Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Jarlaxle wrote:Dude...there are people that might even have made you seem like a lightweight.
I know a few. :mrgreen:
Top
Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by Jarlaxle »

One store I deliver to has a regular...dude drinks a 30-pack of Genessee cream ale every DAY.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.
Top
User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by dales »

Image

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato
Top
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:
Contact MajGenl.Meade

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Is there any sentiment to ban dales' graph generator?
:lol:
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Top
User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by Bicycle Bill »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:Is there any sentiment to ban dales' graph generator?
:lol:
No, but he should be made to indicate just what it is that he is graphing.
Take the one above ... I think this is a breakdown by percentage of just what sort of women's health services are provided by Planned Parenthood, but how would one know for sure?
And there is also no reference for what time period this is supposed to be representing.  Is this current or historical data?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Top
User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Another Graph

Post by RayThom »

What? It's quite obvious to see exactly what dales is graphically explaining.

Let's break it down:
Image
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 
Top
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21467
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:
Contact MajGenl.Meade

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:Is there any sentiment to ban dales' graph generator?
:lol:
Uh, see Bill, that there was a very extended musical pun. If you have to explain 'em......
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Top
User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by Bicycle Bill »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:
MajGenl.Meade wrote:Is there any sentiment to ban dales' graph generator?
:lol:
Uh, see Bill, that there was a very extended musical pun. If you have to explain 'em......
When you have to stretch as far as you did to make a pun that refers to such an obscure band, you almost HAVE to explain them.

The best puns require no explanation.  For example, do you know why the Dionne family was able to travel so inexpensively?
.
.
.
Because of Air Canada's free quint flyer program.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Top
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by Gob »

My fave Prog band. Peter Hammill is a philosopher / poet!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Top
oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Don't you mean a Van de Graaff generator?
Image

:o
Top
User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by dales »

Image

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato
Top
rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by rubato »

dales wrote:Image
Noting that the Repuglican states +Oregon are the real porkmonsters. And I hafta tell you people in Oregon are amazingly obese. There are fleets of electric carts at Fred Meyer so the 350lb + crowd can buy even more calories without expending any.

Squeeeel Squeeel


Dizzgusting. Cheap calories = obesity.


yrs,
rubato
Top
User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Another Graph (oh no, not again!)

Post by dales »

A calorie is only a unit of heat.

And I need to lose some heat. 8-)

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Politics”