Relatable Guy Spends $1.5 Million Bank Error On Hookers, Coke And Fast Cars
Tom McParland
Today 2:55pm
· Filed to: Aussie Bros
What would you do if the bank just let you keep taking money out? A 22-year old Australian man took advantage of a bank error that allowed him to withdraw funds up to $1.5 million and spent it how you would expect: on hookers, drugs and cars.
According to the Mirror, Luke Moore stumbled upon a bank glitch that gave him practically unlimited access to all the cash he wanted. He was 22 at the time, and several thousand dollars in debt. So naturally, he took full advantage of the cash infusion and lived out his bachelor fantasies by spending the money on prostitutes and cocaine. Of course, a young baller needs some hot rides to match his lifestyle, so he purchased a Maserati, an Aston Martin and a boat.
He lived the high life for two years before authorities caught up with him and charged him with fraud. After a stint in jail, he successfully appealed his conviction by arguing his actions were “not deceptive.”
Now Moore lives back at home with his mom, drives a cheap car and lives off of Ramen noodles. According to the Mirror, Moore says he’s happier now than he was when he was living off of all that extra cash.
He said: “I pull more chicks now with $20 in my pocket than I did when I was splashing the bank’s cash.
“With age comes wisdom and confidence and I’ve learned money doesn’t buy everything — but it was great while it lasted.”
Having successfully used the precedent of Finders Keepers v. Losers Weepers, Moore is back at school, currently studying criminal law.
From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
"Finders-Keepers", huh? A smart burglar could probably use that line of defense too.
-"BB"-
"No, your honor, I did not steal anything. I merely found it before the other guy realized that he had lost it."

-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
-
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Reminds me of George Best (RIP) who was the best footballer (soccer player) of his generation. When asked by a reporter where all the money went, he said: "Two thirds of it went on women, booze and fast cars. The rest I just squandered."
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
That suggests to me that he's switched from coke to hallucinogens...Now Moore lives back at home with his mom, drives a cheap car and lives off of Ramen noodles. According to the Mirror, Moore says he’s happier now than he was when he was living off of all that extra cash.
He said: “I pull more chicks now with $20 in my pocket than I did when I was splashing the bank’s cash.



Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Aw, c'mon, he's just achieved enlightenment. 

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
They may not have meant to, but they did give him the money.
"The quality of mercy is not strained It droppeth as pennies from heaven."
yrs,
rubato
"The quality of mercy is not strained It droppeth as pennies from heaven."
yrs,
rubato
- Sue U
- Posts: 8991
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Having successfully used the precedent ... s Weepers,
Alternatively, he might have successfully litigated the matter using this commonly-applied doctrine:

Alternatively, he might have successfully litigated the matter using this commonly-applied doctrine:
GAH!
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Am I the only one who finds a grown man telling a little kid on a playground to "touch my pen" a little creepy? 




- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Am I the only one who's never heard of "Touch black, no back"?Lord Jim wrote:Am I the only one who finds a grown man telling a little kid on a playground to "touch my pen" a little creepy?

-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Nope. But I led a somewhat sheltered childhood.Bicycle Bill wrote:Am I the only one who's never heard of "Touch black, no back"?Lord Jim wrote:Am I the only one who finds a grown man telling a little kid on a playground to "touch my pen" a little creepy?
-"BB"-

- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21238
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
I guess there really is a sandal clause
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Me neither. The way I heard it was, "Once you go black, you never go back"...Bicycle Bill wrote: Am I the only one who's never heard of "Touch black, no back"?

Re: From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
I'm not sure where the expression came from (I'd bet it's something racist), but we used it when I grew up in Brooklyn to seal trading deals (like baseball cards) and stop fights about who owned something (of course the black was usually the asphalt in the street; probably wouldn't work as well in the country). Other things I recall--yelling chipsies at the start of a stickball game meant the owner of the ball suffered the risk of loss--"no chipsies" meant the person who was responsible for its loss (in a sewer, on a roof, or in a yard with mean dog) would have to pay for it. These kids' etiquette rules stopped a lot of fights before they began.
Actually, a number of years back I read an article in the NY Times about the etiquette of who gets to ride in the font passenger seat, involving calling "shottie" with a number of tie breakers including blitzing and wrestling among those who called shottie at the same time.
Actually, a number of years back I read an article in the NY Times about the etiquette of who gets to ride in the font passenger seat, involving calling "shottie" with a number of tie breakers including blitzing and wrestling among those who called shottie at the same time.
From Sandals To Shoes To Sandals In Australia
Yeah, probably some kind of derivation like "Eenie meenie miney mo. Touch black, no back."Big RR wrote:I'm not sure where the expression came from (I'd bet it's something racist)...

“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”