dgs49 wrote:The basically-defining sexual practice of male homosexuals ("...No son, those boys in the picture are NOT playing leap-frog...") is not only a biological absurdity and destructive of body parts that were decidedly NOT designed for this sort of invasive activity...
Sorry to burst your bubble, however...
The most intensive sexual pleasure and response in men is achieved through direct stimulation of the prostate, resulting in explosive and prolonged orgasms without any stimulation of the penis. The only way to effect such stimulation is through the anal wall (i.e. through anal intercourse or some other form of anal penetration). The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the male body was designed for such stimulation to occur, i.e. that it was designed for anal intercourse.
One would be hard pressed to understand how someone who believed that a deity had a hand in the design of human anatomy could deny this obvious fact.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose
As I've said for years, if god finds bum sex so distasteful, why did he make it possible?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Nope, that would be a fallacy/over generalization to say only religion was thus so. That construct is used by fanatics of political, racial, national and/or religious beliefs, et al.
Also it is a fallacy to say all religion is fanatical in nature.
Nope, that would be a fallacy/over generalization to say only religion was thus so. That construct is used by fanatics of political, racial, national and/or religious beliefs, et al.
Also it is a fallacy to say all religion is fanatical in nature.
(My bold)
Neither the word 'only' or the word 'all' appeared in Strop's post. You're putting words in his mouth.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
loCAtek wrote:His statement sound like a vague over generalization, I attempted to clarify it, but you claimed it was accurate.
Well I propose we not read anything into it that wasn't actually written. It seemed pretty clear to me. I can see no reason for you to take it upon yourself to change it's meaning. If you disagree with it that's fine but it might be better to construct your own disagreement rather than re-construct somebody else's opinion. If you thought it needed clarification wouldn't the proper thing have been to ask Strop himself to clarify it?
Therefore, I ask you do you address all religion or just fanatical religion?
I'm not actually addressing anything. It wasn't my post you 'clarified'.
Also as an atheist, how is it you presume to speak for theists?
Where did I ever claim to be an atheist? I presume to speak for nobody, be they theist or non-theist, but myself.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Scooter: "The most intensive sexual pleasure and response in men is achieved through direct stimulation of the prostate, resulting in explosive and prolonged orgasms without any stimulation of the penis."
Source, please.
Anecdotally, I would say that I do not relish my annual appointment with my urologist, although he directly stimulates my prostate.
dgs49 wrote:Scooter: "The most intensive sexual pleasure and response in men is achieved through direct stimulation of the prostate, resulting in explosive and prolonged orgasms without any stimulation of the penis."
Source, please.
200 million uphill gardeners can't be wrong!
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Can you explain to me exactly what business it is of yours?
Or even how it is relevant to this discussion... apart from colouring your view of my every post of course...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
You should probably just abandon all hope, Sean. Once loCAtek gets into making accusations that she cannot substantiate and spewing about fallacies whose names she has glommed onto from sources that she hasn't bothered to read, fallacies whose substance she has no grasp of, it's pretty much over.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
