A black MP has said she was the victim of racism in Westminster when she was mistaken as a cleaner by an MP.
Dawn Butler told BBC 5 Radio Live she was in a members-only lift when an unnamed Commons member told her: "This lift really isn't for cleaners."
The Labour MP for Brent Central said it had been one of "so many incidents" of racism she had encountered while in Parliament.
The 46-year-old became an MP in 2005 and was re-elected last year.
Former London mayor Ken Livingstone said that for Ms Butler to be confronted in such a manner was "ridiculous" as "she was elected years ago" and "gets up and speaks" in the chamber.
Ms Butler, the daughter of Jamaican immigrants, has previously described other instances of racism in the Commons.
Writing for the Fawcett Society in 2008, she said she was once confronted by a former minister who queried whether she was allowed in the members area on the terrace.
She wrote that when she told him she was an MP, he replied: "They're letting anybody in nowadays."
Colander
Colander
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Colander
No takers on the "colander" title?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Colander
No
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Colander
Pastafarians is it?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
-
Burning Petard
- Posts: 4596
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
- Location: Near Bear, Delaware
Re: Colander
I love the scepter
Re: Colander
I was inferring her story; "has more holes in it than a colander..."
Anybody spot them?
Anybody spot them?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Colander
No, you're implying.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Colander
I think you are implying, not inferring, and you are going to have to explain your holes.
- Sue U
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Colander
That's not really the kind of question you'd want to ask Gob, @w. Particularly because he's likely to give you an answer.TPFKA@W wrote:I think you are implying, not inferring, and you are going to have to explain your holes.
GAH!
Re: Colander
I hard read her story, and inferred that she was telling porkies.to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence:
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Colander
Spoilsport.Sue U wrote:That's not really the kind of question you'd want to ask Gob, @w. Particularly because he's likely to give you an answer.TPFKA@W wrote:I think you are implying, not inferring, and you are going to have to explain your holes.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- Sue U
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: Colander
She may be; she didn't identify any of the alleged offenders. On the other hand, if she had identified them, do you think they'd admit it?Gob wrote:I hard read her story, and inferred that she was telling porkies.
On the whole, however, it's not even a "news" story. Is there some reason this should be brought to the world's attention?
ETA:
Oh, like I could even stop you anyway?Gob wrote:Spoilsport.
Last edited by Sue U on Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GAH!
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21467
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Colander
Reading's almost as tough as writing, eh?Gob wrote:I hard read her story, and inferred that she was telling porkies.to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence:
You made an inference (all to your sweet self) when you read the article. Then you posed the article with Subject (colander) implying that you thought there were holes in her story. That is the implication of your title and you expected us to infer the same as you had inferred.
Now, as to the holes....
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Colander
Ah well, fer all yer book learnin you aint that smart...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Colander
I'll start the ball rolling then....
If you are a more-lefty-than-Karl-Marx black Labour MP and you are subjected to a "racist slur", by being called a "cleaner", do you:
a) Sit and brood on it for 5+ years, then feel the need to get it off your chest on a radio interview?
b) Run screaming "racism, racism, oh my god please help me, racism, racism, racism, I was called a "cleaner" by a fellow MP!!!!!" to the nearest Guardian reporter?
If you are a more-lefty-than-Karl-Marx black Labour MP and you are subjected to a "racist slur", by being called a "cleaner", do you:
a) Sit and brood on it for 5+ years, then feel the need to get it off your chest on a radio interview?
b) Run screaming "racism, racism, oh my god please help me, racism, racism, racism, I was called a "cleaner" by a fellow MP!!!!!" to the nearest Guardian reporter?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Colander
If it's just one more in a series of racist insults you've had to deal with all of your life, then yeah, you might just tend to swallow it along with all the rest. What on earth could possibly make you think that you have any insight into how victims of racism deal with it?
Are you also one of those people who look with suspicion on rape victims who don't run to a police station 30 seconds after being attacked?
Are you also one of those people who look with suspicion on rape victims who don't run to a police station 30 seconds after being attacked?
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell


