Pussyhat.com

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20057
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Pussyhat.com

Post by BoSoxGal »

If you had any doubt of the massive insecurity complex that is our new commander in chief, look who bought this domain name:

http://pussyhat.com/
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15395
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Pussyhat.com

Post by Joe Guy »

I would have expected his website to be pussygrab.com.

Maybe he misspelled it...

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Pussyhat.com

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Based on a quick internet search of domain information, it appears to be registered through a domain broken in Queensland, Australia ... who in turn has probably leased it, Go-Daddy.com style, to whitehouse.gov who have set things so that it redirects to that site.

I've seen this done other times as well.  One of the webcomics I enjoy ("Dumbing of Age, by David Willis) featured a story arc a few years ago (my, how time flies!) about the protagonist's brother (Joshua, a budding writer) and at one point in the comic he gave someone his website — JocelyneJBrown.com (yes, the character is someone who is male-to-female transgender but still has not opened up to his/her family about it); the artist registered that specific site address and has it set up to redirect to the comic's home page.

Makes me wish I had some extra money on hand.  Imagine the fun I could have if I created a site like "wesw.com" and set it to re-direct to the DNC or Hillary Clinton website.

Back to the matter at hand, however.  It might be interesting to see how the Trumpmeister would respond to a blunt, direct question about whether or not this was a valid and worthwhile use of US government funds, however ... although I'm sure he and his sycophants would see it that way.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

Post Reply