle »

I called 911 on my psychotic father. His good friend was a police lieutenant and he knew both cops, who, after laughing and joking wth him for a while, told him to "not leave too many bruises."

Fuck off.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by dales »

Sorry to hear that.

You might have explored other legal options?

I'm assuming they have mental health facilities where you live?

If not....

Perhaps you should re-locate to a more prosperous area where such services exist.

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

kmccune
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 10:07 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Alleghanies

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by kmccune »

Never had that much trouble with the Officers ,the ones I really dislike are the neighbor hood investigators who are trying to make a name and trying to stick you with charges that you probably would have decked anyone else if they said it ,I think BB used to be in law enforcement .But on the other hand some of my best friends are cops ,so I have no problem with laws as long as they are not so eagerly and over zealously pursued .I have a problem with any cop that boasts they would write their own grandmother.:nana

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

i guess there are some people who just have troubles in life, some of them involving police presence in a non-helpful way. I don't know anyone who has that kind of trouble with police, other than local ne'er-do-wells
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Jarlaxle »

dales wrote:Sorry to hear that.

You might have explored other legal options?

I'm assuming they have mental health facilities where you live?

If not....

Perhaps you should re-locate to a more prosperous area where such services exist.
Sober up.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by dales »

Jarlaxle wrote:
dales wrote:Sorry to hear that.

You might have explored other legal options?

I'm assuming they have mental health facilities where you live?

If not....

Perhaps you should re-locate to a more prosperous area where such services exist.
Sober up.
Lighten up.

Sorry you live in such a crappy area that doesn't offer mental health services.

Oh well, if you want to spend the rest of your miserable life with a stick jammed up your keester, who cares? :nana

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Econoline »

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Cleveland wants the estate of Tamir Rice to pay for the boy's ambulance ride and medical services he received after he was shot by a city police officer.

Assistant law director Carl Meyers filed a claim in Cuyahoga County Probate Court Wednesday notifying Tamir's estate that it owes the city $500 for "ambulance advance life support" and mileage expense for the ambulance ride to MetroHealth Medical Center.

"The callousness, insensitivity, and poor judgment required for the city to send a bill—its own police officers having slain 12-year-old Tamir—is breathtaking," the family's attorney, Subodh Chandra, said in an emailed statement. "This adds insult to homicide."

Chandra represents members of Tamir's family in a civil lawsuit filed against the city.

Spokesmen for the city did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tamir was shot by a Cleveland police officer Nov. 22, 2014, after he was seen playing with a replica airsoft gun in a West Side park.

Tamir's family sued the city, in part arguing that officers Timothy Loehmann and Frank Garmback showed indifference to Tamir's life by not giving him any emergency aid after Loehmann shot him.

The officers stood around Tamir for four minutes, until an FBI agent arrived at the scene and gave the boy first aid.

The 911 caller also said Tamir looked like a juvenile and that the gun might have been fake, but that information was never relayed to officers Timothy Lohemann and Frank Garmback.

source

:arg
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by Lord Jim »

I heard about that this morning on the news, and was planning to post about it...

Absolutely unbelievable... :roll: :loon
ImageImageImage

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by dales »

Cleveland - The Mistake By The Lake

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: "First you shoot them, then you sue them,"

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Lord Jim wrote:I heard about that this morning on the news, and was planning to post about it...

Absolutely unbelievable... :roll: :loon
Gob-smacking, ain't it?

No, not our Gob.
(Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, slang) The mouth.
He′s always stuffing his gob with fast food.
Oi, you, shut your gob!
She's got such a gob on her – she′s always gossiping about someone or other.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply